Katie, Pie Eating Champion wrote:
You are ruining my "rate stubs down" mentality. 
Start being a cnut again.
Start being a cnut again. Contrary to popular belief, I don't try to be an asshole. It just happens naturally more often than not.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Consensus on Global Warming?
Consensus on Global Warming?Follow
Contrary to popular belief, I don't try to be an asshole. It just happens naturally more often than not.
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I wish Global Warming was completely debunked. I'd be happier.
Why?
Seriously?
Yeah seriously. Even if "global warming" as a doomsday concept didn't exist, all of the debauchery leading up to it is still bad for us in general. For years we've been polluting our breathable air, drinkable water, and inhabitable land with the waste of our poor resource management practices. Even if global warming WAS a hoax, we've still got a boatload of other problems to deal with, not the least of which is our limited fossil fuel supply which, completely independent of other factors, could be the downfall of our civilization if we don't find a better than adequate solution, and sooner rather than later.
Bizarro logic that really only lends credence to idiots like gbaji who would argue that global warming is a far-reaching conspiracy of control. Seriously, don't display an attitude that could be construed as appreciative of global warming; it just confirms what the wackjobs behind this pseudo-petition claim. Of course, it's right in line with your typical lack of faith in humanity to believe that we as a planet need this Sword of Damacles hanging over us in order to facilitate change.
That's like saying that if Dyadem didn't have AIDS, he wouldn't be properly motivated to not share needles, let strange men **** in his butt or take every precaution against pneumonia. That may be a bad example, but it's a funny one nonetheless.
Edited, May 21st 2008 7:40am by Barkingturtle
Barkingturtle wrote:
Bizarro logic
Self-fulfilling prophecy, much?
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Bizarro logic
Self-fulfilling prophecy, much?
Okay Stubs.
I must be pretty awesome to have you feeling so trapped after one post that you're already resorting to "I know you are but what am I?"
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
Technically speaking, I'd be a scientist by those rules. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering.
I reject Al Gores claims. Add me to the list of Scientists that disagree.
I reject Al Gores claims. Add me to the list of Scientists that disagree.
So could I, so could millions of Americans. However only about 30 thousand did.
The fact remains however, that the climate scientists that the worlds governing bodies turn to, have come to different conclusions than Singer and gang.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Barkingturtle wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Bizarro logic
Self-fulfilling prophecy, much?
Okay Stubs.
I must be pretty awesome to have you feeling so trapped after one post that you're already resorting to "I know you are but what am I?"
I'm not trapped. Your logic was a fallacy.
I said:
The problem would exist even without "global warming", so why do you wish it to go away?
You interpreted:
Without global warming, nobody would realize or address the problem, so it's good to have it looming over our heads.
You misunderstood. It happens. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Bizarro logic
Self-fulfilling prophecy, much?
Okay Stubs.
I must be pretty awesome to have you feeling so trapped after one post that you're already resorting to "I know you are but what am I?"
I'm not trapped. Your logic was a fallacy.
I said:
The problem would exist even without "global warming", so why do you wish it to go away?
You interpreted:
Without global warming, nobody would realize or address the problem, so it's good to have it looming over our heads.
You misunderstood. It happens. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
And were back full circle.
BrownDuck wrote:
I'm not trapped. Your logic was a fallacy.
I said:
The problem would exist even without "global warming", so why do you wish it to go away?
Uh huh.
That's uh, no better. The "problem" of global warming wouldn't exist if global warming weren't real. We'd have other problems.
Why wish it gone? Pretty simple: it would be one less potentially cataclysmic event.
You are embodying exactly what the National Center for Anxiety guy claims believers in global warming are truly motivated by. You have good intentions, sure, but the ends don't always justify the means, especially when they give guys like gbaji ammunition.
Azazel, Immortal Lion wrote:
I have an opinion, but it's not strong because I don't know the facts.
I think it's funny how Al Gore is going on and on about Global Warming and saying it's true. This is coming from the same man who says he invented the Internet.
I think it's funny how Al Gore is going on and on about Global Warming and saying it's true. This is coming from the same man who says he invented the Internet.
If it's good enough for Vin Cerf, it's good enough for me.
Quote:
Vinton G. Cerf, a senior vice president at MCI Worldcom and the person most often called "the father of the Internet" for his part in designing the network's common computer language, said in an e-mail interview yesterday, "I think it is very fair to say that the Internet would not be where it is in the United States without the strong support given to it and related research areas by the vice president in his current role and in his earlier role as senator."
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
I can't believe that in 2008, after even Big Oil admits to global warming, that anyone is arguing this stuff. Seriously. The Oregon Petition. Signed by scientists. Oh, look, 9000 Ph. D. level scientists have signed it--even ones that are not qualified or knowledgeable about the climate or the effects of pollution. Wow, that's so ************* relevant.
Why are we still discussing this sh*t?
Edited, May 21st 2008 11:47am by Annabella
Why are we still discussing this sh*t?
Edited, May 21st 2008 11:47am by Annabella
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Elinda wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
I reject Al Gores claims. Add me to the list of Scientists that disagree.
So could I, so could millions of Americans. However only about 30 thousand did.
Needless to say, I was not very impressed.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Barkingturtle wrote:
especially when they give guys like gbaji ammunition.
Well at least he's not shooting blanks.
Quote:
Why are we still discussing this sh*t?
Personally i think it would take a significant shift in the North Alantic Current to convince some people, even then i'm not sure some would believe.
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:
Why are we still discussing this sh*t?
Personally i think it would take a significant shift in the North Alantic Current to convince some people, even then i'm not sure some would believe.
The Day After Tomorrow was a decent movie, but
. Quote:
The Day After Tomorrow was a decent movie, but
BrownDuck wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
especially when they give guys like gbaji ammunition.
Well at least he's not shooting blanks.
It's okay Stubs. I never expect you to consider or understand the ramifications of your opinions, in the same way I don't expect you to man up when you're shown to have faulty thinking. It's what makes you such a wonderful toy, after all.
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:
Why are we still discussing this sh*t?
Personally i think it would take a significant shift in the North Alantic Current to convince some people, even then i'm not sure some would believe.
Maybe. Personally, I think it has more to do with the fact that a lot of people in my country would much rather not take responsibility for their actions and don't want to change their ways.
Quote:
Maybe. Personally, I think it has more to do with the fact that a lot of people in my country would much rather not take responsibility for their actions and don't want to change their ways.
Unfortunately we have to wait till tomorrow to get Gbaji's reply
There won't be a reply. You guys don't understand Gbaji at all.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
Unfortunately we have to wait till tomorrow to get Gbaji's reply
There won't be a reply. You guys don't understand Gbaji at all.
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
Unfortunately we have to wait till tomorrow to get Gbaji's reply
There won't be a reply. You guys don't understand Gbaji at all.
The part where he'll drop this topic for now and declare in six months that he was right.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Or the part where he doesn't attempt to comprehend any side of the argument but his own
Now you're confusing Smash and Gbaji.
Samira wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
Unfortunately we have to wait till tomorrow to get Gbaji's reply
There won't be a reply. You guys don't understand Gbaji at all.
The part where he'll drop this topic for now and declare in six months that he was right.
BrownDuck wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Or the part where he doesn't attempt to comprehend any side of the argument but his own
Now you're confusing Smash and Gbaji.
Quote:
Smash is a better arguer than you. Just sayin.
Recent Visitors: 275
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (275)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Consensus on Global Warming?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC