I am an arms specced lvl70 warrior, I am geared up for DPS / PvP and I am normally only out-dps'ed in AV by huntards and warlocks.
I do quite a few instances with my guild, sometimes tanking but mostly as DPS. I might not be up there with a mage but I feel I contribute to the party as a DPS warrior. So I was suprised when someone in my guild, who I have never partied with, said he'd never go to an instance with two warriors - he voiced that opinion in strong terms. Considering he was a warrior I found that a bit annoying. We started discussing this in guild chat but it soon turned into a "Yes I am", "No you aren't" tennis match about whether a DPS warrior is a useful member of the team.
Does he has a point? I know the lack of any real crowd control could be an argument for not including a warrior, but with other classes who can, plus a warriors damage mitigation, I feel that would not be such an issue.
Even if he is right considering he was a guildie trying to position himself as main tank I feel ruling out including me in any instance was not the attitude I would expect from a "team mate". I was curious what line he would take if I was the only available member for the last slot on a guild run, he seemed to suggest he would look outside the guild.
I found his attitude frustrating. If his thinking is right I should re-roll as a rogue, as they seemed acceptable to this guy, but I want to be an in-your-face melee class. Maybe there is a niche for some new DPS-only melee class which would suit my prefered playstyle, but I am not sure what that would be..
Now I have got that off my chest....