Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Howto use images in your postFollow

QuoteReply
#27 Aug 28 2007 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1616977010829
View User Forum
Sage
*****
13,880 posts
Senjiow the Mundane wrote:
Elderon wrote:
Remember kids, somehow you are now allowed to post 9 images in one post at a maximum of 1200px X 1200px. Also, you can add 9 more in your sigs. That's 25,920,000 square pixels of prime internet real estate.


Unbelievable.


Leave it to a twunt like you to advertise so you can get sheep to do your bidding.
Yes, that's always the goal of making a blatant bug report in the ADMIN FEEDBACK FORUM in the thread to do with said new functionality. Yes, I could see how that would be confusing to some people like you.

Smiley: rolleyes
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#28 Aug 28 2007 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1592347380152
View User Forum
Sage
******
26,516 posts
Also, the cropping/resizing stuff doesn't seem to be working.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#29 Aug 28 2007 at 12:14 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1657498616216
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
10,012 posts
Nevermind, there's a sticky for the problems.

Edited, Aug 28th 2007 3:15pm by Kaelesh
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#30 Aug 28 2007 at 12:14 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591823853175
Scholar
****
5,870 posts
Elderon wrote:
Senjiow the Mundane wrote:
Elderon wrote:
Remember kids, somehow you are now allowed to post 9 images in one post at a maximum of 1200px X 1200px. Also, you can add 9 more in your sigs. That's 25,920,000 square pixels of prime internet real estate.


Unbelievable.


Leave it to a twunt like you to advertise so you can get sheep to do your bidding.
Yes, that's always the goal of making a blatant bug report in the ADMIN FEEDBACK FORUM in the thread to do with said new functionality. Yes, I could see how that would be confusing to some people like you.

Smiley: rolleyes


Oh, like the post in =4, or the post in =28 twice? Yea, gee, how did I miss those. OH, and then there is the STICKY at the top of the page about image uploader issues. Try again.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#31 Aug 28 2007 at 12:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Danalog
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
unmute
____________________________
Do what now?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#32 Aug 28 2007 at 12:17 PM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1596990078323
View User Forum
Sage
*****
19,727 posts
Thank you.

I'm sorry.

Vultures need to eat, too.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#33 Aug 28 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Default
Usagi
View User Forum
Living on a Prayer
******
30,114 posts
Smiley: lol Jophiel's Sig
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#34 Aug 28 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1592270513143
View User Forum
Sage
******
22,688 posts
Senjiow the Mundane wrote:
Elderon wrote:
Senjiow the Mundane wrote:
Elderon wrote:
Remember kids, somehow you are now allowed to post 9 images in one post at a maximum of 1200px X 1200px. Also, you can add 9 more in your sigs. That's 25,920,000 square pixels of prime internet real estate.


Unbelievable.


Leave it to a twunt like you to advertise so you can get sheep to do your bidding.
Yes, that's always the goal of making a blatant bug report in the ADMIN FEEDBACK FORUM in the thread to do with said new functionality. Yes, I could see how that would be confusing to some people like you.

Smiley: rolleyes


Oh, like the post in =4, or the post in =28 twice? Yea, gee, how did I miss those. OH, and then there is the STICKY at the top of the page about image uploader issues. Try again.

The best part of finding a bug is exploiting it a bit for extra lulz.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#35 Aug 28 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Grandfather Barkingturtle
August 28th, 2007 2:40pm - August 28th, 2007 3:16pm

We will never forget.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#36 Aug 28 2007 at 12:23 PM Rating: Good
RedPhoenixxx
View User Forum
Sage
****
7,735 posts
Those were the days...

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#37 Aug 28 2007 at 12:24 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1592270513143
View User Forum
Sage
******
22,688 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Grandfather Barkingturtle
August 28th, 2007 2:40pm - August 28th, 2007 3:16pm

We will never forget.

After work tonight, I'm going to get a tattoo of the number 2160 on my back.

Edited, Aug 28th 2007 4:24pm by Mindel
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#38 Aug 28 2007 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591823853175
Scholar
****
5,870 posts
Mindel wrote:
The best part of finding a bug is exploiting it a bit for extra lulz.


