·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Wowhead/ZAM Fantasy Football League 2011
Wowhead/ZAM Fantasy Football League 2011Follow
I'm screwed. I hope swap/trade options are fairly liberal.
Lulz, totally forgot about the draft. I hope the autorankings were halfway decent.
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
Lulz, totally forgot about the draft. I hope the autorankings were halfway decent.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
I'm not too happy with mine, but it's my own fault for not changing up my preferences :P.
◕ ‿‿ ◕
I have to say, I like ESPN's format better. Either way, this should be fun, even if a few of us totally forgot about the draft.
I really don't care for FleaFlicker so far.
Also, I wish everyone would actually try to set a team each week. Looks like some people have flat out given up and it's only week 2. Multiple teams starting players who have been ruled out for a while, not just gametime decisions. While I'm glad it is a large league since I signed up late, next season should probably be limited to 12-14 teams. That leaves a lot more players open on the FA list to try to retool your team if things are no good the first few weeks, and keeps people trying to play competitively for longer.
Also, I wish everyone would actually try to set a team each week. Looks like some people have flat out given up and it's only week 2. Multiple teams starting players who have been ruled out for a while, not just gametime decisions. While I'm glad it is a large league since I signed up late, next season should probably be limited to 12-14 teams. That leaves a lot more players open on the FA list to try to retool your team if things are no good the first few weeks, and keeps people trying to play competitively for longer.
I've always felt that Yahoo has the best Fantasy Football system. Haven't tried NFL.com's recently, though. But it seems like Yahoo has the best combination of features, presentation, and options. They seem to be ahead of the rest of the pack when it comes to adding new elements, too.
We did ESPN last year in one league, and it had some obnoxiously bad webpage design in a few areas (and at the time, they were charging $5.00 for their mobile app!).
Edited, Sep 18th 2011 10:07pm by Eske
We did ESPN last year in one league, and it had some obnoxiously bad webpage design in a few areas (and at the time, they were charging $5.00 for their mobile app!).
Edited, Sep 18th 2011 10:07pm by Eske
Eske Esquire wrote:
I've always felt that Yahoo has the best Fantasy Football system. Haven't tried NFL.com's recently, though. But it seems like Yahoo has the best combination of features, presentation, and options. They seem to be ahead of the rest of the pack when it comes to adding new elements, too.
We did ESPN last year in one league, and it had some obnoxiously bad webpage design in a few areas (and at the time, they were charging $5.00 for their mobile app!).
Edited, Sep 18th 2011 10:07pm by Eske
We did ESPN last year in one league, and it had some obnoxiously bad webpage design in a few areas (and at the time, they were charging $5.00 for their mobile app!).
Edited, Sep 18th 2011 10:07pm by Eske
Yahoo and NFL.com are both very good fantasy FB platforms. CBSSports.com isn't bad either.
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam
Sedao
Sedao
I honestly just hate the fleaflicker design and can't figure out some stuff, so I kinda stopped caring -_-. If we do it again next year and use Yahoo I'll be all in though.
◕ ‿‿ ◕
I've been on nfl.com for the last two years, and I like it.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
I think the design is terrible, but I haven't had any trouble finding stuff or setting my team or adding/dropping players.
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
I think the design is terrible, but I haven't had any trouble finding stuff or setting my team or adding/dropping players.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
I'm still kind of learning the ropes. I did try to set a up a lineup this week and I had a guy be injured for start time that 0 really Not that it matters too much because I believe I still got my *** kicked.
I have to tout my score this week:
Matthew Stafford 23.93
Jeremy Maclin 23.85
A.J. Green 15.70
Devery Henderson 12.90
Peyton Hillis 14.85
Arian Foster 2.50
Fred Davis 10.80
Stephen Gostkowski 9.00
Detroit 21.00
James Anderson 3.50
Clay Matthews 5.00
Tommy Kelly 0.50
Mario Williams 2.00
Aqib Talib 1.00
Donte Whitner 8.00
Total
Projected: 87.46
Actual: 154.53
Damn near doubled my projected (and 75 pts is about the average weekly total in our league). Absolutely steamrolled my opponent, who had the second highest score with 110.
Booyakasha.
Matthew Stafford 23.93
Jeremy Maclin 23.85
A.J. Green 15.70
Devery Henderson 12.90
Peyton Hillis 14.85
Arian Foster 2.50
Fred Davis 10.80
Stephen Gostkowski 9.00
Detroit 21.00
James Anderson 3.50
Clay Matthews 5.00
Tommy Kelly 0.50
Mario Williams 2.00
Aqib Talib 1.00
Donte Whitner 8.00
Total
Projected: 87.46
Actual: 154.53
Damn near doubled my projected (and 75 pts is about the average weekly total in our league). Absolutely steamrolled my opponent, who had the second highest score with 110.
Booyakasha.
I wish there was a setting to force inactive teams to at least set the highest projected lineup.
Yea yea, whatever. Just back off, that division is mine!
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Yea yea, whatever. Just back off, that division is mine!
My win this week was pure fluke. 3 of my starters were on bye. Of course, that's the kind of thing you need from time to time to stay near the top.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
My win this week was pure fluke. 3 of my starters were on bye. Of course, that's the kind of thing you need from time to time to stay near the top.
I'd really like to just blow up the inactive teams and send their players to waivers. There isn't a whole lot the people actually trying to win can do to supplement their rosters. 20 teams eats up a lot of players.
Edited, Oct 10th 2011 2:46pm by Spoonless
I'd love to see all the players on the inactive teams just go to free agency/waivers.
Waivers would really be best, so we would basically have to draft them. Oh, and apparently it's 8 inactive teams, though the top two could feasibly have just used a Ron Popeil strategy 'til their players are on byes.
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
I'd love to see all the players on the inactive teams just go to free agency/waivers.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
I'd love to see all the players on the inactive teams just go to free agency/waivers.
Seriously. That's why no-drop lists exist.
◕ ‿‿ ◕
Playing in a work league and the person I beat last week has an open RB slot and had two players on bye. I want their Greg Jennings. Especially since Roy Williams is garbage.
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
I'd love to see all the players on the inactive teams just go to free agency/waivers.
Recent Visitors: 398
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (398)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Wowhead/ZAM Fantasy Football League 2011
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC