Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Lost my character's underpants (really)Follow

#927 Aug 29 2005 at 3:59 PM Rating: Default
Or else Blizzard will use their magic powers to find our WoW accounts, and then more magic powers to find out who has something in their /Data/ folder?
#928 Aug 29 2005 at 4:26 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
I didn't call anyone nerds or lame.

I said that in my opinion this is lame and the whole thing seems like a nerd's wet dream come true.

I didn't say UR ALL TEH N3RDZ DIE IN HELL U LAM0RZ!1one now did I?

I simply indicated that this subject is

1) Family sensitive. Nipples and vaginas, come on guys.
2) Illegal. Officially stated by Blizzard that it's not allowed.
3) Overrated. Hell yeah.

I messed around with a private server once, wooh, got the Night Elf woman to take off her clothes, revealing.. absolutely nothing!

I just don't get what the hype is all about. Seems so immature.

But go ahead, spam up the forum with a guide on how to illegally modify your client so that you may watch your Night Elf naked.

May I throw in a lolol and omgz too?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#929 Aug 29 2005 at 4:28 PM Rating: Default
Some news for the girls out there:

Hello, i finished my preview of a NUDE HUMAN MAN skin!
look here:
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6334/parade7hn.jpg

translation:
Alt v1/v2/v3 -> this was my OLD/FIRST Version try
Neu 29/08/05 -> this is my NEWEST skin, i think its final.

Tell me your opinions!
ca,skite2001
#930 Aug 29 2005 at 4:36 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Okay, I'd like to rephrase my previous statement.

My god! That's lame!
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#931 Aug 29 2005 at 5:32 PM Rating: Default
V1 and V2 of the nude male seems like the best ones IMHO, the ones on the large pics (full-male model) seem too blurred hair and remind me of a bad paint-job >.<
#932 Aug 29 2005 at 9:32 PM Rating: Default
Mazra wrote:
Yeah, experiencing World of Warcraft in nudity is just something you gotta try.

Would someone kill this thread soon?


Sorry, this thread will be sticking around for a very, very long time.
#933 Aug 29 2005 at 9:44 PM Rating: Default
WizardCaT wrote:
Well, even if this "EU" version guy is correct, they would still have absolutely no way of knowing. If they were ever really concerned about this, they would -easily- make it so the .mpq file over rides ALL and files in the Data folder (or subdirectories) didn't have priority.


I agree... Blizzard seems to be taking opposite stances on this. Different representatives of the company have said different things. I mean, look at the way these patches work... they put a file into the Data directory, which the program decides to use and overwrite anything existing. It's rather obvious the program is designed to have texture patches. It's completely foolish for them to make a rule against it... it would be like building a door in a building, but not locking it, not even putting a "do not use" sign on it, but instead, simply telling anyone who asks "No, you can't use that door." So why the heck is the door there to begin with? It makes no sense.
#934 Aug 29 2005 at 9:50 PM Rating: Default
Mazra wrote:
LordFaust, I'm only hating because I can't ignore the thread myself. And the whole point in this thread seems to be a nerd's wet dream come true.

It's not even ****!

If you'd found naked pictures of the ladies who modeled for NE females, I would give you credit, but all you've done is revealing the stuff underneath what we call underwear. Blizzard haven't even done the kinky stuff so who cares?

And no, I don't want you to draw me a ****** and nipples on my characters.

I'm hating because I can't see why people care so much about cartoon nudity.

It's just lame if you ask me.


We don't care what you think is lame, and as it turns out, you're not the center of the universe. :) We enjoy these things, you obviously don't. There's no need for you to be posting here, telling us how lame you think we are. Personally, I think people who hang out in forums about nude patches just to flame the people in them are some of the biggest losers of all. Don't you have something better to do with your life than sit here and complain about something you admitted yourself you don't understand?
#935 Aug 29 2005 at 9:55 PM Rating: Default
skite wrote:
Some news for the girls out there:

Hello, i finished my preview of a NUDE HUMAN MAN skin!
look here:
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6334/parade7hn.jpg

translation:
Alt v1/v2/v3 -> this was my OLD/FIRST Version try
Neu 29/08/05 -> this is my NEWEST skin, i think its final.

Tell me your opinions!
ca,skite2001


Wow, rather impressive. You going to post links to any/all of those? It will double the amount of races with male nudity.
#936 Aug 30 2005 at 5:25 AM Rating: Default
yep, sure. i'm improving a little bit and then releasing the male models^^
#937 Aug 30 2005 at 6:07 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
A. Blizzard Entertainment expressly reserves the exclusive right to create derivative works based on World of Warcraft. This means that you may not create derivative works based on World of Warcraft, without the prior express, written permission of Blizzard Entertainment.



B. Only Blizzard Entertainment or its licensees have the right to host World of Warcraft! Accordingly, you may not host, provide matchmaking services for, or intercept, emulate or redirect the communication protocols used by Blizzard Entertainment as part of World of Warcraft, regardless of the method used to do so. Such prohibited methods may include, but are not limited to, protocol emulation, reverse engineering, modifying World of Warcraft, adding components to World of Warcraft, or using a utility program to host World of Warcraft.



