Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Instance QuestionFollow

#1 May 19 2007 at 2:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
OK so I have a mid-lvl lock but I'll admit I don't know everything about them, especially what's up with locks around lvl 60-70 or so.

I was in a Shattered Halls run last night (Group composition: Me (tanking), Hunter, Rogue, Warlock, Priest).

Why, in that scenario, would a warlock use a VW? I'm used to imps or succubi (?) with the occasional felhunter when dealing with casters. Seems like we had CC/OT going on but again, I don't know late game lock styles. What's the strategy so that I can know what I need to worry about/be aware of as the tank.

Thanks!



#2 May 19 2007 at 2:57 PM Rating: Default
**
992 posts
A tanking Voidwalker is VERY simple to use. All you have to do is make sure it switches targets fairly often so the others don't pull healing aggro. Pop Suffering whenever it's up, too. Don't even have to click your aggro generator all the time.
#3 May 19 2007 at 3:35 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
ecirphsoj wrote:
A tanking Voidwalker is VERY simple to use. All you have to do is make sure it switches targets fairly often so the others don't pull healing aggro. Pop Suffering whenever it's up, too. Don't even have to click your aggro generator all the time.


OK I get that. I guess I wasn't clear. I was the tank as a paladin. We had a hunter with all the CC/OT that traps and the pet. We also had CC in the form of sap. So when I mark am I supposed to give the VW it's own target? We really didn't have enough targets to go around often only pulling one or two at a time (that weren't sapped or trapped). With a hunter and a VW out, when there are (or will be) only 2 loose targets, which one do I assign the OT responsibilities to?

#4 May 21 2007 at 12:46 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
So can I assume that you're all as flummoxed as I as to what to assign the VW in a group/instance of that nature?

#5 May 21 2007 at 1:07 AM Rating: Decent
*
86 posts
Well, I only have a midlevel warlock myself, so I can't really say why there was a VW out in this situation. Normally in an instance group I will ask my group what pet they would like me to have out - esp if it's a PUG because I like to make sure I know a little of what everyone elses playstyle is.

Normally the only reason I would have my VW out is if the group is missing a real Off Tank and need me to pick up healer aggro when the tank is tied up with a boss or other mob. Otherwise I would normally just have the imp - apart from stamina buff until I respec he also lowers my threat which works well for most groups.
#6 May 21 2007 at 4:25 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
Using a VW to tank, even off tank, and instance couldn't be a good thing from what I know. I admit I am affliction and hardly ever use my VW. He's just too squishy for me.
#7 May 21 2007 at 6:47 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,877 posts
Was it a PUG? I have had endless issues with TankaDins in the past(PUG only), and in that group setup I think I may know why the VW was chosen. This is not a slam on any player, but the bottom line is Tankadins are not the best tanks avaiable. Sure when everybody knows each other, and nobody is in a hurry it works out just fine, yet if you look closely at that lineup you may see why the VW was chosen. A hunter can shed all the thret in the world ever 30 seconds with Fein Death, a Rogue can Feint or vanish, a priest can fade, and you want aggro, so what is it that a lock can do when they get aggro? Eat it thats what, Soulshatter dont realy count as aggro managment(in this context), not when every other source of DPS can litiraly dump aggro every 30 seconds or so without a large pricetag. For me, far too often the Pally uses conceration, the priest/druid/shaman/pally heals the Tankadin and it is all over, the Heal regesters more aggro than conceration and the mobs make a Bline for the priest, they pop Fade, but even in the best casethe situaion is not looking pretty for a "Ideal" start.

Secondly it could have been you were dealing with a Demo Lock who had the MD buff and he wanted to take 10% less damage, maybe they were out of shards and had to use the Abbsial shard to summon a VW(garbage logic the could have summoned a imp) and lastly, maybe the lock was kind of slow?

The only other thing i could immigine is that they were wanting to AoE and needed the sheild from a VW sac.
#8 May 21 2007 at 7:22 AM Rating: Decent
Celcio wrote:
ecirphsoj wrote:
A tanking Voidwalker is VERY simple to use. All you have to do is make sure it switches targets fairly often so the others don't pull healing aggro. Pop Suffering whenever it's up, too. Don't even have to click your aggro generator all the time.

OK I get that. I guess I wasn't clear. I was the tank as a paladin. We had a hunter with all the CC/OT that traps and the pet. We also had CC in the form of sap. So when I mark am I supposed to give the VW it's own target? We really didn't have enough targets to go around often only pulling one or two at a time (that weren't sapped or trapped). With a hunter and a VW out, when there are (or will be) only 2 loose targets, which one do I assign the OT responsibilities to?

Our groups are often mixed.

Star = tank
Moon = CC
Circle = off-tank (minion or pet #1)
Square = off-tank (minion or pet #2)
Diamond = spare

If there aren't enough targets to go around, minions and pets go to the next highest priority target. DPS goes on star fiirst, then circle, etc. When circle goes down, that minion/pet goes to diamond. Moon usually breaks CC about the time that the last marked mob goes down. If CC breaks early, it gets re-applied.

We save skull and triangle for patrols.
#9 May 21 2007 at 7:54 AM Rating: Default
If you have a lock in your party he shouldent ever use VW, even to tank. Tanking is YOUR job remember, not his pets who wont be able to hold aggro anyhow, so have him use succy if you need more CC or otherwise use Imp for stam buff. Since he was using VW i take it he wasnt demo spec. I 4 maned Shatt Halls with my felguard tanking up tell the 1st boss once when our tank dc'd and we got bored waiting for him lol, so it can happen (we had a mage/rogue too for max cc lol).

Demo locks should use felguard for dps, most other locks should use imp or succy.
#10 May 21 2007 at 10:20 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Capitolg wrote:
Secondly it could have been you were dealing with a Demo Lock who had the MD buff and he wanted to take 10% less damage, maybe they were out of shards and had to use the Abbsial shard to summon a VW(garbage logic the could have summoned a imp) and lastly, maybe the lock was kind of slow?

The only other thing i could immigine is that they were wanting to AoE and needed the sheild from a VW sac.


OK those make sense, I can see those. Thanks.

Quote:
Was it a PUG? I have had endless issues with TankaDins in the past(PUG only), and in that group setup I think I may know why the VW was chosen. This is not a slam on any player, but the bottom line is Tankadins are not the best tanks avaiable.


I sort of see where you're going here. I disagree with the last line (but I'm sure you expected that Smiley: grin) but I see where you're going.

I suspect you've gotten some bad paladin tanks there are many out there. I hope someday you get the opportunity to play with a good one.

#11 May 21 2007 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,877 posts
I have run with amazing Tankadins, but no matter what you say, they are not the preire tanking class of the game. they are a solid thrid place in the tanking game. If you think a Pally can outtank a prot spec warrior then we have some discrepinces. i still find a prot/arms warrior or a Beartank Druid setup to be prefreable to a TankaDin. I have run successfull heroics with a pally tank, but in that case it was a buddy of mine, and every person in the party knew each other. nobody had to wonder if one member of the party knew what they were doing. My point was not that pallies are crappy tanks, just that since some classes have a inate advantage in the tanking game(like say, Buit in extra thret) when playing with a alternetive tank, it takes more teamwork. Is that bad? no, I like when it is a bit more of a challange. But it sure would explain somebody trying to "Play it safe", that aside, I think it is silly to do a 5 man with VW unless you absolutly have to (like for one pull or something).
#12 May 21 2007 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
No, I'm not going to say that a paladin can outttank a prot spec warrior. But not for the reasons that you're saying it.

A paladin's shortfall in tanking is not the aggro gen. We have many, really nice, methods beyond consecration (which I rarely use, only if someone's AoEing really or if some other threat gen is on cooldown and that's the option) for getting and maintaining threat. Heck I rarely have to use my taunt though yes, in a PuG I have to use it more, but so does the warrior and bear.

The shortfall of a paladin tank is in the mitigation.

I can hold aggro all day long even in PuGs, but sometimes it can be a tad taxing on the healer. Not meaning they get aggro (usually it's only the Boomkin and melee shaman I have issues with), meaning it's hard on their mana pool.

I'm not saying that having the VW out because of lack of confidence isn't a valid reason, mind you. But the only problem a group should have with a paladin tank is them dying faster than a warrior. Is that always the case? Nope, there are some bad tanks out there who don't understand how paladin aggro gen works. The paladin should have to know that, it should be transparent to the group.

(here's a hint, if you see a paladin tank spamming consecration on every fight? They're probably a bad paladin tank)
#13 May 21 2007 at 11:38 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,877 posts
Quote:
if you see a paladin tank spamming consecration on every fight? They're probably a bad paladin tank


When i see a pally spamming Concecration i usualy leave the party. Too meny Jailbreak runs with crappy pallies(not even playing as tank) to ever let me forget it.
#14 May 21 2007 at 12:13 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,877 posts
Celcio, dont know who is karma bombing you, but i refreshed and saw that some of your posts lost rank, unforutnaly i took the only path i knew, just blindly rating up all your posts i see. so whoever the karma troll is, you may want to start rating me down as well because I will just re rate up Celcio(well unless said poster goes all Leetspeek on me)
#15 May 21 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Capitolg wrote:
Celcio, dont know who is karma bombing you, but i refreshed and saw that some of your posts lost rank, unforutnaly i took the only path i knew, just blindly rating up all your posts i see. so whoever the karma troll is, you may want to start rating me down as well because I will just re rate up Celcio(well unless said poster goes all Leetspeek on me)


Thk u! U r 2 knd.

(yeah like I'm going to resist that set-up Smiley: grin)

As for the karma, thanks but don't worry about it. I don't. I go up I go down. Sometimes, if it changes fast enough between green and red, I pretend I'm a christmas light bringing joy to a troubled world.

#16 May 21 2007 at 12:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,877 posts
Well the point is not to pamper you, but more that rating up and down is something to think about, not just because somebody disagreed with something you or i said....Every comment in this thred is quazi relevent and none of it desurves a rate down.
#17 May 21 2007 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Sorry I didn't mean that you were pampering. My poorly made point was that the karma system is so random around here I don't even pay attention to it (unless the color of my name changes then it's like "Huh, ok people are bored" - goes for up or down).

You're right that it shouldn't be, but it is.

#18 May 22 2007 at 9:17 AM Rating: Decent
His emo-ticon may be getting the rate downs not his post hehe.

Pretty much no reason at all to have VW out in that instance with a Pally tank.
I'm going to guess that he was using his VW because he's either a)insane or b)nub.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 155 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (155)