Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

OMFG Pandaren? I'm quitting! And here's why...Follow

#27 Oct 24 2011 at 2:44 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
The DLC comic of course. I'm pretty sure it's been linked in the BDT before.
#28 Oct 24 2011 at 3:00 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
PentUpAnger wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
...

Those conflicts are interesting, and I'm willing to take a stand. That's not the case with WoW--I have no interest in killing Orcs just because my leader's a racist (or because theirs is and they are following his orders).

If they were to break the factions down into political organizations, rather than racial ones, I'd be far more interested in the conflict. But you'd need to be able to have some racial freedom to do that (which could either involve "choosing" or it could involve them creating new racial groups within each faction--like if they made a group of Blood Elf separatists loyal to the ALliance).


Wars are not always fought for good reasons.

I wouldn't try to think too far into the future of why you think the Alliance and Horde are going to war... considering no one knows a concrete reason of what causes the drums of war to happen inbetween 4.3 and MoP.

I believe Chilton said something about the Horde laying waste to Theramore right before MoP, but I don't remember seeing the why.

There has been a lot of talk that the war is over land and resources, and everyone knows that actual wars have been fought over just that in the past. From what I remember from History class (and the History channel)... sometimes it doesn't matter who you are... but what you have that causes wars.


Meh, still boils down to race warfare, which just doesn't do it for me. I feel like the ignorant villain regardless of which side I play on. As long as the two factions are constructed of racial groups that hate each other in virtue of their race, I'm never going to be excited about the conflict. And I fully agree that wars are often not fought for good reasons. But if I'm going to play and enjoy a game in which I'm forced to be involved in said war in a direct, factional sense, then I need to feel justified.

Most games that include wars like WoW's (meaning ones with awful justifications) have you playing a character outside of the scope of the war--either trying to survive it or stop it. Sometimes you are forced to choose a side for the greater good. But being forced to play through one side or the other, from the start, never able to defect from, betray or disobey your leaders? It was fine with the interfactional conflict was the subplot in Vanilla/BC, acceptable when they put it forth in Wrath, since you still had some logical leaders. But Cata was too much absurdity for me to enjoy being Horde or Alliance. NO central villain? That's just not gonna work for me.

Hell, if they just introduce a quest line that let's you "defect" and switch factions, regardless of race, I'd be so much more willing to endorse one of the sides. Of course, I wouldn't be really happy until they introduced a third faction (and hopefully it would be significantly different). Most games do this by making one a theocracy, one a republic, and one an empire. At least then you get to fight for a doctrine you can actually endorse.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#29 Oct 24 2011 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
The DLC comic of course. I'm pretty sure it's been linked in the BDT before.


Prove it. Smiley: sly
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#30 Oct 24 2011 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Hell no.
#31 Oct 24 2011 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
**
432 posts
Mazra wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
OMGIWANTOLDTREEFORMBACK!


http://www.darklegacycomics.com/83.html


Or maybe you were thinking of Redneck Trees?


#32 Oct 24 2011 at 3:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
As long as the two factions are constructed of racial groups that hate each other in virtue of their race, I'm never going to be excited about the conflict.


Honestly, I don't think that ever is going to change. As much as my liberal self doesn't want to admit it, part of humanity is fearing/hating what you don't understand. To take this out of WoW would take away some of the realism and connectability for most players I think.

Also, think of it this way: Most of the racial conflicts exist, not because someone just decided to hate that particular race, but because of what one race did to another. If the orcs had come to Azeroth without trying to start a war and kill all the humans, do you think that the orcs and humans would have the issues that they do? Absolutely not. There'd still be some ******** out there who would hate them just for looking different, but not the majority of people. I really don't understand Garrosh's motivation for hating the Alliance, but Varian's hatred of orcs makes a lot of sense. His father was killed by orcs, and his homeland utterly destroyed when he was a kid. That's going to leave a mark on you, and it'd be quite difficult to overcome it. Add to that, all the **** he went through as Lo'gosh, and you've got a guy with a quite understandable reason for hating orcs, and someone with severe emotional disconnect. That is going to cause issues.
#33 Oct 24 2011 at 4:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
SpookyTheCat wrote:
Or maybe you were thinking of Redneck Trees?


That site is confusing. It keeps talking about something called 'dice'.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#34 Oct 24 2011 at 4:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Mazra wrote:
SpookyTheCat wrote:
Or maybe you were thinking of Redneck Trees?


That site is confusing. It keeps talking about something called 'dice'.


It's an ancient device for randomly generating numbers. All our games do it for us now.

I hear they still have some in a museum somewhere.
#35 Oct 24 2011 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Wonder Gem PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Quote:
As long as the two factions are constructed of racial groups that hate each other in virtue of their race, I'm never going to be excited about the conflict.


Honestly, I don't think that ever is going to change. As much as my liberal self doesn't want to admit it, part of humanity is fearing/hating what you don't understand. To take this out of WoW would take away some of the realism and connectability for most players I think.

Also, think of it this way: Most of the racial conflicts exist, not because someone just decided to hate that particular race, but because of what one race did to another. If the orcs had come to Azeroth without trying to start a war and kill all the humans, do you think that the orcs and humans would have the issues that they do? Absolutely not. There'd still be some @#%^s out there who would hate them just for looking different, but not the majority of people. I really don't understand Garrosh's motivation for hating the Alliance, but Varian's hatred of orcs makes a lot of sense. His father was killed by orcs, and his homeland utterly destroyed when he was a kid. That's going to leave a mark on you, and it'd be quite difficult to overcome it. Add to that, all the sh*t he went through as Lo'gosh, and you've got a guy with a quite understandable reason for hating orcs, and someone with severe emotional disconnect. That is going to cause issues.


All you've done is provide a narrative regarding how the racism formed. It doesn't justify it at all (and I doubt racism can be justified in any context where both groups are both good and evil).

And if the entire conflict is going to boil down to side A being pissed about that thing side B did all those years ago, I'm just not interested in supporting either.

This shows why the conflict escalated, yeah. It's no great surprise that mutual racism and war fueled a huge increase in racism on both sides.

Edited, Oct 24th 2011 7:14pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#36 Oct 24 2011 at 7:13 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,764 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Wonder Gem PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Quote:
As long as the two factions are constructed of racial groups that hate each other in virtue of their race, I'm never going to be excited about the conflict.


Honestly, I don't think that ever is going to change. As much as my liberal self doesn't want to admit it, part of humanity is fearing/hating what you don't understand. To take this out of WoW would take away some of the realism and connectability for most players I think.

Also, think of it this way: Most of the racial conflicts exist, not because someone just decided to hate that particular race, but because of what one race did to another. If the orcs had come to Azeroth without trying to start a war and kill all the humans, do you think that the orcs and humans would have the issues that they do? Absolutely not. There'd still be some @#%^s out there who would hate them just for looking different, but not the majority of people. I really don't understand Garrosh's motivation for hating the Alliance, but Varian's hatred of orcs makes a lot of sense. His father was killed by orcs, and his homeland utterly destroyed when he was a kid. That's going to leave a mark on you, and it'd be quite difficult to overcome it. Add to that, all the sh*t he went through as Lo'gosh, and you've got a guy with a quite understandable reason for hating orcs, and someone with severe emotional disconnect. That is going to cause issues.


All you've done is provide a narrative regarding how the racism formed. It doesn't justify it at all (and I doubt racism can be justified in any context where both groups are both good and evil).

And if the entire conflict is going to boil down to side A being pissed about that thing side B did all those years ago, I'm just not interested in supporting either.

This shows why the conflict escalated, yeah. It's no great surprise that mutual racism and war fueled a huge increase in racism on both sides.

Edited, Oct 24th 2011 7:14pm by idiggory

If you take race completely out of the picture, the two factions would still be fighting. Garrosh isn't fighting the Night Elves because they're Night Elves, he just wants Ashenvale and views the Night Elves as ripe for the conquering. Varian doesn't hate the orcs because they have green skin, he hates them for what they did to his kingdom, his family, and to him.

Trying to say the whole conflict is about "race" seems incredibly infantile.
#37 Oct 24 2011 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I... really don't understand. Varian hates "them" because of what "they" did to his homeland...

And this refers to all orcs...

Yeeeeeeah, that's racism. It's no different than how my Great Uncle had issues with the Japanese after WWII. It was still racism, even though he felt justified in it. It's not like he [Garrosh] hated a political entity, because the New Horde wasn't the same construct as the old Horde (which still existed, and was an enemy of the new Horde). And Thrall, who he hated so badly, had never even been a member of the old Horde, but had rather spent his life trying to foster peace.

Just because he feels justified, doesn't mean it's not racism.

And Garrosh is TOTALLY doing this for race reasons. He thinks that the NEs are inferior to Orcs and, therefore, don't have any right to the land. The only race besides Orcs he respects are the Tauren.

You can't even justify Garrosh's actions in terms of him wanting revenge. The Alliance have never done anything to cause him pain (on the contrary, it's because of Jaina that his own father was saved from his demonic taint). He thinks that the Alliance races are inferior and, as such, they deserve to die. And he actually ordered Sylvanas to purge every human (which includes civilians and children) from Gilneas, despite the fact that they had NEVER been involved with the conflict on either side and posed no threat at all to him.

That's not conquering, it's genocide. I haven't seen anything to support the theory that Garrosh would accept a surrender.

Edited, Oct 24th 2011 9:28pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#38 Oct 24 2011 at 8:14 PM Rating: Excellent
**
399 posts
I'm waiting for the down under landmass with the Koala Death Knights and Wallaby Warlocks.
#39 Oct 24 2011 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
**
807 posts
Lyrailis wrote:
[quote]

The only problem is, the choosing is kind of forced upon you. You MUST choose one or the other.

Edited, Oct 24th 2011 8:25am by Lyrailis





"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."


Because I felt like dropping a Rush quote.
#40 Oct 24 2011 at 10:15 PM Rating: Excellent
idiggory wrote:
But if I'm going to play and enjoy a game in which I'm forced to be involved in said war in a direct, factional sense, then I need to feel justified.

This is something I differ on, for a few reasons. To start with, there's the whole question of what does or what can justify war? I'll try to avoid any deep, nihilist philosophical explorations into if "right", "wrong" or "justification" actually exist or not really but, if we're talking justification, it could be argued that the only way to justify warfare or killing is self-defence, or the defence of the innocent from those who choose to inflict harm, etc. Which is all an interesting discussion but, for me, not something I feel is necessary for me to agree with to enjoy WoW.

I'll go with the idea of someone not finding this Alliance/Horde war or world PvP stuff compelling. Just on that basic statement. But I don't personally feel the need to be justified to fight or inflict war to do this in WoW. It's not about me or how I see the world or sociopolitical issues and I don't feel the need to have a side to pick that matches my idea of those. This is about story. About the characters within the world we're navigating and the characters whom we play as.

idiggory wrote:
Yeeeeeeah, that's racism. It's no different than how my Great Uncle had issues with the Japanese after WWII. It was still racism, even though he felt justified in it.

That's the key for me. I don't, in my own mind, need to feel that "the ****" or "filthy green-skins/puny humans" are my true enemy, the complete monsters that make me need to kill them to stop them all. I can sink into Azeroth, knowing that this is a world with bitterness used as a banner of righteousness and people who won't let themselves face the idea that maybe they're the complete tools who need to change. I don't need to feel my side is right or allowed to do what it's doing. I simply want to understand the decisions they're all making and enjoy their dramatic results.

As for as justification goes, I'm not sure how there could be any. We're playing as people like mages who set fire to other people to burn them alive! We root people to the spot so they can't do anything but stand there while our friends run swords through them and slowly beat their heads in with a blunt mace. There's probably a whole bunch of stuff that we each do every time we play that none of us feel could ever really be justified. That disconnect from ourselves is a significant element.


Edited, Oct 25th 2011 4:24am by Smallsword
#41 Oct 24 2011 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
My politics when it comes to games are radically different from what they are in the real world. I just need more motivation than "Kill them, because they have green skin!"
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#42 Oct 25 2011 at 12:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
My politics when it comes to games are radically different from what they are in the real world. I just need more motivation than "Kill them, because they have green skin!"
How about because they keep killing all your questgivers?

How about because their wickerman is inside the city, while ours is outside? Or because Garrosh shot first?

Come now, idiggory. Grab a sword and fight the Horde!


Or, you know, how about things like land and limited resources? Or what happened in Icecrown, when all should have worked together to fight the Scourge?

