Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

[Poll] Forum Merge?Follow

#202 May 05 2009 at 8:01 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Professor Lemmi wrote:
So basically you're saying it was lazy moderation that led to this, and now the community should be punished?


YES. Plus people's feelings were hurt and we should honor every precious snowflake that floats in our midst.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#203 May 05 2009 at 8:02 PM Rating: Decent
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.
#204 May 05 2009 at 8:03 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Professor Lemmi wrote:
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.


Yeah, but getting upset about it does nothing and just pisses off the admins. I like Darqflame and she has enough aggravation without worrying about us.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#205 May 05 2009 at 8:04 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Professor Lemmi wrote:
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.


it actually started out that way. We used to have rules at the top of the forum (no cussing etc etc) but as the forum grew so did our balls. >.>

On one hand I love how lively this has gotten but on the other hand, why are we still ******** our pants over the asylum?
#206 May 05 2009 at 8:05 PM Rating: Decent
Because forcing people to move is going to tear the community of regular posters we have here.
#207 May 05 2009 at 8:05 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
niobia wrote:
Professor Lemmi wrote:
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.


it actually started out that way. We used to have rules at the top of the forum (no cussing etc etc) but as the forum grew so did our balls. >.>

On one hand I love how lively this has gotten but on the other hand, why are we still sh*tting our pants over the asylum?


I don't think we are. I just don't think people are all that enthusiastic about posting in that forum.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#208 May 05 2009 at 8:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Like I said, the clear solution is to just have them both redirect to the same forum, and keep the forum titles the same, giving the OoTers the illusion of still posting in the OoT and the Asylumites the illusion of still posting in the Asylum.

The main issue I see with a merger is that the Asylum is quite a bit slower than the OoT. With all the nonsensical threads in the OoT moving in on the Asylum, many of the threads that would normally stay on the first page of the Asylum would quickly disappear. The Asylum fills a page of threads in maybe a week, the OoT does it in a day. I can see how Asylumites that choose not to frequent the OoT could end up leaving the forum.
#209 May 05 2009 at 8:12 PM Rating: Good
Warchief Annabella wrote:
niobia wrote:
Professor Lemmi wrote:
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.


it actually started out that way. We used to have rules at the top of the forum (no cussing etc etc) but as the forum grew so did our balls. >.>

On one hand I love how lively this has gotten but on the other hand, why are we still sh*tting our pants over the asylum?


I don't think we are. I just don't think people are all that enthusiastic about posting in that forum.
=4 is like a crew of old folks playing bridge while =28 is a college party. They don't function the same.
#210 May 05 2009 at 8:13 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Like I said, the clear solution is to just have them both redirect to the same forum, and keep the forum titles the same, giving the OoTers the illusion of still posting in the OoT and the Asylumites the illusion of still posting in the Asylum.


It was much better when I thought that this was derisive sarcasm and not a serious suggestion :(
#211 May 05 2009 at 8:16 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Duke Ikkian wrote:
Warchief Annabella wrote:
niobia wrote:
Professor Lemmi wrote:
If you're going to have a play nice baby forum, may as well do it right from the beginning and keep an eye on it.


it actually started out that way. We used to have rules at the top of the forum (no cussing etc etc) but as the forum grew so did our balls. >.>

On one hand I love how lively this has gotten but on the other hand, why are we still sh*tting our pants over the asylum?


I don't think we are. I just don't think people are all that enthusiastic about posting in that forum.
=4 is like a crew of old folks playing bridge while =28 is a college party. They don't function the same.


I don't know if that's true. I think it's just two different groups of people. Realistically, creating a new forum won't solve the problem. Directing provocative threads would. However, to be fair, BT's provocative thread didn't violate the rules of the forum. Neither did Mindel's. So I am not sure why it's become this discussion again.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#212 May 05 2009 at 8:24 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
However, to be fair, BT's provocative thread didn't violate the rules of the forum. Neither did Mindel's. So I am not sure why it's become this discussion again.


