Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Enix.Follow

#27 Oct 04 2010 at 8:36 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
BlackyLakshmi wrote:
Quote:
I also have Valkyria Chronicles on the PS3, but haven't gotten around to playing it yet.
This game is from pure awesome gifted to the world by the gods themselves through Sega.
FTF My Opinion.
#28 Oct 04 2010 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
**
510 posts
That's reassuring. I can't give a full answer at the moment as I am at work and using my phone. But I am glad to read varying opinions put clearly. It's nice to see. I'll carry on when I get home.
#29 Oct 04 2010 at 10:37 AM Rating: Good
Sketchy Character
*****
10,109 posts
I lol'ed at this thread.

Enix's back library of games is just as impressive as Square's. (Legend of Gaia, Star Ocean the Second Story) Since the two of them fused however, you're getting incredibly beautiful games, yes, but the gameplay that made their SNES and PS1 titles so great isn't there anymore.

That being said, Allegory's opinion is closest to my own, and I don't feel the need to type it out again, but will say that I am playing it, and enjoying the individuals I'm playing with more than the game that I'm playing.
____________________________
Toohotforu wrote:
Just punch her in the vag and tell her to @#$% off.

#30 Oct 04 2010 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Quote:
I don't think Square has changed significantly since joining with Enix. The quality of the games has been a fairly constant average. More so, I applaud themfor continuing to be innovative in their single player RPGs. It doesn't always work, but no one can disagree that SE tried something very different with FFXII's game play. I'd rather that than have a company like Bioware that remakes the same game over and over, regardless of how good or bad you may think it is.


What Al said. As I've grown I've found myself wondering whether or not FFVII was really as good as I remember. Thinking on it now, and seeing the reactions of younger gamers and the FF games they play, I'm leaning toward "Nope." It was great because it was a decent game, and I had never seen anything like it at the time.

That said, I enjoyed FFVI and FFVII a lot more than the later games. FFIX was fun, though. But I've played them all :-P
#31 Oct 04 2010 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Unohana wrote:
Yeah, but my point is before Enix they were all good. Every one of them.
They really weren't. Three, maybe four out of 10 of their Squaresoft releases were good. Maybe push the number up to six for enjoyably mediocre. That's just their Final Fantasy franchise. Square released a lot of lemons beyond those horizons.

And I'm being nice on those numbers. I'm not even adding in Mystic Quest or the three Legend games for the Gameboy.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#32 Oct 04 2010 at 12:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Unohana wrote:
I've got just enough money (overdraft) to buy something when it's released. But not enough to shrug it off as if it was an insignificant amount. I also like to buy things on release date. I tend to get double reward points for preordering, which comes in handy considering the amount of games I buy. PS3, 360, Wii, PC, PSP and am working on my backlog of PS2 games too right now. That's just how I roll.


Sounds like maybe you need to break that expensive "I'll buy a FF game because it's an FF game" habit, then.

No offense intended, of course, but if you're overdrafting your bank account to play a new video game and you already don't like the other games the company has released, that's a problem.

Having said that, I don't have a dog in this fight. I stopped playing FFXI because it got to be a burden, and I don't intend to play FFXIV. However, I'll say again, Dragon Quest 9 kicks an inordinate amount of ***.
#33 Oct 04 2010 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
I am tempted to try FFXIV even though everything I read makes me think I won't like it. It's an abusive lover syndrome. FFXI only hurt me because it loved me.

FFXIV will be different now, it's changed.

Oops I ran into a door and fell down some stairs...
#34 Oct 04 2010 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
I think that all MMO's should give the customer the option of offline play. If you bought the game, and you love it, but you don't want to pay $15-20 a month, you should be able to stop your subscription but still play that game offline.

I love WoW. I had a lot of fun playing it. But, really, I mostly just solo'ed everything. I can't justify continuing to play $15.95 for an MMO that I'll only really be playing as a single player game.

Yeah, this doesn't have anything to do with FFXIV, but I didn't feel it really justified it's own thread, either.
#35 Oct 04 2010 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
**
510 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Unohana wrote:
Yeah, but my point is before Enix they were all good. Every one of them.
They really weren't. Three, maybe four out of 10 of their Squaresoft releases were good. Maybe push the number up to six for enjoyably mediocre. That's just their Final Fantasy franchise. Square released a lot of lemons beyond those horizons.

And I'm being nice on those numbers. I'm not even adding in Mystic Quest or the three Legend games for the Gameboy.


I wasn't clear. I was referring strictly to Final Fantasy games when I said that. My ****-up. Games such as Brave Fencer Mushashi were trash.

Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Sounds like maybe you need to break that expensive "I'll buy a FF game because it's an FF game" habit, then.

No offense intended, of course, but if you're overdrafting your bank account to play a new video game and you already don't like the other games the company has released, that's a problem.


