Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Things you miss from WotlkFollow

#1 Feb 19 2011 at 7:15 PM Rating: Decent
Cata is a big disappointment so far, I just can't get into the game like before, so here some points I'm missing from Wotlk.

1- The music, Cata is awful
2- LK > Deathwing, I just don't feel it in Cata to go after a dragon
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded
4- 20 mins heroics
5- Miss to have 25 quests in my log, Cata is to linear
6- Feral....
7- Questing zones was much better in Wotlk
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play

Do you miss Wotlk?
#2 Feb 19 2011 at 7:30 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,157 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
Cata is a big disappointment so far, I just can't get into the game like before, so here some points I'm missing from Wotlk.

1- The music, Cata is awful
2- LK > Deathwing, I just don't feel it in Cata to go after a dragon
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded
4- 20 mins heroics
5- Miss to have 25 quests in my log, Cata is to linear
6- Feral....
7- Questing zones was much better in Wotlk
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play

Do you miss Wotlk?

You can't be serious. You've listed the things I DON'T miss.
The Music in Lich King was 30 versions of "Somber cold song."
The Lich King always was a pampered rich Mary Sue. From WC3 I hated that whimp.
Dalaran was always way overcrowded, at least Orgy and Stormy are spread out.
20 minute heroics were watered down and boring. *Aoe Aoe Aoe spam C/Ds on 10 second boss*
25 quests at a time is just longer to clear your log.
Feral does have issues, but it's still top 10 DPS if I remember right, and a Bear was used for the world first Sinestra.
WotLK zones were 90% snow, nothing was interesting about them. ZulDrak is a zone I hope to NEVER do again, I did it once and it sucked.
If you have less to do in Cata than Lich, you're doing something wrong. You can still random, you can still raid. You can still do dailies. You can still do LICH KING dailies, and randoms, and raids.

What DO I miss from WotLK? Waiting for and playing Cata Beta.
#3 Feb 19 2011 at 7:31 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Don't like how Cataclysm changed a lot of mechanics and styles completely. Didn't really feel it was needed and it seems to have taken on the rolling snowball effect by now.

And I don't like the general attitude I come across in PUGs. People are a lot more hostile and less forgiving now. Probably due in part to the wait times, but also because the amount of goofing around you can do has been cut down to the bone. Even in a regular dungeon, if you make a bad pull, things end in tears.

I miss the feeling of wanting to log on and run some dungeons for laughs. Now I run them out of necessity, trying to farm gear for content I'll never do anyway.

Basically, right now, I'm playing just to play the game. The addiction is what's keeping me here. The game itself has turned bland really fast.

Edit: The linear questing is a double-edged sword. I like the way it involves you in an actual story and the phasing enabling you to actually see the progress you're making. However, the linearity also makes questing really, really boring the third, or even second, time you're going through it. I don't like that I have to do the same quests all the way to 85. Sure, I can pick between Mt. Hyjal and Vashj'ir, but holy crap, it's not like I haven't done both zones multiple times already.

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 2:34am by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4 Feb 19 2011 at 7:36 PM Rating: Default
***
3,157 posts
See, I'm the opposite. I was playing Lich just to play, just to get the 'latest gear' from the latest raid. Now, I log on and actually have to ask myself which alt to level. I'm in a stuck situation on which main to level once Cata comes in the mail next week.
I see the "Oh, I've done both starting zones twice" dilemma, but I was getting pretty damn tired of Fjord and Tundra the third time through.
#5 Feb 19 2011 at 7:40 PM Rating: Default
jaysgsl wrote:
I'm in a stuck situation on which main to level once Cata comes in the mail next week.
Let me know what you think when you actually played Cata...
#6 Feb 19 2011 at 7:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
jaysgsl wrote:
See, I'm the opposite. I was playing Lich just to play, just to get the 'latest gear' from the latest raid. Now, I log on and actually have to ask myself which alt to level. I'm in a stuck situation on which main to level once Cata comes in the mail next week.
I see the "Oh, I've done both starting zones twice" dilemma, but I was getting pretty damn tired of Fjord and Tundra the third time through.


I was complaining about the linearity back in WOTLK as well. Having two starting zones (and now just one, unless you're a mad ********* of some kind) is really not awesome.

And sure you have to ask yourself what alt to play. So did I in early WOTLK and early TBC, hell, most of my Vanilla time was spent wondering what class to play. However, once you're at cap with most of your alts, what then?

Do I want to log on my Paladin and tank a dungeon? No. Why not? Because tanking even a regular dungeon feels like a chore. Okay, so what about my Druid? He's a tank as well. Okay, what about healing? No, also a chore and people yell at you if you mess up. Okay, so DPS? Sure, 40-minute queues rock. How about PvP? Okay, can I get full Brutality first? Sure, just farm some dunge-- *snap*

Really, I understand why they changed the way dungeons were and everything. Some people found WOTLK dungeons extremely boring and not really rewarding. My problem is that the dungeons still get boring over time and the rewards are nowhere near worth the effort now. Not even with JP dropping from regulars.

Edit: It's that there's no feeling of progressing, I guess. Whether I'm healing a heroic at ilvl 329 or 350, it still feels the same. I never feel like I'm on top of things. It doesn't feel like my character's ability to traverse a heroic dungeon successfully increases at all. Sure, my biggest heals crit for 40k instead of 32k, but really, it makes no real difference.

I'm sure this expansion is huge fun for guilds and all, which is what Ghostcrawler more or less made clear in his blog as well, but as a pretty regular player who only runs with pick-up groups, this expansion... it's killing me. Personal opinion, of course.

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 3:07am by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#7 Feb 19 2011 at 8:08 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
Let me know what you think when you actually played Cata...


How about, instead of being an ***, you stop and consider the fact that jay was in the beta and the amount of time he's played Cata dwarfs the amount of time you have.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#8 Feb 19 2011 at 8:09 PM Rating: Excellent
ooo... THIS is going to be a popular rated up thread!

My impression of cata is that it oddly seems slanted towards endgame and pvp, while what it excelled at was questing (with the caveat of it's linear nature making alt levelling less interesting.)

There's just less of some of the things that kept me happily occupied in Wrath. Dailies aren't as plentiful or rewarding. Therazane's an ok parallel to Sons of Hodir, but I'm remembering Oracles/Frenzies, Kalu'ak, Brunnhildar... all with fun rewards (til they mistakingly gave the Kalu'ak pet to everyone). Cooking and fishing are dull as dishwater with the recently added old poles added to fishing as new incentive.

I do miss a sanctuary city, but accept that as lore appropriate.

Heroics are too much like mini-raids and take way too much time for what's supposed to eventually be a daily routine task. Once all you need are the valor badges, they're simply not worth doing.

The guild perks have more negative than positive effects for those not interested in them. As a casual I actually played less with others on my realm than before and it became an even less social game (I was once kicked from a realm group with the explanation, offered only after having asked for it, that a guildie wanted in).

I doubt my perspective is helped by the fact that my favorite toons happen to be by numerous accounts currently the least fun to play. Once it becomes necessary to search for fun, well... I'm taking advice I dished out a long time ago and am on a break (feels moreso this time as if it might be a permanent one.)

So much work went into this by designers who clearly have a love for the game, so it seems pissy to focus on negatives. But I have to admit that although I enjoyed levelling a great deal, Cata is not something I feel compelled to come back to on a regular basis. It's more like a standalone game that I play once and set on the shelf. It resembles my favorite adventure games in that way and others I suppose.

#9 Feb 19 2011 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,157 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
jaysgsl wrote:
I'm in a stuck situation on which main to level once Cata comes in the mail next week.
Let me know what you think when you actually played Cata...

I've played around 40% of Cata in the redesigned zones, and I played endgame, including raiding, in the Beta. I was honestly so happy with the beta that my Live account collected dust for the longest time.
The above statements apply to content I've experienced and seen. Especially the part about Mary Arthas Sue.
#10 Feb 19 2011 at 9:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,441 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
Cata is a big disappointment so far, I just can't get into the game like before, so here some points I'm missing from Wotlk.

1- The music, Cata is awful


I liked the music at Riplash Strand (the 'ruined coastline theme'), and Sholazar Basin's themes are just plain awesome. All of them. Also, a few of the 'tech' pieces played in the Titan-made buildings/areas/caves are cool too.

Quote:
2- LK > Deathwing, I just don't feel it in Cata to go after a dragon


Dude, this isn't some paladin who fell and put on a cursed crown who is now in control of some walking corpses... Deathwing is an -aspect-, perhaps more powerful than Alextrasza herself! He's a HUGE dragon, who very well lives up to his name.

Quote:
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded


As if Dalaran wasn't! lol. Dalaran was worse for crowding, though I WILL admit I enjoyed the portal and One-Hearth Location Fits All.

Quote:
4- 20 mins heroics


Faster H queues were kinda nice, but then again, it is early in the expansion yet. Wait until more casuals get ahold of 359s after a raid tier has been released. You'll see shorter Qs.

Quote:
5- Miss to have 25 quests in my log, Cata is to linear


I like linear questing; areas actually change as you quest through them, and it feels more epic, and there's no logistics math to be done ("Hmm, should I do 3, 4, 5 and 6 and then go over and do 7 and 8.... or should I do 7, 8 and then do 3,4,5,6?").

Quote:
6- Feral....


Some classes have taken a hard beating, sure. But I'm quite sure that hunters and Arms Warriors are now enjoying the game. I know I -hated- leveling my hunter in Wrath, having to turn Viper on every few shots and KCs. That, and BM was laughed at, and not even viable in any sort of group play. Arms Warriors? They were just a stepping stone for Fury once you got enough +Hit gear. Now, Arms are making a comeback. That's not the only two examples, either.

Quote:
7- Questing zones was much better in Wotlk


I'm not a huge fan of Vashj'ir, but I did thoroughly enjoy Hyjal, Deepholm and Twilight Highlands. Uldum is OK, but nothing to write home about IMO.

Quote:
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play


So basically, if it isn't easy enough that everything gets handed to you, it isn't worth playing? Am I getting that right? Mobs were way too easy (even with just quested gear, everything died in 5 seconds or less, you couldn't even get out a full rotation!), and some areas are just plain annoying, and the grind from 70 to 80 just seemed.... longer... than 80 to 85. I'm actually planning on getting Cataclysmic Loremaster on the majority of my characters, but Northrend Loremaster? Meh. Boooooring.

Also, I HATED the ridiculous number of Group Quests, and I'm thankful there's only 1 Group Quest chain in Cataclysm.

Quote:
Do you miss Wotlk?


I have fond memories of Wrath, but yet, I'm also enjoying Cataclysm as well.

Also, the new 1-60 content is just plain awesome. I'm thoroughly enjoying leveling a couple lowbies as well. I just wish that 60-80 wasn't so boring.

One thing I DO miss from Wrath, though:

VRYKUL.

I loved their voice-acted on-aggro taunts.

We need more of that.

Edited, Feb 19th 2011 10:18pm by Lyrailis
#11 Feb 19 2011 at 11:10 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
Cata is a big disappointment so far, I just can't get into the game like before, so here some points I'm missing from Wotlk.

1- The music, Cata is awful
2- LK > Deathwing, I just don't feel it in Cata to go after a dragon
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded
4- 20 mins heroics
5- Miss to have 25 quests in my log, Cata is to linear
6- Feral....
7- Questing zones was much better in Wotlk
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play

Do you miss Wotlk?