C. You agree that you will not (i) modify or cause to be modified any files that are a part of a World of Warcraft installation; (ii) create or use cheats, "mods", and/or hacks, or any other third-party software designed to modify the World of Warcraft experience; (iii) use any third-party software that intercepts, "mines", or otherwise collects information from or through World of Warcraft; or (iv) allows players who are playing characters aligned with the "Alliance" faction to chat or otherwise communicate directly with players who are playing characters aligned with the "Horde" faction, or vice versa. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may update World of Warcraft with authorized patches and updates distributed by Blizzard, and use authorized Third Party User Interfaces as set forth in Section 13(f), below


That pretty much makes all this illegal. Since Allakhazam doesn't like to host illegal stuff, I'm guessing this will end soon.

Or hoping...

Have a nice day.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#938 Aug 30 2005 at 6:13 AM Rating: Default
Some improvements done...what do you thing (answer only if you like it!)

i improved the skin now.
Look here:
http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/8150/final1lu.jpg

you can compare it with my older versions:
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6334/parade7hn.jpg

call it FINAL now???

ca,skite2001
#939 Aug 30 2005 at 7:47 AM Rating: Default
That's just... plain weird.
#940 Aug 30 2005 at 10:36 AM Rating: Default
Mazra wrote:
Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
(iii) use any third-party software that intercepts, "mines", or otherwise collects information from or through World of Warcraft;


That pretty much makes all this illegal. Since Allakhazam doesn't like to host illegal stuff, I'm guessing this will end soon.


First of all, "illegal" and "against the rules" are two very different things. Something is only "illegal" if you could get in legal trouble... arrested and such. For things against the terms of use, all they can do is stop you from playing.

Second of all, Allakhazam's own software violates this particular section of the terms of use. Ever hear of Wowreader? Look to your left, under "Character Profiles," there's a place to download it. Allakhazam claims it's an "LUA UI addon," which part of it is, but another part of it (the exe) is third-party software. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Allakhazam would be rather hypocritical to ban us for hosting this.

We're creating this as an addon, in a format the game is designed to support. How is that any different from any other addon created for this game? Is Blizzard going to suddenly decide UI addons are against the terms of use (and from the part you quoted above, it sounds like they could rule that way if they wanted), and ban anyone using them?
#941 Aug 30 2005 at 11:18 AM Rating: Default
Hehe, reading the terms of use just makes it seem more and more unreasonable.

Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
F. The use of any "user interface" other than the user interface that is included in the World of Warcraft Software ("Third Party User Interface") is not recommended by Blizzard Entertainment, and you hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless Blizzard Entertainment from all claims, damages, and other losses which may arise from your use of a Third Party User Interface. At such time that Blizzard elects to post a list of approved Third-Party User Interfaces on its website, you agree that you will use only those Third-Party User Interfaces approved by Blizzard, and that you will use no other Third-Party User Interfaces in connection with World of Warcraft.


So, in other words, if they decided to post a "list of approved Third-Party User Interfaces" on their website, it would suddenly become agains the terms of use to use anything else, including Allakhazam's Wowreader (if it wasn't on the list), and any of the other hundreds of ones out there that people use on a very regular basis. If you read the wording, they wouldn't even have to notify the players using them that such a list had been posted, they could just post it and then start banning anyone using anything else.

Oh, also, I read those other sections over again.

Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
A. Blizzard Entertainment expressly reserves the exclusive right to create derivative works based on World of Warcraft. This means that you may not create derivative works based on World of Warcraft, without the prior express, written permission of Blizzard Entertainment.


"Derivative works" would be an entirely different game. We're not even coming close. We're just adding files to the directory that already exists. A "derivative work" would be if someone decided to release a "World of Nudecraft" or something, and although I think I saw one person here doing that, no one else really talked to or supported him, and it's not what we're trying to do.

Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
B. Only Blizzard Entertainment or its licensees have the right to host World of Warcraft! Accordingly, you may not host, provide matchmaking services for, or intercept, emulate or redirect the communication protocols used by Blizzard Entertainment as part of World of Warcraft, regardless of the method used to do so. Such prohibited methods may include, but are not limited to, protocol emulation, reverse engineering, modifying World of Warcraft, adding components to World of Warcraft, or using a utility program to host World of Warcraft.


Again, this is not something we're doing here. I think that one person (I'd have to go back and check for his name, but he was the only one downloading files to add them to a seperate release) might have been hosting the game himself, but the rest of us just want the game to look a little different, but continue to be hosted by Blizzard. None of the rest of us are planning to "host, provide matchmaking services for, or intercept, emulate or redirect the communication protocols used by Blizzard Entertainment as part of World of Warcraft" and everything else listed there are simply "methods to do so."