No offence taken. You're quite right. Me buying video games is a habit. And an expensive one. I went to Tesco the other night (night being about 11pm) to buy FIFA11 with the overdraft again just because it was out. However, when I walked out of there I had FIFA11 and Dead Rising 2 just because it was in a 2 for £60 deal. Stupid. Roll on payday.

Shojindo wrote:
I am tempted to try FFXIV even though everything I read makes me think I won't like it.


Don't. And I'm not just saying that because *I* don't like it. I would wait a while, see what they fix and then give it a whirl. Even then you might still dislike it for whatever reason, but right now with all the UI flaws, difficulty targeting monsters and the highly over-complicated crafting system it's like a crash-helmet-wearing ****** at a Mensa gathering.
#36 Oct 04 2010 at 5:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I think that all MMO's should give the customer the option of offline play. If you bought the game, and you love it, but you don't want to pay $15-20 a month, you should be able to stop your subscription but still play that game offline.

I love WoW. I had a lot of fun playing it. But, really, I mostly just solo'ed everything. I can't justify continuing to play $15.95 for an MMO that I'll only really be playing as a single player game.

Yeah, this doesn't have anything to do with FFXIV, but I didn't feel it really justified it's own thread, either.


So, you'll be playing the hell out of D3? :P
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#37 Oct 04 2010 at 11:33 PM Rating: Good
FFXIV is much better post Beta than it was Pre Beta.

That being said, I don't think the gameplay is quite as "fun" as FFXIs, but at the same time things don't take quite as long either. my biggest gripe about FFXI was you needed 6-36+ people to do the really fun stuff & everything took forever. FFXIV seems a lot more solo friendly & traveling around (once you've walked to the nodes) is also much easier.

Now if only FFXIV had an auto-targetting feature, I'd be golden. Getting raped by moles because of targetting lag/difficulties =/= fun.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#38 Oct 05 2010 at 8:03 AM Rating: Decent
Vataro wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I think that all MMO's should give the customer the option of offline play. If you bought the game, and you love it, but you don't want to pay $15-20 a month, you should be able to stop your subscription but still play that game offline.

I love WoW. I had a lot of fun playing it. But, really, I mostly just solo'ed everything. I can't justify continuing to play $15.95 for an MMO that I'll only really be playing as a single player game.

Yeah, this doesn't have anything to do with FFXIV, but I didn't feel it really justified it's own thread, either.


So, you'll be playing the hell out of D3? :P


Hell yeah. I can't wait for that game to come out. I've always said Blizzard did it right with Diablo.

Omegavegeta wrote:
FFXIV is much better post Beta than it was Pre Beta.


How did you play FFXIV in pre-beta? Smiley: dubious
#39 Oct 05 2010 at 3:29 PM Rating: Good
****
7,861 posts
Belkira wrote:
I love WoW. I had a lot of fun playing it. But, really, I mostly just solo'ed everything. I can't justify continuing to play $15.95 for an MMO that I'll only really be playing as a single player game.

Maybe they do things different in Tennessee, but my WoW subscription is only $14.99/month.

Yea, I know less than a dollar less, but the devil is in the details.
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#40 Oct 05 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Good
Kastigir wrote:
Belkira wrote:
I love WoW. I had a lot of fun playing it. But, really, I mostly just solo'ed everything. I can't justify continuing to play $15.95 for an MMO that I'll only really be playing as a single player game.

Maybe they do things different in Tennessee, but my WoW subscription is only $14.99/month.

Yea, I know less than a dollar less, but the devil is in the details.


Smiley: lol I couldn't remember so I just threw up a number that sounded good.
#41 Oct 07 2010 at 9:32 AM Rating: Decent
Kinda skimmed the thread, but I'd also say that Square killed my Enix. I haven't played DQIX, so I can't comment on that, but Enix used to put out some wonderfully quirky/experimental games that I loved. Robotrek, SoulBlazer, Illusion of Gaia, 7th Saga, etc. They just don't seem to be willing to make games like that anymore.

Edit: Did some nostalgia-fueled research, and every game I mentioned save 7th Saga was apparently actually developed by Quintet with Enix simply the publisher.

Edited, Oct 7th 2010 1:51pm by Straadin
#42 Oct 07 2010 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good


1 was wonderful.

2 I've started around 30 times and never got in to it, I guess it's not great. new systems, didn't work, and they were smart enough to abandon them.

3 was really good. Innovative new systems, but they were all good new systems.

4 was really really good. Dropped the newer system from 3, mechanics were just ok, standard for the time, story was great.

5 was very good. Again they went back to more tried and true systems from 3. Game mechanics were great, story was good enough.

6 they again dropped the mechanics. Mechanics were just ok, I didn't like how every character could learn any spell, made them a little too general. Story was probably the best they've ever come up with ever.

7 story was not bad, mechanics were terrible. I couldn't identify with the major characters very well, I liked some of the side characters much better. Cid highwind was my favorite. I liked Yuffie and Cait Sith.