Edited, Oct 25th 2011 12:14am by Poldaran
#43 Oct 25 2011 at 1:05 AM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Land, limited resources, etc. are all well and good. They certainly help explain the escalation in violence. But it doesn't really give the whole picture (or even the important part of it). It's not like Azeroth is barren--those resources are so necessary because the factions are at war. If they weren't, the need for raw materials would be a small fraction of what it is currently.

And, realistically, all the racial leaders have way more important things on their mind than Varian's and Garrosh's war. Malfurion and Tyrande are dealing with the actual fate of the world (and the NE lands are perhaps one of the most heavily taxed by the recent years). The Council of Three Hammers is still in a power vacuum, and Ironforge has enough internal race issues to deal with. Gnomes have never been interested in war, and now they are fighting on the Gnomer front.

Only the Worgen have any real reason to fight right now, because Garrosh has actually occupied their homeland (which they obviously want back) and murdered their friends, family and children.

On the Horde side? Tauren only have any real issue with the Dwarves, and it's largely based around what right the Dwarves have to excavate their old cities. It's probably something diplomacy could solve if they hadn't been forced into war anyway. Plus, they have enough to deal with where the Grim Totems and leadership are concerned. Trolls have no immediate problems with the Alliance, and are concerned with setting up a new nation. Goblins are also just building a new state, without any particular disdain for other races (though earning some from NEs for how they treat Azshara's wildlife, since it's one of their ancestral homes). But they were ordered to do that by Garrosh, so it's not like they can be blamed for it. Forsaken are dealing with their declining population. Plus, they are equal-oportunity haters.

Realistically, the only reason this war is being waged is because of the pushes of Varian and Garrosh. EVERY other racial group would benefit hugely from the war's end. And only the Orcs/humans have anything they could realistically hope to gain from the conflict.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#44 Oct 25 2011 at 1:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Forsaken are dealing with their declining population. Plus, they are equal-oportunity haters.
I'm not sure if I like their methods for doing so, though.

I'm not so sure it's racist for hating/fearing a group of undead when they've already shown that they have no qualms with plaguing the **** out of others to increase their own numbers.


idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Only the Worgen have any real reason to fight right now, because Garrosh has actually occupied their homeland (which they obviously want back) and murdered their friends, family and children.
That's the thing about alliances, though. You help your allies so that they'll help you when you need it. Though I can't say that they're the only ones. The Horde has invaded traditionally Night Elf lands in order to harvest the **** out of their forest. Unless it backs off, I'd say they have genuine grievances with the Horde as well. I'm sure few have forgotten the blood spilled in the conflict over said land.
#45 Oct 25 2011 at 1:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
Can I just raise a point of order.

We're all - quite rightly IMO - conditioned to react to the word "racism" because it is a bad thing. I'm not going to argue about that. The point about the disconnect between games and reality has already been made.

However unless some loremaster wants to tell me different we are not dealing with racism in WoW but with something else entirely - Speciesism?

Races are gene-pool variants of the same species able to freely interbreed.

I know I've seen some references to NE being warped out of proto-trolls by the Well. And Lantresor in Nagrand claims to be a hybrid orc/draenor. And there's a woman in Sholazar who seems to be married to a gnome Smiley: nod

But these aberrations don't really make up for the fact that orcs evolved somewhere completely different from humanity. Dwarfs are apparently a mutation from the Titan-created Earthen. Trolls pre-date everybody etc etc.

Now they are all people but not strictly speaking "races" therefore their hatred for each other is not racism - an emotive word we do not wish to be associated with - but something else. The use of the word "race" to describe the different types in WoW obviously lends itself to the derivation but I don't think it is helpful.

Orcs - to pick an example - sees no difference between wiping out NE in Ashenvale and Quillboards in the Barrens. Both are inferior irrelevancies occupying prime land.
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#46 Oct 25 2011 at 3:06 AM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
In the context of video games, species are rarely used to discern between humanoids. Generally speaking, if you are a humanoid variant, that variant is your race. This is especially important since most games allow for interracial breeding of characters (half orc/half draenei for instance--and they weren't even from the same planet).
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#47 Oct 25 2011 at 3:14 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
In the context of video games, species are rarely used to discern between humanoids. Generally speaking, if you are a humanoid variant, that variant is your race. This is especially important since most games allow for interracial breeding of characters (half orc/half draenei for instance--and they weren't even from the same planet).


I completely agree.

I'm just saying that "Race" hate in WoW is not the same as "Racism" IRL.

