Two swords or not two swords, that is the question.
Whether it is nobler in the fight to carry
Two pointy, stabby, slashy things
To take as arms against a sea of squishies
And by opposing, end them bloodily
Or not, which would be much less awesome.
So Two Swords or Not Two Swords? You can also argue for two swordchucks and two gunswords.
Edited, Nov 22nd 2010 5:14pm by KingWinterclaw
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- General Video Game Discussion
- Warrior Question
Warrior QuestionFollow
Scholar
34 posts
I'd rather be a master of one sword than just "pretty good" with two.
-1 in Shakespeare parody recognition for you.
And only one sword means you've got fewer offensive skills.
And only one sword means you've got fewer offensive skills.
Scholar
24 posts
I'll take a Gunsword and an emo attitude.
Ohwait, that was FF7.
Ohwait, that was FF7.
2 posts
Unless you're using a greatsword, in which case all five are yours ;D
Scholar
36 posts
Dual axe all the way bro... Unless I feel like switching a sword.
..
...
....
What? I like being about to spin around like a cyclone... It looks like fun... :(
..
...
....
What? I like being about to spin around like a cyclone... It looks like fun... :(
11 posts
I'm usually quite fond of the main-hand sword, off-hand dagger combination, but in most games using two swords instead is simply better both in terms of damage and speed. With Guild Wars 2, though, based on the ranger videos, I'm hoping to see the sword-dagger combo actually being useful.
Also, that Hamlet remix... Awesome.
Also, that Hamlet remix... Awesome.
Recent Visitors: 23
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (23)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- General Video Game Discussion
- Warrior Question
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC