Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

HUNTER VS. WARLOCKFollow

#27 Apr 24 2007 at 7:21 PM Rating: Default
Wow, that's one amazing bump. Like digging up your great-grandma's grave and having a cup of tea.
But since I'm bored, I read through the thread, and I have one thing to say;

Quote:
imo, warlocks and hunters are both very underestimated.

HA HA HA HA HA oh god, that's funny.... oh wait, you're serious?
Well, then again, about a year and a half of nerfs being thrown around does kind of muddle your memory, but I'm still pretty sure that about half of those nerfs went towards locks and hunters. But I'm still pretty sure that anybody who underestimates a hunter (or, even worse, a lock) in PvP (PvE not so much, but still so) has probably never seen a good player with a lock. Or a Hunter, but pretty much at any level after 46 or so lock>hunter in PvP in most cases I've seen.
And, since I'm still bored, I'll answer the question!
1) They're about even. They both have pets to keep the aggro off while you hit them from far away.
2) Hunters can fill up any holes you might have for a 5-man, but they're less popular as you get higher in level because they have less focus than other classes. Kind of like a druid, but not as severe.
3) Warlock stratagem: DoT, DoT, DoT, Fear, send in the pet to finish, get a shadowblast or some other nuke ready when (if) they start to make their way back.
Hunter stratagem: It's so different depending on your pet, but I think my favorite is to use a scorpid. If you have the jump on them, you can crippling poision them and take a few aimed/arcane shots at them, put on a sting, and then start to back pedal away while your pet beats on them. The fact of the matter is, they're both rather good classes for PvP, but it all matters on how good you are at the game.
4) Warlocks don't have to pay for a level 40 mount, and Hunters have to buy ammo, but don't use as much (AS MUCH, note) water as Warlocks.

#28 May 05 2007 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
So I've been reading on this discussion about Warlock Vs. Hunters. I have a 48 Warlock that I strictly PvP with. Expect of course to lvl high enough in the next bracket. Anyways, my girlfriend has a 48 Hunter. We both join BG's and we both are at the top for DMG and Kills. Overall she gets more killing blows then I do and a little bit more DMG. However! In a duel I beat her hands down everytime. So this does not mean Locks are better. I believe they are about the same in strenght for PvP. As far as money goes Locks are better for money. True we need to buy water. But hey a mage can make me 100X water for free. Those arrows can't be made without having to spend some money. Secondly when we both are trying to look for a group. I get picked first no matter what. Locks add a bit more to groups depending on what type of instance they are running. Locks can Soul Stone, Banish elementals or demonds, We can use CC with Suc, Also have an OFF tank with Void, Can have Stam bonus with Imp. Fear always helps (but should not be used in an instance hardly ever) in last minute resort cases. Also a Lock can Sac a void to have a Bubble sheild for 30 seconds. Hunters do have a lot of DPS and traps which help out very well. I personnally think Hunters are a very easy class. My girlfriend is a Nub and got a hunter to 40+ very quickly. Not because she knows where to go but because hunters have it pertty easy. I like both classes I have never personnally had a hunter higher then 10 for a pet to use. I might just make one now. PvP Hunters will have more dps and kills, money, locks got it down, instances locks got it down also. A lot of this is based on my personal opinion if you don't agree then fine. Don't be a jerk and post how "dumb" I am. Also keep in mind that Hunters are litteraly everywhere!!! You can't go into a Zone and not find a hunter. It's just not heard of. So for those of you who want a fun DPS pet using toon, pick a Warlock. You won't be sorry.
#29 May 05 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
Obviously this debate can go on forever. OP, just play the class you find more fun. What could possibly be more important?
#30 May 05 2007 at 12:28 PM Rating: Decent
******
27,272 posts
Theophany the Sly wrote:
Holy necrobump Batman!
#31 May 05 2007 at 12:53 PM Rating: Decent
How can you say hunters don't add to the survivability of a party?? i can't count how many times I've been thanked by healers for pulling adds of them and putting them under reliable CC.
#32 May 05 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Decent
**
830 posts
S'okay... someone also said that a pet can't pull aggro off the main tank... LOL! I have to turn growl off or my pet does that pretty much 100% of the time!

It's rare when I want to DO that but it's sometimes exactly what's needed, especially when the healer goes OOM, at least then I can let the pet take the aggro and I play healer for the pet while the healer regens some mana. This has saved a wipe or two.
#33 May 05 2007 at 3:38 PM Rating: Decent
******
27,272 posts
stop necroing this thread, it has passed away a long time ago.
please let it rest in peace as it was meant to.
thank you for your attention.
#34 May 07 2007 at 7:10 PM Rating: Default
49 posts
Mazra you seem to be making comments on Hunters with little to no explanation or reasoning behind it. Hunters are one of the best DPS classes. Hunters simply get a bad name because of all the idiots that play them. It's not fair to say "hunters have no CC" just because the n00b in your group doesnt know how to use Freeze Trap. Warlocks and Hunters are two very different classes that should be treated that way. They only get compared so often because they are both DPS classes and they both have pets. My best advice, try both out, pick whichever one you like more.
#35 May 07 2007 at 7:22 PM Rating: Good
***
1,002 posts
ooh a combo necropost and wall'o'text rolled into one!
#36 May 07 2007 at 8:50 PM Rating: Default
1.Hunters (more damage)
2.Hunters (nobody really cares for warlocks)
3.Hunters (whos always at #1?? either a warrior, rougue or Hunter)
4.Hunters (have you seenn how much cloth gear goes for??)

4-0 Hunter wins hands down
#37 May 07 2007 at 8:52 PM Rating: Default
sorry to double post but in a duel??

a warlock would win . . . theyd fear the whole time and do dots . . . then fear ext ext
#38 May 08 2007 at 6:11 AM Rating: Default
***
1,256 posts
Well I prefer Hunters. I have a lvl 19 Warlock on Emerald dream and being a DOT bot isnt my thing. Running around DOTting everything and then watching the fight is kinda pointless IMO. But hey someone else said it true. Apples and Oranges. Yeah they are DPS classes... But one is ranged... the other is magic.
#39 May 08 2007 at 6:12 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,256 posts
BillyBobJoeThorton wrote:
in a duel??

a warlock would win . . . theyd fear the whole time and do dots . . . then fear ext ext

Warlocks dont beat a BM Hunter. Beastial wraith with Beast within anyone? that skill rocks.

Edited, May 8th 2007 10:14am by HitashLevat
#40 May 08 2007 at 9:28 AM Rating: Decent
Well I don't take stock in dueling because in my experiences who wins depends on who has the better gear, and by plain luck (i.e. Does my Silence Shot hit them before they get their Fear off, or vice versa, etc..).

Instance wise, I'll be honest 90% of the time as a Hunter I'm there for crowd control because my Pet, Frost Trap, Feign Death, Distracting Shot, Concussive shot, among other things provides hunters with some awesome methods to grab aggro, lose aggro, stun, and snare targets.


Pre-55ish when you can start doing BRD I don't believe it matters at all though. Because I've done Gnomer with 4 Hunters and a Pally...done ZF with 2 Locks and 2 Hunters and a Shammy. So I would decide based on which you'll ike better. Because really before 55 it's more about not having tools in your party.
#41 May 08 2007 at 11:00 AM Rating: Decent
id say there are differnt sides:

Hunter;
Good:
-Less mana needed
-more focus on attributes for better game play (talents)

Bad:
-Lose space for food, ammo
-Need stamina (lots)
-mainly focused on pet (bad for survivalists/marksmen)

Warlock;
Good:
-Can change hp into mp
-Can summon demon over and over
-can summon teammates from all over the world
-superb DoTs

Bad:
-Loses a lot of mana
-vulnerable to stings
-need to kill teammates to summon some minions

its your choice
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 165 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (165)