Its a bit moot since I don't actually hate anybody - or maybe I hate everybody equally. I'm never really sure.
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#48 Oct 25 2011 at 4:43 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,764 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Yeeeeeeah, that's racism. It's no different than how my Great Uncle had issues with the Japanese after WWII. It was still racism, even though he felt justified in it. It's not like he [Garrosh] hated a political entity, because the New Horde wasn't the same construct as the old Horde (which still existed, and was an enemy of the new Horde). And Thrall, who he hated so badly, had never even been a member of the old Horde, but had rather spent his life trying to foster peace.

Just because he feels justified, doesn't mean it's not racism.

And Garrosh is TOTALLY doing this for race reasons. He thinks that the NEs are inferior to Orcs and, therefore, don't have any right to the land. The only race besides Orcs he respects are the Tauren.

You can't even justify Garrosh's actions in terms of him wanting revenge. The Alliance have never done anything to cause him pain (on the contrary, it's because of Jaina that his own father was saved from his demonic taint). He thinks that the Alliance races are inferior and, as such, they deserve to die. And he actually ordered Sylvanas to purge every human (which includes civilians and children) from Gilneas, despite the fact that they had NEVER been involved with the conflict on either side and posed no threat at all to him.

That's not conquering, it's genocide. I haven't seen anything to support the theory that Garrosh would accept a surrender.

Edited, Oct 24th 2011 9:28pm by idiggory

We're arguing semantics, then. If by racism, you mean that any of the groups in WoW feel that their race is superior to another... that's true of pretty much all of them. Goblins and Gnomes, Elves and Dwarves (and that's pretty true throughout all fantasy literature), Night Elves and Blood Elves, Orcs and Humans, etc, etc. The Tauren are the only non-racists of the lot of them.

No real-world comparison for orcs vs humans really works, though. The two sides met when the orcs invaded, and there hasn't been any sort of prolonged peace between them since they first came into conflict. A few years here, a few years there... mostly just long enough for one side or the other to start to rebuild their military. Some of the earliest human and orc quests involve fighting the other side. The peace from the last few expansions hasn't been absolute, and you could make the case that both sides were pragmatic enough to realize that neither of them were strong enough to defeat Illidan/Arthas. I think it's naive to think that at least some of the military leaders weren't hoping that the conflict would cause the other side more casualties and give their own side an advantage once the inter-faction war resumed.
#49 Oct 25 2011 at 7:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I don't hate gnomes, I just don't like little people.

Yeah, you heard me. I said 'little people'.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#50 Oct 25 2011 at 8:40 AM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Think about the sacking of Taurajo. That was almost definitely the result of the Alliance commander's racism towards Tauren. It definitely wasn't a significant military target, and the way they "warned" the villagers was a joke. Most of the dead were civilians who lived relatively peaceful, mundane lives.

Or how about how the Horde attacked Auberdine's new camp right after the Cata. It was a civilian town. And remember how they did it? They promised aid to the local troll group (which the NEs mention they had always left alone, since they never hurt anyone) so they could finally afford to attack the NEs they hated so much (of course, Troll/Elf hatred is pretty standard lore).

This story can be repeated many, many times on both sides. There are plenty of instances of the Horde attacking towns or other alliance areas where there are no military outposts. I'm sure that's the case the other way around, too.

Those are racist-fueled attacks.

Quote:
We're arguing semantics, then. If by racism, you mean that any of the groups in WoW feel that their race is superior to another... that's true of pretty much all of them.


It's more than that. A sense of your personal superiority (which is still a manifestation of racism) is one thing, but the WoW factions actively attack other groups based on it.

And I don't think it's true that they all have superiority complexes. It's true of most of the Horde races, minus Tauren, but the only Alliance race that I'd say had a superiority complex is the NEs.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#51 Oct 25 2011 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
988 posts
I just can't seem to figure it out. Sylvanas has become just as much of a threat to the Horde as to the Alliance. Especially Garrosh has quite a bit of a problem on his left flank now. He opposed the use of the plague, but gave in when he realized that he couldn't exactly stand up against Sylvanas anymore.

So there is trouble ahead, but unless Varian sees an opportunity to finish of an enemy weakened by internal quarrels and power plays, I don't quite understand why he wouldn't just mind his own business.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 271 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (271)