Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A little something different \( ' - ` )/Follow

#1 Jan 23 2005 at 9:47 PM Rating: Good
**
446 posts
So much More I am Full of Myself

feedback comments and suggestions as well as general douchebaggery now being accepted thanks for your consideration
#2 Jan 23 2005 at 11:40 PM Rating: Good
*
124 posts
that's actually pretty cool, i assume more shots are coming...

can't wait to see more as you progress in your levels

definate rate up ^^;
#3 Jan 24 2005 at 12:25 AM Rating: Good
*
222 posts
You suck d00d!!! ^^ just kidding, how can I pick on somebody that has the same teh sexhay template as me... Awesome work thus far, keep it up!

<rate up>
#4 Jan 24 2005 at 2:22 AM Rating: Good
Might wanna use a photo format other than .bmp Smiley: banghead
#5 Jan 24 2005 at 2:24 AM Rating: Default
**
446 posts
already working on that.
.GIF is my friend.
.BMP is a temp format that I am using as a temp
before the glossy shine ^^
#6 Jan 24 2005 at 2:35 AM Rating: Good
Good stuff.

I like the idea of the pics showing up when you hover over the list rather than having to click, but I'd recommend parsing the site into frames, and anchoring the picture window in one of those rather than floating with the mouse pointer. Unless you're on an over-the-top system (and I am not) the motion tends to be more jarring, less fluid.
#7 Jan 24 2005 at 2:47 AM Rating: Default
**
446 posts
nataraja the Puissant wrote:
Good stuff.

I like the idea of the pics showing up when you hover over the list rather than having to click, but I'd recommend parsing the site into frames, and anchoring the picture window in one of those rather than floating with the mouse pointer. Unless you're on an over-the-top system (and I am not) the motion tends to be more jarring, less fluid.


Heh you guys are enjoying the site with kinks and bugs,
a little more elbow grease and it will have progressed to
something a bit more negotiable for many different types of systems.
#8 Jan 24 2005 at 7:50 AM Rating: Decent
**
512 posts
check your functionality with low res monitors; i had some issues viewing the photos at 800X600 in Mozilla Firefox. i know it's me that sucks, but web designers usually shoot for the LCD right? just some constructive criticism.

i really like the shots, and the functionality, and the design. good work.
#9 Jan 24 2005 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
**
919 posts
Taikobo- "man of Mystery"

I will be seeing you in courts, i was the first one to call him that ^.^

Fun Site. /rate up
#10 Jan 25 2005 at 2:27 AM Rating: Good
Squire zandertheredmage wrote:
Heh you guys are enjoying the site with kinks and bugs,
a little more elbow grease and it will have progressed to
something a bit more negotiable for many different types of systems.


Heh, I wasn't complaining. You were just asking for feedback, so I provided. ^^
#11 Jan 25 2005 at 6:04 AM Rating: Decent
**
446 posts
nataraja the Puissant wrote:
Squire zandertheredmage wrote:
Heh you guys are enjoying the site with kinks and bugs,
a little more elbow grease and it will have progressed to
something a bit more negotiable for many different types of systems.


Heh, I wasn't complaining. You were just asking for feedback, so I provided. ^^


you have me lost on that one.
#12 Jan 25 2005 at 1:42 PM Rating: Good
Squire zandertheredmage wrote:
nataraja the Puissant wrote:
Squire zandertheredmage wrote:
Heh you guys are enjoying the site with kinks and bugs,
a little more elbow grease and it will have progressed to
something a bit more negotiable for many different types of systems.


Heh, I wasn't complaining. You were just asking for feedback, so I provided. ^^


you have me lost on that one.


It seemed to me that you felt we were ******** at you.

I may have mistook your meaning.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 109 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (109)