Wintaru Defender of Justice wrote:
My PC tends to sound like a jet fighter taking off when I try to play this game on it so I'm stuck on the PS2 for the most part but isn't the DNAS authentication system PS2 users go through before logging in to POL basically the same thing as a file check?
Maybe they could implement something like that for this? This is just one example of how you can cheat by taking out game files, maybe there's other not publicized/thought of yet?
First, just for fun, information pooled from http://www.us.playstation.com/dnas
Quote:
“DNAS” (Dynamic Network Authentication System)
This Software uses “DNAS” (Dynamic Network Authentication System), a proprietary authentication system created by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (“SCEI”).
“DNAS” retrieves information about a user’s hardware and software for authentication, copy protection, account blocking, system, rules, or game management and other purposes.
The information collected does not identify the user personally. A publisher can combine this information with personally identifying information from the publisher’s records if the user provides the personally identifying information. Before providing any personal information to a publisher please be sure to review the publisher’s privacy policy and terms and conditions of use. Do not provide personally identifying information to a publisher unless you accept the conditions of use and terms of their privacy policy.
Basically DNAS is a robust system and software verification process that allows the host server to gleen pretty much any information about its users that it wants (minus private things such as your identity and the **** you've recently browsed).
I'm not particularly familiar with it, but I would imagine rather than searching through every game file it looks only at specific files specified by the host server's admin. I suppose you could theoretically set it to also look for every mob's model file, but that would make the log-in process much longer, probably enough to completely infuriate dial-up users such that they assemble a ragtag army and march on SE's corporate offices in Japan, bearing crude farm implements and torches, set on the murder, tar, feathering, and general desecration of all its employees.
The fix I would recommend would be to slightly alter the procedure called for targeting such that, as someone recommended above, the target point is seperate from the existance of the model in question.
Also it would be wise to flag the file for mandatory reinstalation at the next log-in. These files are (comparatively) small and catching them in-game and forcing them to be reapplied would alleviate any lasting benefit someone could conceivably gain from this exploit after the targeting issue is repaired.
Regarding the original topic allow me to point out the following:
Final Fantasy XI User Agreement, Article 3.1(g)
secure.playonline.com/supportus/rule_ff11user.html Final Fantasy XI Software License Agreement, Article 2.4 (a)
secure.playonline.com/supportus/rule_ff11soft.html A Word on Abusing Exploits, archived at Allakhazam.
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/news/sdetail4337.html?story=4337
Square-Enix wrote:
... please remember that exploiting flaws in the game is not something we can tolerate.
And with that, I'll add my own voice to the clamor, though I know much of this has already been treaded and retreaded for a while now.
[DISCLAIMER]Regardless of my opinions on these subjects as a purely intellectual matter I offer no opinion on the worth of those engaging in exploits as a whole disregarding this one activity, make no comment or association that the activities of members of any linkshell community are par for the course for the linkshell as a whole, and indeed am speaking exactly about what I say I'm speaking about without any need for broader insinuations to be spread to other areas of any persons character or anything broader than the subjects on which I'll focus.
In short, if I don't specifically come out and point a finger at you and make accusations, don't assume that I am just because I commented on some related (or unrelated) area or mentioned something that someone you know does but you yourself do not.
Failure to comply will result in me spitting on your shoe.
You have been warned.[/DISCLAIMER] That being said, I'll plow onward.
Having established that the foundational issue of exploitations of the game to cause it to operate in a manner other than its original intent for any benefit over players who do not employ the same methods of exploitation is a violation of several user agreements and additionally of questionable legality, depending on what legal jurisdiction in which you reside, I think the overall area of debate here is more related to how a community
should react to this.
Bearing in mind that one of the foundations of rule and law and any other term you could apply to this kind of concept (hereafter refered to as The Rules) is to protect the rights of groups and individuals by providing avenues through which Justice (term used loosely) can be served, I see no reason why an aggrieved individual should not bring the issue to a public forum to bring the issue to light for those who might, unwary, be likewise aggrieved by such activities.
The Rules in this case pertain to the exploitation of a flaw in the game which provides not for the rights of Square-Enix, who insofar as their own well-being apart from the grievances of their clients is concerned couldn't care less, but rather for the fairness of the persistant world in which their clients find entertainment. Therefore I would argue that the original post was well within rights, being the public illumination of this issue from one whose rights are potentially infringed.
Regarding privacy I can only reiterate as has been noted elsewhere that a livejournal is far from private. I see any arguement regarding a supposed violation of privacy as something which only muddies the water, distracting time and energy from the core issue. It profits nothing.
And as a final note, and seperate from the blanket protection of my disclaimer (meaning you my reader may feel free to throw a fit about this final ccomment without fear of saliva-dampend shoes), why is it that someone always seems to find a way to blow things like this completely 1) out of proportion and 2) way off course from it's initial heading.
[Edit: Ohh, lets see. Fixed two broken links, clarified something, fixed a spelling error, a grammatical error, reworded a sentance for clarity and added a following sentance for the purposes of underscoring a point.
I put way too much effort into these things.]
[Edit: Fixed a spelling error in my last edit note.
See what I mean?]
[Edit: Fixed a glaring grammatical error I missed yesterday which, contrary to the avowed mission statement in my disclaimer above - specifically that I say what I mean - I managed at one point through this error to say the exact opposite of what I meant. While I suppose my intent was made clear through the context of the post as a whole, I thought I'd alter it just in case. As I said: Waaaaayyy too much effort, considering no one is likely to read this newly editted post now that it isn't on the last page.
![Smiley: tongue](//zam.zamimg.com/i/smilies/tongue.gif)
]
Edited, Fri Jan 7 16:27:44 2005 by nataraja