1) I listen to my own music.

2) I prefer Deathwing.

3) Dalaran was awful, though convenient.

4) Heroics were awful, they weren't heroic.

5) Linear is good, it develops a story.

6) QQ.

7) Uldum alone beats every single zone in WotLK (which are pretty much all boring as hell). Bear trampoline quest also makes Hyjal better than every WotLK zone.

8) I have much more to do in Cata, BGs, TB, farming on my hunter, etc.

Do I miss WotLK? Kinda. At times I miss the PvP (globalling people was fun), but I can't say I miss it too much.
#12 Feb 19 2011 at 11:12 PM Rating: Default
***
3,157 posts
I admit that killing low geared people by knocking them out of the Naxx stone was hella fun. I think Thunderstorm and Druid Wave were my two most used abilities before Naxx.
#13 Feb 20 2011 at 1:21 AM Rating: Good
**
530 posts
I respect your opinion but I think some of the issues you have are avoidable.

1. Listen to your own music or listen to the OST from the past games, think of it as a remix; old music to new content.
2. WOTLK had dragons all over. OS, Malygos, and sarth all looked 'dragony' to me.
3. go to IF or one of the other cities.
4. short and to the point
5. run all over and grab any/every quest you can
6. don't roll a druid
7. all the expansions have/had zones that players both loved and loathed
8. it seems like it's mostly the same stuff. dailies, instances, pvp, trade channel banter.


#14 Feb 20 2011 at 1:42 AM Rating: Good
****
7,861 posts
I don't really miss it. 80-85 went way faster than 70-75, for me anyway.
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#15 Feb 20 2011 at 3:40 AM Rating: Excellent
****
5,729 posts
Mazra wrote:
The linear questing is a double-edged sword. I like the way it involves you in an actual story and the phasing enabling you to actually see the progress you're making. However, the linearity also makes questing really, really boring the third, or even second, time you're going through it. I don't like that I have to do the same quests all the way to 85. Sure, I can pick between Mt. Hyjal and Vashj'ir, but holy crap, it's not like I haven't done both zones multiple times already.

Agreed. While it's really interesting to see the whole story unfold in a single epic quest chain, it gets really old really fast. I much prefer having a lot of stand alone quests and shorter chains over the cata system.

First off, when you have one single quest chain there's no option to skip anything. Period. A quest is too hard or annoying or you just don't feel like doing it? Too bad. You have no choice because not doing the quest prevents you from doing anything else in the entire zone. Does the whole war effort really grind to a halt if I don't bring a guy an eel fillet or something?

Second, having multiple independent quest hubs scattered throughout the zone gives you more variety. You can pick and choose the quests you want to do, letting you potentially have a different questing experience on my second, third, eighth time through the zone. I miss having the option to say "I did the quests at X Outpost the few times I was here. Let's see what Y Outpost has to offer."

Another part of the issue is that there are just plain fewer new zones his time around. BC had 7 zones and wrath had 8 while cata only has 5 (not counting end level daily hubs like Quel'Danas and Tol Barad.) Right off the bat you have less to work with, and without quest hubs to let you jump around it's a VERY limited (and IMO boring after the first time) questing experience.

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 3:56am by Karlina
____________________________
75 Rabbit/75 Sheep/75 Coeurl/75 Eft/75 Raptor/75 Hippogryph/75 Puk
75 Scorpion/75 Wamoura/75 Pixie/75 Peiste/64 Sabotender
51 Bird/41 Mandragora/40 Bee/37 Crawler/37 Bat

Items no one cares about: O
Missions no one cares about: O
Crafts no one cares about: O
#16 Feb 20 2011 at 6:25 AM Rating: Good
**
799 posts
Kastigir wrote:
I don't really miss it. 80-85 went way faster than 70-75, for me anyway.


strangely, 80-85 went faster than 75-80 for me!
considering the multi-million exp requirements of each level, I was really expecting to have no toons at 85 until next year. It took me forever to cap one pair of toons (I suffer from terminal acute altitis) in WotLK, however I find myself with three pairs of toons now almost at 85, with one solo toon (I mostly dual-box) already capped at 85 AND all his crafts capped.