Meh, a simple, "Hey, I noticed this." would have been fine. It's bad enough people are still using archaic 56k connections, then add IE to it and someone intentionally breaking pages makes for unhappy browsers.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#39 Aug 28 2007 at 12:30 PM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1701044194859
Guru
*****
12,735 posts
Screenshot


Hello, I'm Exodus, and I approve of this forum upgrade.

Smiley: thumbsup
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#40 Aug 28 2007 at 12:32 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592339379379
View User Forum
Scholar
****
5,714 posts
The resizing thing seems to mess with PNG transparency for some reason.

See, I have this cool picture of a wavy sausage with a nice bit of outer glow going on that I want to use for my sig. But when I upload it with that resizing thing, it goes all weird and looks crap.

Here's how it should be.

And here's how it looks when your uploading system has butchered it:

Screenshot


Smiley: mad
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#41 Aug 28 2007 at 12:33 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1655684310366
Sage
****
4,348 posts
I can't make a userbar in my siggy ;_;

It keeps saying its too small (>96px)
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#42 Aug 28 2007 at 12:35 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1655684310366
Sage
****
4,348 posts
-.- forgot to take that out of my sig. I did it wrong the first time.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#43 Aug 28 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Excellent
__DEL__1701044194859
Guru
*****
12,735 posts
Ok...not liking images in sigs.

this is starting to feel like another KillingIfrit.

Just without the lag.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#44 Aug 28 2007 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592339379379
View User Forum
Scholar
****
5,714 posts
Sir Exodus wrote:
Ok...not liking images in sigs.

this is starting to feel like another KillingIfrit.

Just without the lag.

If I can get my sausage sig working it will be the only thing in my sig and will look really neat and everything
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#45 Aug 28 2007 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1655684310366
Sage
****
4,348 posts
Fyi:
The pic I want to use in my siggy: Pic.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#46 Aug 28 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sig images allow for passive-aggressive protesting.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#47 Aug 28 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1657498616216
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
10,012 posts
I would suggest that you click your "Hide Images" box and request that it be a separate option from a "Hide Avatars" option. Limiting the IMGs in sigs to the WoW or FFXI sig size would be fine by me.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#48 Aug 28 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592339379379
View User Forum
Scholar
****
5,714 posts
Whaods, Star Breaker wrote:
Fyi:
The pic I want to use in my siggy: Pic.

People still use those lame little banners? Smiley: lol
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#49 Aug 28 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1616977010829
View User Forum
Sage
*****
13,880 posts
Sillygooose wrote:
The resizing thing seems to mess with PNG transparency for some reason.

See, I have this cool picture of a wavy sausage with a nice bit of outer glow going on that I want to use for my sig. But when I upload it with that resizing thing, it goes all weird and looks crap.

Here's how it should be.

And here's how it looks when your uploading system has butchered it:

Screenshot


Smiley: mad
The server put a condom on your sausage for you. You should be thankful for their diligence.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#50 Aug 28 2007 at 12:42 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592339379379
View User Forum
Scholar
****
5,714 posts
Elderon wrote:
Sillygooose wrote:
The resizing thing seems to mess with PNG transparency for some reason.

See, I have this cool picture of a wavy sausage with a nice bit of outer glow going on that I want to use for my sig. But when I upload it with that resizing thing, it goes all weird and looks crap.

Here's how it should be.

And here's how it looks when your uploading system has butchered it:

Screenshot


Smiley: mad
The server put a condom on your sausage for you. You should be thankful for their diligence.


Screenshot
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#51 Aug 28 2007 at 12:59 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592764346135
Scholar
***
2,652 posts
I would like to request that if images are allowed to be added to places such as signitures and such that I be able to disable signitures totally.

You could:

Simply allow me to disable signiture images. This is a quick direct fix.

or

Disallow them completely. However allowing image signitures to premium members may bring in additional site income. so disallowing signiture images may not be the best idea.

or

Allow premium members to disable viewing any signature whatsoever.
The reason I should be able to disable seeing signatures as a premium member seem like a fair alternative. This feature may also bring in even more additional subscriptions for people who dislike all of the signature garbage. It is almost as bad as banner ads. So why not allow us to disable it as a premium.

I ask you, who really cares what is written or what image is in a persons signature? Just the owner. If that.

Let me filter out the fluff completely, signature text and images in one fell swoop.
▲ Page top
1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 73 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (73)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC