I haven't been the most dedicated fan of the Halo franchise. The original was a fantastic medium for my college buddies and I to get drunk on a slow weekend, but I really couldn't care less about the story, characters, plot, or the player base of the online multiplayer.
However, a few of my friends just got Halo: Reach, which has replaced Modern Warfare 2 as their preferred online FPS. Therefore, I purchased it as well, and spent most of this past weekend merrily fragging away.
Who's got it? Whaddaya think?
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- General Video Game Discussion
- Halo: Reach
Halo: ReachFollow
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
Demea wrote:
I haven't been the most dedicated fan of the Halo franchise. The original was a fantastic medium for my college buddies and I to get drunk on a slow weekend, but I really couldn't care less about the story, characters, plot, or the player base of the online multiplayer.
However, a few of my friends just got Halo: Reach, which has replaced Modern Warfare 2 as their preferred online FPS. Therefore, I purchased it as well, and spent most of this past weekend merrily fragging away.
Who's got it? Whaddaya think?
However, a few of my friends just got Halo: Reach, which has replaced Modern Warfare 2 as their preferred online FPS. Therefore, I purchased it as well, and spent most of this past weekend merrily fragging away.
Who's got it? Whaddaya think?
I can't Reach out any information regarding the game, but you and your friends are aware that Black Ops is in stores now, right?
I just had to find a way to make the pun, I'm going to burn in hell...
See, here's the thing with Black Ops; it looks like it's MW2, with some new character models and a few new toys. And, seeing as I already own MW2, I'd feel kind of silly about paying $60 for what's basically just a re-skin.
Halo, on the other hand, I haven't owned since the original for X-Box.
Halo, on the other hand, I haven't owned since the original for X-Box.
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
I've had that idea about every Call of Duty so far, but yeah, noted. I'm hearing good thing about Battlefield: Bad Company 1/2 if you remotely care. I still can't help you on Halo, though. I haven't read much about that and I can't particularly say I care about the franchise.
That's an accurate criticism of CoD, but it's equally accurate for Halo, so I'm not sure why you'd bother making it Demea.
Allegory wrote:
That's an accurate criticism of CoD, but it's equally accurate for Halo, so I'm not sure why you'd bother making it Demea.
Because he owns MW2, but not a Halo since the very first.
It makes sense in a practical way, but not in a philosophical way.
And to add to this thread: At least Halo has story, and doesn't feel like a complete repackage. I lost all respect for CoD when they just shove **** off of the line to make more money, for example World at War. That was awful. Reach at least brought things with it, the new load out system, etc.
I like Reach a lot, and play it with my brother on occasion.
BlackyLakshmi wrote:
I can't Reach out any information regarding the game, but you and your friends are aware that Black Ops is in stores now, right?
I just had to find a way to make the pun, I'm going to burn in hell...
I just had to find a way to make the pun, I'm going to burn in hell...
It seems that pun was... *puts on sunglasses* out of your Reach.
Recent Visitors: 143
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (143)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- General Video Game Discussion
- Halo: Reach
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC