And my point is that you are wrong in assuming that combat works a hellalova lot better. Easier yes, better no. I think I covered that like 4 posts ago. Hemo buff + my dam = as much dam(or really close) as I do combat specced(combat swords anyway)and still more dam than an enhancement shaman(if you had a choice between a rogue and shaman that would be a tough call as shaman is a lot more versatile, but from a dam comparison it's not close, rogue>shaman, at least for this sub rogue).
And no 25man raid will have 2 rogues and a tank? The others are just examples of classes that also benefit from the debuff. I didn't say they would all be in the same raid. And I use SnD as my primary finisher, mentioned that like 3 posts ago. I have to keep explaining things I typed clearly, makes me wonder why I bother responding at all.
I'm so sorry my SSs were misleading to your opinion that you can't be good rogue and be sub speccd. I'm so sorry that my SS shows you what a well geared sub rogue can do in a raid. I'm so sorry the game has changed with TBC and you haven't been able to realize it.
But you clearly have your opinion and you are clearly always gonna be right.
So I'll leave it at that.
To yoshiiii, both of those specs were grinding specs, ShS is great for grinding, mostly because you don't have to worry about positioning or walking around stealthed, just stealth and pop next to the mob and use whatever opener you like.
The other reason I love sub spec is because I can grind with it, 5man with and raid with it without any real problems(it's versatile). But as I also said like 6 posts ago, I too will be going combat when the next patch comes out, mostly because combat swords is a lot easier and because of the glancing blows reduction will make it more neccessary to have dw spec when raiding.
Edited, May 18th 2007 6:34pm by mahlerite