Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Most overpowerd characters since 2.0Follow

#53 Dec 26 2006 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
*
174 posts
I believe you've been dueling Princess for the entirety of your PvP career.

Crits of 100 with a rogue?

Ardent Custodian has a top damage of 90 on a 2.1 speed mace. Dazzling Longsword tops out at 70 with a proc for 100 armor decrease. Throw on that +15 AGI or 'sader. You want to talk about PvP? You think that all the oldbies magically went from 38-60 overnight? Each and every one of us had to spend quite a bit of time PvPing in each bracket to not only get anywhere honor wise, but to kill time aside from the inane ammount of leveling. Nightblade for warriors tops out at 148 dmg. Factor in all their attack power, and on a crit. Not to mention (and this is coming from the point of view of a rogue, as I've played them through 39 3 times >_>) all our +% damage abilities for nifty things like Eviscerate. Basilisk pants alone add +21 Agility, with a +15 on offhand, +9 Stamina here and there. You have either had the luck of fighting a myriad of really bad rogues, or there's some ammount of ******** in your posts. Defiler's stuff is Lv. 38 too, and **** like Fleshhide Shoulders is perfect for PvP (+15 stamina :D).

You want to talk PvP, realize that every class has the potential to beat every other class. As you go down ranks, the ammount of abilities available changes, and off course, it may seem as some classes have a clear advantage over others. However, as I stated in another thread, PvP is far from being a 1 on 1 encounter if it's in battlegrounds. Also, as far as Dueling goes, you obviously haven't seen any geared Locks that can make each and every tiny spell hurt so bad those 2k hit points will have to be replenished quick. As far as rogue goes, Riposte is great against all those nifty abilities, nothing like losing that awesome sword you seem to be doing ungodly damage with. Not to mention a Seal Fate / Cold Blood build can tear through alot, and you only have mail at 39.

So wtf o_O
#54 Dec 26 2006 at 6:29 PM Rating: Decent
I also really hate Shamans. The whole concept is just stupid and overpowered. A class that can heal, take damage, and spells that hit as hard as mages. Not to mention all sorts of other stuff they don't need like totems ( Which can't be destroyed with AoE, which is really stupid IMO ), travel form ( What the hell do they need this for? ), dual wield ( Seriously, WTF? ), mail armor ( Really annoying ), and self-rez ( That's a crime ). Not sure what Blizz was thinking when they decided that they needed a class that can do everything. I like the idea of hybrid classes, but not when it's a hybrid of warrior/druid/rogue/mage/priest , just make it 2 classes or something. I wouldn't mind them so much, but unfortunately there has to be one around every corner when I try and play in BGs.
#55 Dec 26 2006 at 7:56 PM Rating: Decent
*
174 posts
Shamans have never been a big problem for me.

As a rogue, I'm obviously concentrating purely on melee damage, so their lightning shield can -hurt- like a mother. However, if you keep 'em interrupted/silenced and stunned, they fall down pretty quickly (Pretty much as fast as hunters, even more so since they concentrate less on STA than Hunters). I think that while, yeah, they can multitask, they suffer from the druid curse of being jack of all trades and master of none. When you have to minmax so many stats you're not going to come out on top in any of them, and while a -good- shammy or drood can rape quite well, finding someone who can play that balance well is not a common find.

I've not had a hard time against shammies, as I feel that their "I Win" reputation is mostly PvE moreso than PvP. Tbh, as a rogue, the few things that worry me in BG are 3 Minute Mages, Tanking Warriors (Since unless I manage to score some good crits, they always seem to outlast me), and the occasional Warlock that knows exactly how to **** me off.

Not to say other classes don't match up, but I've had enough dueling experience to at least know what to expect and have a basic strategy for them :x
#56 Dec 26 2006 at 9:30 PM Rating: Decent
**
814 posts
Don't bother arguing with him Kiro. He's twinked so ofcourse he owns other level 39's that are non-twinked.

But yea at end game level 60 pally's are pretty bad at doing damamge (compared to the other classes). I do think pally's might be able to kill locks cause of their bubbles. I've seen it happened more then once. Now at level 60 if a pally is beating a hunter, mage, balance druid, or priest; they are doing something wrong. Problem with pally is no control of distance. All a mage has to do is pop blink. Druid travel form. Priest... theirs just no hope. And if you keep ignoring pet to get to hunter, you're gonna die.

As I have said, Pally's are not great 1 on 1. Only thing they have advantage on is warriors and rogues. But last time I saw a pally fight a warrior with herbalism profession, pally lost.

Quote:
If you think locks are OP now then roll a hunter to 60, get silencing shot and then warlocks will be your best friends. =]


Yep =)
#57 Dec 27 2006 at 2:33 PM Rating: Decent
I don't think any class is any better than another. If you know how to play your toon, read guides, and fill your role in a group, you should be fine.
#58 Dec 27 2006 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
Now.
Due to the fact that you are only 39, you have NO idea whatsoever about the level 50 talent spells available to certain casters, Warlocks with their new pets and affliction/destuction spells, treants for balance druids, Improved leader of the pack (Heals you when u crit) as well as mangle, i wont even bother stating the restoration ones.

Anyway
The fact is, for you it is either:
a) are fighting noobs
b) good at your class
c) your getting really lucky
d) you know nothing, get to the 40-49 bracket and l2Play or even better, get to the 50-59 bracket and ill show you how much people that can play their class can crit for, your crits are terrible for ur level imo.

GG
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 296 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (296)