Reply To Thread

World First Level 85!Follow

#1 Dec 07 2010 at 9:46 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1592783546241

3 posts

http://news.mmosite.com/content/2010-12-06/wow_gets_its_first_level_85_in_only_5_hours.shtml

Quote:

After only a few hours of Cataclysm being available, Forscience, a Paladin on the European server Neptulon, has already hit level 85, the new level cap introduced in the expansion. Forscience's time to reach the cap is just 5 hours and 30 minutes, shortly after the launch of Cataclysm! Can't imagine how he managed to do that. There must be a great team to help Forscience to be the first person to reach level 85. Anyway, congratulations! Below are some pictures showing when Forscience reached level 85 and according to Forscience, he will put a video showing how they managed to achieve world first.

Every new expansion makes players crazy. Anyhow, Congrats.

#2 Dec 07 2010 at 9:48 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1622420233202

Scholar

11,852 posts

Wow? I guess?

Without any additional information, it sounds like haxz.

#3 Dec 07 2010 at 9:49 AM Rating: Good

View User Forum

Ghost in the Machine

36,443 posts

Neptulon.

Unofficial Bvlgarian server.

____________________________

Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.

#4 Dec 07 2010 at 10:46 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1664756324533

Guru

1,996 posts

Another Athene manipulation.

N.B. Nextone, again citing mmmosite, is the same guy who posted the "Farewell, old Azeroth" thread ... also linking to mmosite. The exact same post was made by "deadplayer" on another site.

My money says -- spammer for mmosite.

#5 Dec 07 2010 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1591946910634

10 posts

Pretty sure I saw realm first somewhere around 14,30 this afternoon. Fast, but not 5-hours fast. Was a Paladin though.

#6 Dec 07 2010 at 10:55 AM Rating: Good

Sage

1,606 posts

94,629 HP... That's like insane! (or is to me)

#7 Dec 07 2010 at 11:21 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1670804250436

1,683 posts

Athene ftw, he knows is shiiiiiiiiiitttttttt! Now take it like a man, don't be jealous.

Love that character!

#8 Dec 07 2010 at 1:53 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1592790778839

Sage

1,609 posts

Mob tagging, he judges it and his team of helpers, not in his group, kill it. He grinded to 85 basically tagging as many mobs as possible. It's within the rules (unlike his dungeon tagging at the WotLK launch where mobs gave 10 times the xp) so i'm guessing it's a legit EU first 85.

#9 Dec 07 2010 at 1:59 PM Rating: Good

View User Forum

Ghost in the Machine

36,443 posts

I thought they killed the "tagging" thing back during TBC, when that Warlock, or whatever he was, did the same thing.

You still get full xp from a kill if someone else does the majority of damage to it?

____________________________

Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.

#10 Dec 07 2010 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1647217076788

Scholar

1,634 posts

Ehhh... Kind of lame.

#11 Dec 07 2010 at 2:53 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1592306579686

Scholar

3,157 posts

When WOTLK launched, I was 80 before most people had run OK. There were three or four people that beat me, but I was more proud of myself (yes, pride in a video game :P ) as I did it the 'honest' way, by questing and dungeons. Everyone else did it by tagging or instance boosting. My server first (who was in my guild) was the worst of them. She'd go to sleep, then her boyfriend would step in and take over.
I don't get why people have to cheat their way to a 'first' even though it's not an earned first.
And, to the OP, stop spamming your ****** website.

#12 Dec 08 2010 at 9:23 AM Rating: Excellent

Sage

1,606 posts

jaysgsl wrote:

When WOTLK launched, I was 80 before most people had run OK. There were three or four people that beat me, but I was more proud of myself (yes, pride in a video game :P ) as I did it the 'honest' way, by questing and dungeons. Everyone else did it by tagging or instance boosting. My server first (who was in my guild) was the worst of them. She'd go to sleep, then her boyfriend would step in and take over.
I don't get why people have to cheat their way to a 'first' even though it's not an earned first.
And, to the OP, stop spamming your sh*tty website.

They do it for the fame and notoriety they will have for the next 4 or 5... seconds it takes for the little blurb to scroll out of the text window.

#13 Dec 08 2010 at 7:01 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1591956200432

Scholar

408 posts

The first 80 on my server was almost exactly 12 hours after launch. I had already played, slept, and came back online when they got it. 5 and a half hours is nuts. Oh, and the first on my server was a Death Knight.

Edited, Dec 8th 2010 8:02pm by Minoran

#14 Dec 08 2010 at 7:21 PM Rating: Good

Sandinmygum

View User Forum

Guru

6,430 posts

Minoran wrote:

The first 80 on my server was almost exactly 12 hours after launch. I had already played, slept, and came back online when they got it. 5 and a half hours is nuts. Oh, and the first on my server was a Death Knight.

Edited, Dec 8th 2010 8:02pm by Minoran

Was a DK on mine as well. I logged on 18 or so hours after launch to see some of the word 1st, but none where done in 5 hours..

____________________________

Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |

#15 Dec 14 2010 at 11:05 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1656893811484

View User Forum

Sage

8,272 posts

Thought this was pretty funny in regards to Athene:

http://www.thedailyblink.com/2010/12/yes-im-aware-ill-get-letters/

#16 Dec 14 2010 at 11:41 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1604276369236

Sage

2,346 posts

My realm first was a Warlock followed by a hunter then shaman.

#17 Dec 14 2010 at 2:13 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1591956200432

Scholar

408 posts

Does anyone else think that going to 85 instead of 90 was a mistake? I hit 85 last night, only a week after Cata released. I play very casually and most of the XP was from Archeology, as I only did one of the new zones. I've done no BGs or dungeons either but you get so much XP from professions that 5 levels is really easy to get.

#18 Dec 14 2010 at 2:26 PM Rating: Excellent

someproteinguy

Meat Popsicle

13,666 posts

Minoran wrote:

I hit 85 last night, only a week after Cata released.

[:envy:]

____________________________

That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover

#19 Dec 14 2010 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1656893811484

View User Forum

Sage

8,272 posts

Minoran wrote:

Does anyone else think that going to 85 instead of 90 was a mistake? I hit 85 last night, only a week after Cata released. I play very casually and most of the XP was from Archeology, as I only did one of the new zones. I've done no BGs or dungeons either but you get so much XP from professions that 5 levels is really easy to get.

The level count isn't what matters, it is the total amount of XP needed to reach that level. Blizzard wanted the leveling process to take approximately the amount of time that it took to get 70-80, and I believe they succeeded for the most part. I'm willing to wager that most people play the game for what happens at level 60/70/80/85 and not what happens in the middle (not that it can't be enjoyed, but generally 'end-game' is what people stick around for).

#20 Dec 14 2010 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1624234677071

Scholar

13,048 posts

Minoran wrote:

Does anyone else think that going to 85 instead of 90 was a mistake? I hit 85 last night, only a week after Cata released. I play very casually and most of the XP was from Archeology, as I only did one of the new zones. I've done no BGs or dungeons either but you get so much XP from professions that 5 levels is really easy to get.

No. I have no problem with 85 being the new cap.

I do somewhat think that it was far easier than it was to level in TBC or WotLK, due to profession exp, but I don't mind much, since I hate leveling.

#21 Dec 14 2010 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

ZAM Administrator

10,601 posts

I didn't find it much easier then Wrath, just leveling with quests and the occasional instance. It's certainly more work to get into heroics then it was in wrath, and I've replaced way more gear then I did in wrath.

____________________________

01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ

#22 Dec 14 2010 at 3:11 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1624234677071

Scholar

13,048 posts

Sir Xsarus wrote:

I didn't find it much easier then Wrath, just leveling with quests and the occasional instance. It's certainly more work to get into heroics then it was in wrath, and I've replaced way more gear then I did in wrath.

Yeah, I kept my Brutal gear well into the first arena season.

Killing people in level 80 epics when I was in 70 epics was hilarious, though.

#23 Dec 14 2010 at 7:51 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1719792976495

View User Forum

Guru

3,973 posts

jaysgsl wrote:

When WOTLK launched, I was 80 before most people had run OK. There were three or four people that beat me, but I was more proud of myself (yes, pride in a video game :P ) as I did it the 'honest' way, by questing and dungeons. Everyone else did it by tagging or instance boosting. My server first (who was in my guild) was the worst of them. She'd go to sleep, then her boyfriend would step in and take over.

Do you think after she got server first they were going at it and he was like:

"Server first babe, Server first..."

and she was all

"SEEEEEEERRRRRVER FIIIIIIRRRRRRST!"

#24 Dec 14 2010 at 8:02 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1592306579686

Scholar

3,157 posts

Hahahaha that would be hilariously geeky.

Reply To Thread

Recent Visitors: 444 All times are in CST

Anonymous Guests (444)

© 2024 Fanbyte LLC