Blizzard's WoW Terms of use wrote:
C. You agree that you will not (i) modify or cause to be modified any files that are a part of a World of Warcraft installation; (ii) create or use cheats, "mods", and/or hacks, or any other third-party software designed to modify the World of Warcraft experience; (iii) use any third-party software that intercepts, "mines", or otherwise collects information from or through World of Warcraft; or (iv) allows players who are playing characters aligned with the "Alliance" faction to chat or otherwise communicate directly with players who are playing characters aligned with the "Horde" faction, or vice versa. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may update World of Warcraft with authorized patches and updates distributed by Blizzard, and use authorized Third Party User Interfaces as set forth in Section 13(f), below.


This is the only part of the Terms of use you could make an argument about us violating. We are not doing (i), since our patches do not modify any files that are part of the installation, they simply add files into the directory. It could be argued that we are doing (ii), but it could also be argued that every single UI mod violates this. We are definately not doing (iii) or (iv), and I don't think I even need to go into further explination there. So all you really had to quote was C(ii), since that's the only section it could be argued we are violating.

Now, how about the part that says, "you may . . . use authorized Third Party User Interfaces as set forth in Section 13(f), below." Section 13(f) (the one I've quoted above) only seems to say what risks you take (". . . hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless Blizzard Entertainment from all claims, damages, and other losses which may arise from your use of a Third Party User Interface.") in using them, as well as what limits they might set forth in the future ("At such time that Blizzard elects to post a list of approved Third-Party User Interfaces on its website, you agree that you will use only those Third-Party User Interfaces approved by Blizzard. . .") but not what the current definition of a "Third-Party User Interface" is. It doesn't define it anywhere else in the document that I can see. We already know what Third-Party means (that someone other than Blizzard created it) but what about User Interface? A quick Google search pulls up the following definition (from http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&start=0&oi=define&q=http://www.azatiko.com/glossary/u.php ) "A computer science term, interface is the point of communication between the computer and any other entity. User Interface, or UI, narrows that definition down to the communication between the computer and a human being."

Now, how do computers communicate with us? With visuals on the monitor and sound from the speakers. So isn't anything the computer shows us on the monitor considered part of UI? How are our mods any different from, say, Titan Panel? Or Cosmos? If anything, these mods give someone much more of an advantage than anything we're cooking up here. Blizzard always seems pretty bent on eliminating player advantages gained from outside sources, but no advantage is gained from our mods. If someone were to alter it so all of the opposing faction appeared to be 20 times larger than they are, yes, that would be a problem. But making other players appear nude? It's just silly to ban someone for that.
#942 Aug 30 2005 at 11:24 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,826 posts
Since this thread is already near the top, I don't consider this keeping it bumped.

Can anyone make a Hello Kitty skin?
#943 Aug 30 2005 at 2:49 PM Rating: Excellent
As if this thread couldn't get any more creepier and pathetic Sahn had to go bring it down to a whole new low.
#944 Aug 30 2005 at 2:51 PM Rating: Default
this is such a stupid thread.....
#945 Aug 30 2005 at 3:00 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,826 posts
Lenonis the Braindead wrote:
As if this thread couldn't get any more creepier and pathetic Sahn had to go bring it down to a whole new low.


You obviously missed the other thread where we were making a joke.

This thread is a joke, and I was in no way serious. These people can make new skins and stuff, but can't make there own forum/journal to post about it in.

Seriously, I'm tired of this clogging up the main page.

EDIT: Other Thread, since you missed it: http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=21&mid=112541728828435177&num=14

Edited, Tue Aug 30 16:08:12 2005 by Chubbycox
#946 Aug 30 2005 at 3:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Chubby!

You missed my sarcasm.

BAD CHUBBY.

If it was Lamneth asking for a hello kitty skin I might believe it, but I knew it was a joke coming from you.

I was just taking the opportunity to flame everyone else going "OMG I WANT MY CHARACTER TO HAVE BOOBIES"

#947 Aug 30 2005 at 3:06 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Why not just hijak this thread totally?

Im sure it will die once we get the banana in here.

Oh and Len, I want my MALE priest to have boobies.... He gets lonely when hes grinding and could use some entertainment :)

Edited, Tue Aug 30 16:15:51 2005 by KTurner
#948 Aug 30 2005 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
****
8,832 posts
Did someone call? Smiley: grin
#949 Aug 30 2005 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
KTurner the Braindead wrote:
Why not just hijak this thread totally?

Im sure it will die once we get the banana in here.
I think most people would rather just see it gone. It's long enough that people will eventually get it back on topic. If nothing else it would be nice to see it locked.
#950 Aug 30 2005 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,826 posts
Yes, I did miss it.

The anger of 900+ posts about 'can you add pubic hair and an *******' and 'can the nipples be bigger cause my hard on got in the way' blinded me.

I like how at points that Zetan dude bumps the post multiple times to reply. gg Zetan.

I might be able to stand it if they at least had memberships.

But then again, that would give them a journal, where they could go and make as many threads as they wanted on "NE bewbs" and never be bothered by us....

#951 Aug 30 2005 at 3:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,826 posts
Dark,

can we make this a sticky.....IN HELL!
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 291 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (291)