Because it's something to ***** about. Come on that was easy.
#213 May 05 2009 at 8:27 PM Rating: Decent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
However, to be fair, BT's provocative thread didn't violate the rules of the forum. Neither did Mindel's. So I am not sure why it's become this discussion again.


Because it's something to ***** about. Come on that was easy.


Yeah, it's funny. It's just a repeat of a discussion we've already had. I think that the admins have a point. I just wouldn't have chosen that time to mute him if I wanted to make a larger point about enforcing community rules. I think that was what was weird about it. There was about a million other times to discuss it.

But, hey, what do I know? I just spend much of my career moderating small groups of people.

Edited, May 6th 2009 12:28am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#214 May 05 2009 at 8:32 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Like I said, the clear solution is to just have them both redirect to the same forum, and keep the forum titles the same, giving the OoTers the illusion of still posting in the OoT and the Asylumites the illusion of still posting in the Asylum.


It was much better when I thought that this was derisive sarcasm and not a serious suggestion :(
Smiley: laugh Like they'd ever do it.
#215 May 05 2009 at 8:32 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,811 posts
I really don't think my wit is fast enough, or lack of wit to post in the Asylum.

I feel dumb in there.
#216 May 05 2009 at 8:37 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
But, hey, what do I know? I just spend much of my career moderating small groups of people.


Are you being sarcastic twice, sarcastic once, or sarcastic not at all?

Quote:
I think that the admins have a point. I just wouldn't have chosen that time to mute him if I wanted to make a larger point about enforcing community rules. I think that was what was weird about it. There was about a million other times to discuss it.


The rules have never been clear or uniformly enforced. Why start making sense about it now?

Edited, May 6th 2009 12:38am by Pensive
#217 May 05 2009 at 8:37 PM Rating: Good
GrowlingBunny wrote:
I really don't think my wit is fast enough, or lack of wit to post in the Asylum.

I feel dumb in there.


Think of it this way: you're just as stupid here as you are in there. You don't change, only the forum does. Intelligence is measured realtive to the entirety of humanity, not a small group.

OK, who else needs some therapy?
#218 May 05 2009 at 8:39 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Quote:


Are you being sarcastic twice, sarcastic once, or sarcastic not at all?


Probably once.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#219 May 05 2009 at 8:42 PM Rating: Excellent
I've read both of their posts over a few times, and BT and Mindel really didn't do anything out of line to be muted. What happened in each of their situations was they called out Kao, and instead of replying or trying to reason with them, he got wound up in yet another power trip and muted them as a somewhat pathetic knee-jerk flex of power. At worst, BT said ****, without breaking the filter.

Now all of this forum merging and enforcing nonsense is really not the real issue here. The OOT has operated like it has for a long time now, and admins have come and go, allowing it to remain the way it is. This is more of a punishment for the admins being called out about the Conan contest, and the two posts questioning Kao. Had that Conan contest fiasco never happened, we would not be here at this point in time, I can guarantee that. It's really sad that the entire community of this forum will be punished and separated over something so trivial.
#220 May 05 2009 at 8:42 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Okay, then I'll ask as nicely as I can what you could have been meaning by that, seeing as how a forum is an extremely large group of people. Well I guess technically it's a declaration of a question but whatever. I was really not sure if you were trying to poke fun at yourself or at the administration Smiley: frown

***

Quote:
This is more of a punishment for the admins being called out about the Conan contest, and the two posts questioning Kao. Had that Conan contest fiasco never happened, we would not be here at this point in time, I can guarantee that.


Smiley: dubious

Edited, May 6th 2009 12:44am by Pensive
#221 May 05 2009 at 8:50 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Okay, then I'll ask as nicely as I can what you could have been meaning by that, seeing as how a forum is an extremely large group of people. Well I guess technically it's a declaration of a question but whatever. I was really not sure if you were trying to poke fun at yourself or at the administration Smiley: frown


The OOT regulars aren't a very big group of people and I think all the time about managing groups and dynamics between members. It applies here. That's all I was saying.

