Nilatai wrote:
I don't think gbaji likes it when people propose different meanings for words.
In general, a bit. In this specific case, I've watched this "definition" of insanity appear out of nowhere and become a popular method to attack anything that someone doesn't agree with by linking it with insanity. Worse, they often kinda gloss over the "trying the same thing" and re-interpret that to mean "trying to achieve the same thing". The reality is that most successes worth achieving in this history of man only happened after the person trying to succeed failed over and over until he finally got it right.
But what I've seen is this snarky definition being used to declare anyone trying to do something but who has not yet succeeded as "insane". It's just gotten to the point where it irritates me when someone pops up with it because it's not just wrong, but it's 180 degrees wrong. Determination is a good thing, and we honestly need more of it, and I just don't see the value in inventing a bogus definition in order to attack it.