What bugs me is the "which is not a legislated crime at the moment" interjection. What purpose does it serve? Most of the presentation is neutral, there's effort made to stress neutrality (no IP logging or personal information), and then you have the above aside suggesting approval while the survey itself says
Quote:
"The results of this research may be used to help the researcher Nicholas Patterson to obtain a philosophy doctorate and design a cost effective solution, which will save many innocent people from losing their digital assets and wiping out a vast problem that exists in these virtual worlds."
which suggests disapproval.
Back when I was more involved with Psychology (one freshman class and then living with a major while she was Thesising) it was stressed upon us that how the survey is written is critical to the results received, and that a consistent tone was integral. This was up to eleven years ago though, so I'm curious if things have changed.
EDIT: and Rhodekylle's comments were toward this forum in particular. It's small enough to have a tight-knit forum community while prominent enough to be caught up in the net whenever somebody wants to do a survey of WoW players. In some cases such as yours the surveyer is alert enough to get permission first but relatively recently we had a flood of poorly-written surveys that were apparently assigned by a teacher who didn't teach the kids how to do a proper one. Lots of "I'm trying to show that gamers are introverted. plz respond."
In addition we don't support hackers. In order to maintain it's officially sanctioned (or however it's qualified) status Zam has a zero-tolerance policy on discussion of hacks or cheats, and so while I'm sure some lurkers are more open to the idea most of the people here are more likely to have been victims. And it's understandable to get hostility from a victim.
I don't know where you've posted this survey and what results you may get, but if things don't work out I suggest designing a survey about hacking/theft in general, for victims and perpetrators alike as well as general feelings. It could be presented in a much more approachable manner and then you can filter out the data points of people who say they've stolen digital goods to do your *actual* analysis. As I said my survey experience is rather old and you're the PhD student so you probably know better than I, but I dislike making criticisms without offering solutions.
Edited, Aug 22nd 2011 11:20pm by selebrin Edited, Aug 22nd 2011 11:21pm by selebrin