I work with alot of adolescents but these rules apply for adults. All these powerful feelings and dynamics occur among any groups of adults. It's human nature. I choose my battles with them. It makes my job easier and makes the enforcement of the rules more comprehensible for both parties. I think, as a piece of advice, that they might consider thinking structurally going forward and doing less disciplining of past transgressions. Like the admins don't weaken their position by admitting they might have erred. They are just honest to us and themselves.

In the end, it's not a big deal. Sure. I can understand their frustration. I'm just saying, based on my experience and training on group work, that's my advice. And I think it's clear. When it becomes this issue of us being bad kids, I think it just creates alot of easily avoidable tension and ill will.

I figure they won't listen to me, that's why I said what I said. People don't like hearing that if something is unmanageable, usually that's a problem of management who are more culpable than the people they are managing. If the kids in my groups act out or violate rules, that's my responsibility. It's not meant to blame, but more like I hope people will think about their roles and what will be helpful in improving the situation.




Edited, May 6th 2009 12:56am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#222 May 05 2009 at 8:56 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,966 posts
gbaji wrote:
A wall of text that stayed on topic, made sense and that I agree with.





I also rated him up.


I feel dirty.



Leave the forums as they are.



If someone is way beyond the PG-13 envelope, karma bomb them and mute them for a while. Don't punish the community, punish the asshats causing the problem.


And quit getting annoyed (Admins) if we use them thar arrows. I rate up and down pretty much equally, but if I am nailing a particular poster DOWN it's because I think thay deserve it. Isn't that how them arrows are supposed to work?


/thread
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#223 May 05 2009 at 9:00 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,811 posts
Kavekk wrote:
GrowlingBunny wrote:
I really don't think my wit is fast enough, or lack of wit to post in the Asylum.

I feel dumb in there.


Think of it this way: you're just as stupid here as you are in there. You don't change, only the forum does. Intelligence is measured realtive to the entirety of humanity, not a small group.

OK, who else needs some therapy?



WOW! Sweetie, you HAVE to take that on the road. Really. Good Motivational Speakers are hard to find.

You have a gift!
#224 May 05 2009 at 9:03 PM Rating: Decent
Sorry, Bijou, you're not allowed to /thread yourself. If we let people do that, we'd have anarchy. Anarchy and lolcats.
#225 May 05 2009 at 9:07 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,966 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Sorry, Bijou, you're not allowed to /thread yourself. If we let people do that, we'd have anarchy. Anarchy and lolcats.



Oops. sorry.












[:bitteraracnosocialistcommuneface:]
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#226 May 05 2009 at 9:09 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
MERGING DOES *** ALL TO CHANGE THE SITUATION!

Explain how merging is any different then it would be now of telling posters to post in the proper forum and moving and/or locking their threads. Please explain this to me because I don't see how it's any different.


ADD ANOTHER FORUM? PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT

There's a WoW General Forum for WoW stuff. Should we separate it into two different forums, one for the newbs and one for the elitist bastards? What's the point? FFXI General and FFXI Sergeant, one is more hardcore than the other. To hell with moderation let's bring back the days of forum=lawlforumcreationexploit and let everyone do whatever they want wherever they want.


It's simple, moderators need to moderate according to each forums rules. Posters have been warned multiple times and without hardly any follow through. You ask if the community should be punished for a lack of proper moderation. I ask you 'has the community broken the rules?' The answer is yes.

If rules don't have consequences they aren't really rules. Alla needs to grow some balls and start taking proper action. People will whine and cry and throw a fit. Boohoo. All children do, they're testing and learning your limits. These forums aren't any different. Eventually they'll learn and live with it or move onto somewhere else. Either way it doesn't matter. But there's no reason to create another forum because it's like throwing more kindle to the fire. If you can't even moderate one forum what makes you think adding another is somehow going to magically fix the problems?
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 497 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (497)