Even my crafts are capped on a couple of toons: mostly cooking, but also Inscription, Alchemy, and Engineering (gotta love those multi-exp-point recipes).

#17 Feb 20 2011 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
***
3,441 posts
Quote:
3. go to IF or one of the other cities.


Errr.

You're presented with two options:

1). Hearth in Lagwind/Lagrimmar and have easy access to JC/Fishing/Cooking dailies and the Cataclysm Portals, or

2). Hearth anywhere else and have to travel to Lagwind/Lagrimmar to have access to the same (which accounts for 99% of everything you do in Cataclysm). Since you must go through Lagwind/Lagrimmar anyway (unless you're running a banker alt, or leveling a character <80), you might as well just.... hearth in Lagwind/Lagrimmar and remove the redundant step.
#18 Feb 20 2011 at 9:16 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,761 posts
I like Cata, but I will say in arena I liked the healer balance a little better in WoTLK. I don't like that all healers have a magic dispell now, I feel it puts holy paladins at a disadvantage in 3v3 it was a huge thing we brought to the table while every other healer had offensive utility. Now every healer has the same thing we do plus they have better offense/CC.

Paladins used to run cleave teams because we could dispell melee and keep them on target. Now every healer can do that. Hand of freedom is simply dispelled in 1 global in high rated arena. A cleave comp is simply better off with a non paladin. Teammate gets hexed, a druid/shaman can decurse that and they can dispell magic as well. Priests can do 2 magic dispells per global. They all have better CC. Paladins did get a melee interupt to be fair, but melee range for a paladin is a bad place to be. In high rated arena paladins are on the very bottom right now and I dont see that changing without some big changes to the game and healer mechanics.
#19 Feb 20 2011 at 9:24 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Cata is a big disappointment so far, I just can't get into the game like before, so here some points I'm missing from Wotlk.


It's all still there, it hasn't been taken away.

Quote:
1- The music, Cata is awful


/shrugs - mixed bag - some is good, some bad

Quote:
2- LK > Deathwing, I just don't feel it in Cata to go after a dragon


The LK was a whiny little emo brat.

Quote:
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded


And Dal wasn't? At least now you're only dealing with toons from your own faction - in LK you had both sides in Dal.

Quote:
4- 20 mins heroics


I take it you didn't start playing LK until a few months in when everyone was geared up enough to make the previous hour plus long heroics into 20m cake runs?

Quote:
5- Miss to have 25 quests in my log, Cata is to linear


??? If you had more then a dozen quests in LK it was because you either had too many dailies on you or you'd gone ADD and were wandering from zone to zone grabbing stuff.

Quote:
6- Feral....


Learn to play the class and you'll be fine naked with a spork.

Quote:
7- Questing zones was much better in Wotlk


I don't see any real difference personally.

Quote:
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play


Glad to hear all of your alts are at 85, have GS of close to 400 and that you've beaten the final boss in all the current 25m raids available.
#20 Feb 20 2011 at 9:32 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
See, I completely disagree about the questing--I LOVE the linear hubs. But maybe that's because I essentially always quested the same way--gathering every quest in town and then going to the area where I could complete the most. It was boring. And the quests were often only slightly relevant to the story of the zone.

I see losing hubs that will offer a bunch of unrelated quests that send you to different parts of the zone as 100% a blessing.

And you finally get to really feel involved with the story...

Other things:

1. I love the music... mostly. I hate Orgrimmar's song. But other than that I liked everything I've heard so far. The music doesn't always fit the zone perfectly, imo, but part of that may be preconceptions. Whatever song plays on the login/character-creation screen, I really like.

2. The LK and Deathwing are totally different types of enemies. Most of the fear of the LK was concentrated in his army of the living dead. Deathwing, on the other hand, is more terrifying than the LK BEFORE you consider his legion of dragons and insane followers.

3. I do miss Dal, but because I really liked Dal. And it was WAY more crowded than SW/Org ever was.

4. Nope.

6. Feral is a perfectly viable PvE spec. It's only in an odd place in PvP.

7. There were zones I liked in NR, and some I wasn't so fond of. Same for the rest of the game. But the design of the zones in Cata is definitely better.

8. How do you have nothing to do? Run dungeons, do bgs, ranked bgs, raid, dailies. You have MORE options in Cata, along with all the old ones.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#21 Feb 20 2011 at 9:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Countering personal opinion with differing personal opinions isn't really useful.

Some people prefer the Lich King while others prefer Deathwing. Some prefer having options with regards to questing, others prefer to be tunneled through it. Some prefer the music in Wrath of the Lich King, others prefer the music in Cataclysm, or The Burning Crusade, or Vanilla.

I prefer the Lich King as an end-game boss (mainly due to Warcraft 3), being able to pick and choose quest hubs and I don't have the in-game music turned on. That differs from a lot of other players, but I still reserve the right to have my personal opinions. Smiley: wink

Anyone who replies to this thread with "ZOMG are you kidding? Cataclysm is so much better and stuffs" didn't get the point of the thread. RAWDEAL isn't saying that Cataclysm is awful, period. He says it's awful to him and then lists eight reasons. I believe he's well within his rights to feel this way about the expansion without someone trying to project their own feelings onto him.

Disagree and present arguments to back it up, sure, but just going "UR WROENG!" is bad. Bad troll. Bad!
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#22 Feb 20 2011 at 10:49 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
It's not so much that Raw's opinions differ, it's that he'd being an asshat to those that don't agree with him.

And:
Quote:
3- Dalaran, SW/Org are way to crowded
...
8- I had lot more to do in Wotlk; I just stare at my screen in Cata wondering if I want to play


These two are just not valid. He's perfectly free to FEEL that way, but that doesn't mean he's right. Because neither of these are an opinion--he's making a claim about the way things actually are.

SW and Org are NOT more crowded than Dal. You get clusters between the banks/AHs, but that's it. Dalaran was always packed early in the expansion. The only thing that led people to any other hub was if they needed to use the AH. It just isn't true that SW/Org are more crowded. Dalaran was the main hub servicing two factions. SW/Org service one (but, to be fair, they're probably more than half Dal's population due to the AH). And they're WAY larger than Dal.

And not wanting to do anything != having nothing to do.

Cata only added options--it didn't take any away.

You can do all the old things, like dailies, bgs, dungeons, professions. You can do new things like the new bgs, rated bgs, Tol Barad. And leveling a character is actually fun again.

Just because you don't want to do any of it doesn't mean that you have nothing to do.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#23 Feb 20 2011 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
idiggory wrote:
These two are just not valid. He's perfectly free to FEEL that way, but that doesn't mean he's right. Because neither of these are an opinion--he's making a claim about the way things actually are.


He said he missed Dalaran and then remarked that Stormwind and Orgrimmar are too crowded. I can only agree on both points.

And #8 is a personal opinion.

idiggory wrote:
You can do all the old things, like dailies, bgs, dungeons, professions. You can do new things like the new bgs, rated bgs, Tol Barad. And leveling a character is actually fun again.

Just because you don't want to do any of it doesn't mean that you have nothing to do.


When an expansion hits, content gets outdated and left behind. Northrend is just as dead as Outland now. You can't really do Wrath content anymore, because there are no one there. Wrath heroics have longer queues than Cataclysm dungeons. At least on my server.

Now, as for doing what you did in Wrath, the entire point here seems to be that Cataclysm isn't Wrath and thus, doing "what you did back then" isn't the same. I know I leveled up my professions in less than a week. I'm now decked in heroic gear with literally no reason to run heroics, at all, except for once a day. And as for PvP, I don't really feel like getting ripped a new one right now.

Also, the leveling comment is your personal opinion. I found the first time funny, but now that I'm leveling character number five through Mount Hyjal, stuff's getting old.

I agree that RAWDEAL shouldn't be an ***, though.

It's all my personal opinion, of course. Some disagree and I don't mind that, but I feel what I feel and no amount "you're wrong, because I think..." is going to change it. I'm assuming RAWDEAL feels the same way, as do everyone else. Hence the discussion in the first place.

Edit: Never mind, I'm on a roll tonight.

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 6:34pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#24 Feb 20 2011 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
***
3,441 posts
Quote:
He said he missed Dalaran and then remarked that Stormwind and Orgrimmar are too crowded. I can only agree on both points.


That's like... driving a white car, wrecking it, and then buying a new white car that's a different make and model and then going "I miss the last car; this one's white."

It is just stupid, and doesn't make a lick of sense.

Edit: Now, if there are -other reasons- he likes or dislikes the towns, then he should have said so. But the way he worded it, he makes it sound like that the population density is what he doesn't like about the new towns. If that were true, then he would have/should have disliked Dalaran even more back in Wrath, because the population density was worse!

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 12:38pm by Lyrailis
#25 Feb 20 2011 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Lyrailis wrote:
Quote:
He said he missed Dalaran and then remarked that Stormwind and Orgrimmar are too crowded. I can only agree on both points.


That's like... driving a white car, wrecking it, and then buying a new white car that's a different make and model and then going "I miss the last car; this one's white."

It is just stupid, and doesn't make a lick of sense.


Perhaps, and I'm going out on a limb here, he misses Dalaran for other reasons than what you seem to think is a lack of a crowd. Dalaran was crowded, yes, but I don't miss it because Orgrimmar is crowded.

To use your car analogy, it's like wrecking your white car, replacing it with a red and then commenting on how you miss your white car. Makes perfect sense to me.

Lyrailis wrote:
Edit: Now, if there are -other reasons- he likes or dislikes the towns, then he should have said so. But the way he worded it, he makes it sound like that the population density is what he doesn't like about the new towns. If that were true, then he would have/should have disliked Dalaran even more back in Wrath, because the population density was worse!


People read things differently, as indicated by this argument. I didn't read it the way you read it.

And the density was worse in Dalaran, no doubt about it. It was the Shattrath issue all over again, except in a much tighter space. The problem in Orgrimmar right now, for me, is that everyone and their alts is flaunting some huge *** dragon that takes up the space five or six people did in Dalaran.

Teleporting into Orgrimmar is also worse, in terms of lag, than teleporting into Dalaran ever was for me.

Edited, Feb 20th 2011 6:42pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#26 Feb 20 2011 at 11:49 AM Rating: Good
***
3,441 posts
I will admit that they need to do something about mounts.

It seems like Blizz is running out of ideas for "cool flying mounts" that doesn't involve something gigantic (read: drakes/dragons).

I mean, even *I* could come up with cool ideas.

Rocket packs? Can't get any smaller than that. I'd love to go flying through Azeroth with naught but a jetpack. Heck, make it a unique mount so that it also works underwater too (with underwater speed also). The only drawback? No land mount speed. If you land, your character stops using it and starts walking. Maybe QQ about druids would stop if people could use it to mine/herb (going into combat would remove the mounted buff though).

Airplanes? We got helicopters, why not engineering-made small airplanes like those that already exist in the wow-verse? Heck, it could even be a 2-seater, for the really expensive version!

One-person balloons/mini zeppelins. Why not? It wouldn't be that hard to make a small one-seat craft, and stick a balloon and propeller on it. It'd still be smaller than a drake!

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 351 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (351)