Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Shaman vs. DruidFollow

#1 Nov 22 2004 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
Hi folks.

I waited too long to sign up for open beta, so I didn't get a chance to compare the 2 classes.

If someone could please provide a detailed comparison of the 2 classes, that would be very helpfull in my class choice.

I have always been a hybrid fan, but I also have always leaned towards the melee based hybrid but I don't plan on playing the Pally.

A couple of questions I do have are: Do shaman do more melee damage compared to druid even in cat form?

Also, when grouped is the shaman participating in melee along with totems and other beneficial spells or do they tend to sit back cast and watch? The same for druids?

Thanks


#2 Nov 22 2004 at 5:17 PM Rating: Good
**
264 posts
I'm not positive about druids, but Shamans probably melee/cast a little. The totems are decent at low levels, but at higher levels most of the totems are nearly useless.
#3 Nov 22 2004 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good

Druid: http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/druid.html

Shaman: http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/classes/shaman.html


That's all the information you could ever want. :) If you read all of that and still have questions, be sure to let me know. :)
#4 Nov 22 2004 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
*
160 posts
One difference is there are no Alliance Shaman, you have to go Horde if you want to be one.

Some beta people thought Shaman was the best thing since sliced bread and hated Druids. Shaman need to use the proper totems in the proper instances.

Anyway, I love Druids and will be playing a Night Elf Druid myself. Shapeshifting is cool and lends a whole new aspect to the hack/slash play that most other classes have.
#5 Nov 22 2004 at 5:31 PM Rating: Good
I have read alot on both of these. Played a shaman to 12 and druid to 20 in beta.

Shaman- very very very powerful right now. Get travel form early (20), rez at 12, ok heals. Good melee though buffs and that guy who says totems suck at high levels is insane. You can have up to 4 totems down at a time (one per element) and this gives the class alot of variety. They also get mail at 40 and can use a shield from lvl 1. This gives them much better tanking ability than druids even relative to druid bear form. They can also use talents to spec in melee skills to block/parry/flurry more. THey get a fair number of insta cast DD's that include spell interrupts on timers that are really nice. Very strong and versatile class.

Druid- druid get better buffs and heals than shaman but you have to be in druid form to use them. Most high level druids complained that the forms were basically worthless at high levels as you do more DPS using a staff and spells in druid form than cat and bear form can't tank worth a crap due to no shield and no parry. So you are kind of stuck being a druid form druid in groups which means you are a weak priest. The overwhelming majority of people think druids need some work on the forms to make them worth using in groups.

Personally I love and will be playing both. Right now the shaman is considered more powerful but that is subject to change.

#6 Nov 22 2004 at 5:36 PM Rating: Good
I have read the class descripions on the WoW page and other random websites. It answers most of my questions, but I was trying to get a little gameplay info from a beta player. Thank you for suggesting though.

I was trying to get a little insight how the average gameplay of the class' are.

For instance, while grouping, what are the more common roles of the 2 class' from what you folks noticed in beta?

With a combination of spells and melee, which class tends to have higher dps and/or melee better? From what I have read, it seems shaman melee better but I have not seen much about the cat form for druid and its melee potential.
#7 Nov 22 2004 at 5:38 PM Rating: Good
**
264 posts
I haven't grouped much with Druids, but with Shamans they melee and heal mostly.
#8 Nov 22 2004 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
*
128 posts
My view of Druid and Shaman is that both Druid and shaman can do pretty much everything, but Druid can do everything better than Shaman, heal, damage, tank. The catch is, Druid can only do one thing at a time, tank in bear form, heal in biped form, deal damage in cat form, and can't do all three at once like a shaman.

Dunno, that's the way I see it, I could be -totally- wrong, since my view is that of a relatively low lvl - didn't get that high in beta.

EDIT - Yeah, ***** that, I am totally wrong.

Edited, Mon Nov 22 17:42:46 2004 by Cheesybeef
#9 Nov 22 2004 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
*
160 posts
BTW, you can use Talent's to steer your Druid into mostly caster, healing or melee.

