TavisBurdun wrote:
Don't remember the link, but I seen a video from another message board of a paladin beating a war. Both were lvl 60. War using a good 2h axe, paladin using bare hands. Took awhile, but the pld won. They had two more fights, one with the pld using a 1h mace and a shield, took less time, but still a little while. The last fight was pld using 2h mace and war still using axe. 3 second fight, paladin wins.
I'm sure you're mistaken, I've seen these video too and the Paladin DIDN'T win when fighting the Warrior barehanded, although the Warrior did have about 10% of his HP after the fight (the Warrior was using Dreadforge, 2 Handed Axe). The next fight, however, the Paladin used a weapon (1 handed something with a shield) and DID win with about 40% (could be 60%) MP left. The last fight (3 total) the Paladin used a 2 Handed Sword, don't remember name, and completely owned the Warrior with still 80%? MP intact.
These videos were, however, with a purpose of showing the Blizzard WoW team the inability of a Warrior against a Paladin (or anything but a Warlock) in a 1 on 1 duel, with hopes of more power being added to the Warrior class. These videos weren't shown to point out anything overpowered about the Paladin (I remember that's how the poster of the vids posted, could be wrong).
IMO though, Paladins are fine as they are now, nothing overpowered, nothing underpowered.
Edited, Sun Nov 28 18:25:45 2004 by Dkn