8 story was not bad, I actually really liked the characters in this game. Mechanics were terrible. Somehow I like this game though better than 7 just because the characters were much better.

9 they revised the mechanics and used a much more standard design. Characters could use omgz armors again! Again I couldn't identify with any of the characters and the story felt pretty generic. I felt it was a low point in the series at the time, but the mechanics carried this game for me, still was kinda fun. Vivi was a good chacter as a supporting character, but he couldn't carry that cast.

10 was not bad. Sphere grid was a terrible idea. Characters weren't 'terrible', I didn't identify with Tidus very much, but I loved Auron. Rikku was endearing. Story was decent enough, but not wonderful.

X-2 is dead to me.

11 I loved :( I played it for 3 years, but it just started feeling too boring, grinding grinding grinding. Killing same endgame stuff. The job system worked well, the story was great, the characters were great, even the NPCs! :P I've actually considered going back now that so much has changed.

12 I liked it personally. license system was terrible. game mechanics other than that weren't too bad. I really liked the hunting system, added a lot of fun things to do on the side. Setting up the gambits was quirky but I didn't think it was too bad, it was a neat way to make the battles real time but still have the characters do basically what you wanted them to do. Story wasn't bad, and I liked all 4 characters. Not sure why these two kids kept tagging along though, never let them in my party with the main characters.

13 first FF game I didn't play. I read lots of previews and it just sounded like something I wouldn't be in to. Also I don't have a PS3, so I held off, but I didn't get it for 360 either after I heard reviews. Just sounded so linear and not much fun. Maybe I'll try it someday at discount.

14. Terrible. What the hell were they thinking. Get some freaking people who play videogames to give advice. They have this habit of trying these new rinky-dink systems with no mind to whether it's actually good or not, sphere grid, license system, well 14 was like they took 30 of these rinky dink ideas and stuck them in one game. Who cares if the left hand it making a super complex crafting system that will require a thriving economy where people can quickly buy and sell things, right hand is going to make no auction house and have a system where you have to spend hours browsing through bazaars instead! hur dur dur
#43 Oct 08 2010 at 1:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
510 posts
digitalcraft, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Quite a bit.


So, err... Do you agree or disagree?
#44 Oct 09 2010 at 5:13 AM Rating: Excellent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
FFXIV is much better post Beta than it was Pre Beta.


How did you play FFXIV in pre-beta? Smiley: dubious

Alpha.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#45 Oct 09 2010 at 10:22 AM Rating: Decent
Deadgye wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
FFXIV is much better post Beta than it was Pre Beta.


How did you play FFXIV in pre-beta? Smiley: dubious

Alpha.


I'm surprised that was allowed outside of the development team.

Edited, Oct 9th 2010 11:22am by Belkira
#46 Oct 10 2010 at 5:42 PM Rating: Good
Doctor Straadin wrote:
Kinda skimmed the thread, but I'd also say that Square killed my Enix. I haven't played DQIX, so I can't comment on that, but Enix used to put out some wonderfully quirky/experimental games that I loved. Robotrek, SoulBlazer, Illusion of Gaia, 7th Saga, etc. They just don't seem to be willing to make games like that anymore.

Edit: Did some nostalgia-fueled research, and every game I mentioned save 7th Saga was apparently actually developed by Quintet with Enix simply the publisher.

Edited, Oct 7th 2010 1:51pm by Straadin


They are not allowed any intellectual freedom like they use to have.

I miss Enix as a standalone company too.

A lot of the games Enix would publishe would never make it past Square's approval now, IMO.

I am feeling the same for the now defunct RARE.


Edited, Oct 10th 2010 6:42pm by PentUpAnger
#47 Oct 10 2010 at 10:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Deadgye wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
FFXIV is much better post Beta than it was Pre Beta.


How did you play FFXIV in pre-beta? Smiley: dubious

Alpha.


I'm surprised that was allowed outside of the development team.

Edited, Oct 9th 2010 11:22am by Belkira

Actually, most of what happened while the NDA was up was still listed as alpha. I still remember having to create your character with a slow loading character creator that would crash on occasion and all the options were just numbers without descriptors...
#48 Oct 10 2010 at 10:42 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
CrimsonNeko wrote:
all the options were just numbers without descriptors...

I hate when they dumb down Japanese games for westerners. If I wanted a game where I knew what stuff did, I wouldn't be playing an online Final Fantasy game.
#49 Oct 11 2010 at 12:52 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
No, I agree that in game options are fine with minimal description. I'm referring to Hair color options in character creation, for example, and everytime you clicked one it would take forever to load it, so you couldn't see what "Hair Color # 16" was without waiting for it to load. Gotta love alphas...
#50 Oct 11 2010 at 1:04 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
But where's the challenge? If just anybody can get through character creation without even trying, then why even bother playing. And don't get me started on the in game text. They translated it from Japanese for you? Are we four year olds?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 203 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (203)