I'm more of a caster Druid myself.
#10 Nov 22 2004 at 5:46 PM Rating: Good
****
6,678 posts
Shamans are better melee/tanks than druids.
Shamans are possibly better nukers than druids.
They are about equal when it comes to healing, all things considered.

IMHO, shamans are over-powered and druids are under-powered, but some people feel differently.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#11 Nov 22 2004 at 5:48 PM Rating: Good
***
1,124 posts
quote:

I haven't grouped much with Druids, but with Shamans they melee and heal mostly.

----------------------------------------------------

heal bah i rarely heal, im more melee and magic, if i actually had to heal some one it was because he was getting the royal one.

As it seems there will be many viarities of shammans, battle shammans, healer shammies and magic shammies ect.
#12 Nov 22 2004 at 5:56 PM Rating: Good
On the old beta boards someone actually parsed their cat form damage and their druid form damage.. and druid form was higher DPS. That is the reason people don't talk much about cat form DPS.

What druids need (from a consensus of many druids)

1) More armor in bear form and/or shields
2) Cat form needs a finisher that is a DD not a DOT
3) Form damage needs to scale up or their needs to be items that scale up the form damage
4) Ability to shift directly from cat to bear and not have to be a druid in the middle.
5) Lower shifting cost so it doesn't chew up all your mana.

#13 Nov 22 2004 at 6:09 PM Rating: Good
18 posts
"Shamans are better melee/tanks than druids.
Shamans are possibly better nukers than druids.
They are about equal when it comes to healing, all things considered.

IMHO, shamans are over-powered and druids are under-powered, but some people feel differently."

For anyone who played with level 55 players and above, you would know the above to be false.

By definition, Druids are tanks, Shaman are not. At high levels Druid Bear form is considered an equal counterpart to the warrior class with the addition of having the ability to heal.

Shaman do not melee well mainly because by definition melee means you fight in front of someone. Druid and Shaman melee in normal form equally because both get mail at level 40, and both usually use staves, daggers, or maces.

Shaman are a much more ranged combat class, but in general shaman are not a melee class, nor a tank class. Shaman are as known, a jack-of-all trades. They can do a bit of everything and the reason people call them 'over-powered' is because they CAN do everything. But the thing is, shaman dont do one specific thing really well. They just do everything okay. They aren't amazing tanks, they aren't the best healers, they don't pull well, and they have very limited buff options.

Druids are supposed to be the more powerful hybrid healing class but in reality most of their extra healing powers require them to focus on the healing which eliminates them as being healers in combat, and makes them a tank by default.

In reality shaman and druids heal equally but the shaman have the upper hand in healing with the power to ressurect not only other players but themselves, an ability not even the priests have.

Overall, it depends on what you want to do. If you want to tank and at the same time be a hybrid then go druid, but groups will only want you to tank for them.

If you want multiple options of being a secondary tank, a puller and a healer, plus the wonderful credit you get if you manage to ressurect the whole team if they all die in a dungeon, thus giving them a second chance, then by all means go shaman.

To anyone who whines about shaman beiong overpowered, I advise you to put a shaman up against any class in a group battle or a 1 v 1, if the person playing the opposing class knows how to play the class well (e.g. mage being a ranged fighter, or a warrior meleeing only and now allowing the shaman to get away) they will almost always win, because the shaman do not excell at anything, they are just good at everything.

Kahrain
#14 Nov 22 2004 at 6:21 PM Rating: Good
18 posts
/bump

Can I get a set?
#15 Nov 22 2004 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good

Quote:
Quote:
"Shamans are better melee/tanks than druids.
Shamans are possibly better nukers than druids.
They are about equal when it comes to healing, all things considered.

IMHO, shamans are over-powered and druids are under-powered, but some people feel differently."


For anyone who played with level 55 players and above, you would know the above to be false.



no he is right... shaman is better class...


Quote:
By definition, Druids are tanks, Shaman are not. At high levels Druid Bear form is considered an equal counterpart to the warrior class with the addition of having the ability to heal.



druids are tanks only at low level... they only get leather armor... shaman get mail armor at 40... and no bear form is no where close to war... that is compareing paper to a rock...

druids are little gimped... (ok alot)



Quote:
Shaman do not melee well mainly because by definition melee means you fight in front of someone. Druid and Shaman melee in normal form equally because both get mail at level 40, and both usually use staves, daggers, or maces.



shaman is only caster class (not counting pld, he is more of a melee class) to do lot of damage in melee.

even in cat form, druid melee sucks... shaman melee with fire/eath/wind (wind does most) or what not weapon buff = lot of damage!

...at level 40 shaman get mail... druid do NOT!


Quote:
Shaman are a much more ranged combat class, but in general shaman are not a melee class, nor a tank class. Shaman are as known, a jack-of-all trades. They can do a bit of everything and the reason people call them 'over-powered' is because they CAN do everything. But the thing is, shaman dont do one specific thing really well. They just do everything okay. They aren't amazing tanks, they aren't the best healers, they don't pull well, and they have very limited buff options.



...did you even played shaman class?




Quote:
Druids are supposed to be the more powerful hybrid healing class but in reality most of their extra healing powers require them to focus on the healing which eliminates them as being healers in combat, and makes them a tank by default.



...did you play the same game as us?



Quote:
Overall, it depends on what you want to do. If you want to tank and at the same time be a hybrid then go druid, but groups will only want you to tank for them.



...once more... druid was tank at the low, low level....


Quote:
If you want multiple options of being a secondary tank, a puller and a healer, plus the wonderful credit you get if you manage to ressurect the whole team if they all die in a dungeon, thus giving them a second chance, then by all means go shaman.




....where is your info coming from? druid spell like intange is usless indoor but shaman can use all of it's skill!




Quote:
To anyone who whines about shaman beiong overpowered, I advise you to put a shaman up against any class in a group battle or a 1 v 1, if the person playing the opposing class knows how to play the class well (e.g. mage being a ranged fighter, or a warrior meleeing only and now allowing the shaman to get away) they will almost always win, because the shaman do not excell at anything, they are just good at everything.




last time I pvp, shaman win most of the fight... and if i was going to lose i ran...

50% slow eath ward with no cool time = never die shaman


...sorry but did you played as shaman? or druid?
#16 Nov 22 2004 at 6:42 PM Rating: Decent
18 posts
I played a Shaman to level 34, and a Druid to level 29.

My big mistake saying druid can wear mail, that was a huge error on my part.

Except you didn't answer the poor mans question, but I can easily assume you were telling him shaman own the druids.

It's true. :D

And as far as the lat paragraph. I can quote 90% of that from people on the WoW forums and Vault that are level 60 shaman's. I'm sure the shamans that killed you in pvp were of much higher level or just purge nuke nuke nuke earth shock, lightning shield, whack whack whack, heal, and continue on.
#17 Nov 22 2004 at 6:45 PM Rating: Decent
"By definition, Druids are tanks, Shaman are not. At high levels Druid Bear form is considered an equal counterpart to the warrior class with the addition of having the ability to heal. "

Druids have never been defined as tanks! Where the hell did you get that from? Especially after the last patches, the druid in bear form (which cannot be seen as default) is far behind a warrior. Sure he can heal, but not while tanking.

"Shaman do not melee well mainly because by definition melee means you fight in front of someone. Druid and Shaman melee in normal form equally because both get mail at level 40, and both usually use staves, daggers, or maces. "

That is totally wrong. Druids get NEVER mail, only leather for the whole career (do you know that leather has even been nerfed lately?). In addition to mail armor, as mentioned from someone else before, shamans get shields, so they can take a lot more hits in biped form.

"Shaman are as known, a jack-of-all trades."

That is the same old story everyone is assuming for the druid. And THAT could may be a defintion for them both.

"Druids are supposed to be the more powerful hybrid healing class but in reality most of their extra healing powers require them to focus on the healing which eliminates them as being healers in combat, and makes them a tank by default. "

If you cannot heal with numbercrunched maxpower it doesnt make you a tank!

"Overall, it depends on what you want to do. If you want to tank and at the same time be a hybrid then go druid, but groups will only want you to tank for them."

