Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bwah, paladins.Follow

#1 Nov 28 2004 at 4:47 AM Rating: Default
On Durotan, the highest level toons are 25-30. Of those, there being about 30, less than 5 ARE NOT paladins. Anyone think they should get a little "un-buffing"?

I see many of you will say "play more". Most people that are level 15-25 have played a lot and the few non-paladins that are 25-30 have been playing since 12AM Tuesday, non stop.

Edited, Sun Nov 28 04:48:58 2004 by graynomas
#2 Nov 28 2004 at 4:55 AM Rating: Decent
**
264 posts
zOMG NERF!!!111eleven11
#3 Nov 28 2004 at 6:45 AM Rating: Decent
*
95 posts
Paladins have a wee bit easier time soloing. And being that group Exping is still hard at this stage because of the servers and all, it is obvious that the soloers would have the height right now. And yes i did use paladin in Open Beta as well as many other classes. I say dont worry bout it, once the game settles in youll see a bigger balance of high levels.

Edit* typo

Edited, Sun Nov 28 06:46:15 2004 by Eireann
#4 Nov 28 2004 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
keep these posts for the main boards many seem to agree with you there.
#5 Nov 28 2004 at 1:28 PM Rating: Default
I have to say i hate pld as since i am a hord hunter...

hunter have no way to win against a pld... even if we see them comeing...


any way, every thing will even out soon or later :D no biggy
#6 Nov 28 2004 at 2:32 PM Rating: Decent
Actually, 1 vs 1, it's very easy to defeat a paladin. Warrior have more combat oriented abilitys and when you say a spell coming pummel them to interrupt them. They really are not that powerful.
#7 Nov 28 2004 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Don't remember the link, but I seen a video from another message board of a paladin beating a war. Both were lvl 60. War using a good 2h axe, paladin using bare hands. Took awhile, but the pld won. They had two more fights, one with the pld using a 1h mace and a shield, took less time, but still a little while. The last fight was pld using 2h mace and war still using axe. 3 second fight, paladin wins.
#8 Nov 28 2004 at 4:59 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
a spell coming pummel them to interrupt them



that is removed from war... unless you use 1hand weapon and sheld... (and i think that is usless in pvp)
#9 Nov 28 2004 at 6:18 PM Rating: Decent
TavisBurdun wrote:
Don't remember the link, but I seen a video from another message board of a paladin beating a war. Both were lvl 60. War using a good 2h axe, paladin using bare hands. Took awhile, but the pld won. They had two more fights, one with the pld using a 1h mace and a shield, took less time, but still a little while. The last fight was pld using 2h mace and war still using axe. 3 second fight, paladin wins.


I'm sure you're mistaken, I've seen these video too and the Paladin DIDN'T win when fighting the Warrior barehanded, although the Warrior did have about 10% of his HP after the fight (the Warrior was using Dreadforge, 2 Handed Axe). The next fight, however, the Paladin used a weapon (1 handed something with a shield) and DID win with about 40% (could be 60%) MP left. The last fight (3 total) the Paladin used a 2 Handed Sword, don't remember name, and completely owned the Warrior with still 80%? MP intact.

These videos were, however, with a purpose of showing the Blizzard WoW team the inability of a Warrior against a Paladin (or anything but a Warlock) in a 1 on 1 duel, with hopes of more power being added to the Warrior class. These videos weren't shown to point out anything overpowered about the Paladin (I remember that's how the poster of the vids posted, could be wrong).

IMO though, Paladins are fine as they are now, nothing overpowered, nothing underpowered.

Edited, Sun Nov 28 18:25:45 2004 by Dkn
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 295 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (295)