Since druid is even more "jack-of-all trades" than shaman, you should not forget his caster (nuke) and rogue (cat) abilities.
(I dont want to start the low DPS whining here, just mentioning the real possibilities)

"To anyone who whines about shaman beiong overpowered, I advise you to put a shaman up against any class in a group battle or a 1 v 1, ... "

Please dont start comparing classes in PvP and PvE mode together.


-0.02$
Sif


Ed.: Just saw the earlier response similar to mine :-)


Edited, Mon Nov 22 18:50:44 2004 by GreatSif
#18 Nov 22 2004 at 6:46 PM Rating: Decent
40 posts
/agree, if you spent even a minute reading th edruid forums when OB was still up youd know how bad they have it, at best, even if they spec restoration, there only half a healer, there tanking abilities as stated above r less then adiquate, and there dps as a cat is like a rogue using no weapon.

I was bored one day, and went to Thottbot, i checked the highest armor for a druid not using the staff that adds 260 armor. The highest i found was around 1660, no with bear form, it adds 125% of that when u shift into it, so your at around 3500, and if you spec feral, you can jack it up to a maybe 3800, now compare thaqt to ne war lvl 60, and they have 5k ATLEAST.

Now if you still say a druid is an equal tank, u r delirious, or on some drug. They r about 75%-80% of a healer, caster, tank, and dps, but overal they are very underpowered.

Comparing a druid to a shaman is like say, hey c that broken down car with one headlight, and 3 tires, i bet it can beat that escalade if they went head to head, and off-road.
#19 Nov 22 2004 at 6:49 PM Rating: Default
thank you GreatSif :D
you are 100% on the same page as me :D

and for...

Quote:
And as far as the lat paragraph. I can quote 90% of that from people on the WoW forums and Vault that are level 60 shaman's. I'm sure the shamans that killed you in pvp were of much higher level or just purge nuke nuke nuke earth shock, lightning shield, whack whack whack, heal, and continue on.


shaman why they are good at pvp

1) spell interuption with cool down of 6 s...

2) melee damage is good.

3) can have 1 ward of each... at any given time...

4) use slow 50% and run and kit the person if you have to! but you will never get killed with no cool down earth ward....

5) ask ppl in this forum ans ask them "do shaman suck at pvp?"
and come back here :D

#20 Nov 22 2004 at 6:50 PM Rating: Decent
LOL. NVM. The above posters pretty much covered it. ^^


Edited, Mon Nov 22 18:52:15 2004 by Palison

Edited, Mon Nov 22 18:55:01 2004 by Palison
#21 Nov 22 2004 at 6:50 PM Rating: Decent
18 posts
If this is directed at me I defintaely agreed that druids aren't perfect and could use some tweaking.

I play a shaman, I only argue that shaman aren't as godly as people claim.

I just dont want to see them nerf the shaman.
#22 Nov 22 2004 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
**
397 posts
Umm, a shaman is NOT the equal of a druid in healing. Its heals are far less mana efficient, and do less total healing. Shaman's 1 advantage in healing is a good 1.5s heal. Overall I'd take a priest or druid as a healer before I took a shaman. Shamans should be used for their damage and versatility, not for their healing power.
#23 Nov 22 2004 at 6:52 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Vermon's grammer may not be all that, but his points are way more accurate than yours.




sorry my english is never been good... korean collage student...

-_-;;
#24 Nov 22 2004 at 6:56 PM Rating: Decent
*
71 posts
"By definition, Druids are tanks, Shaman are not. At high levels Druid Bear form is considered an equal counterpart to the warrior class with the addition of having the ability to heal."

no. wrong. actually, the dire bear form only helps with some catch-up (b/c at about 40 your lvl 10 form is seriously lagging behind its parent class), and is in no way comparable to a warrior of a similar level. remember, at 40 shamans get a large armor boost w/ mail, and warriors get an even better boost w/ plate. in fact, the dire form was regarded by most druids throughout the cb as mostly worthless. remember to that that awesome armor increase we see in bear form is often less than the amount of armor granted by shields; so at lvl 60, your bear form is giving you the armor of your warrior's shield... not to mention that plate armor good old warrior's slapped on.

"If you want to tank and at the same time be a hybrid then go druid, but groups will only want you to tank for them. "

wrong. groups will always want you for the buffs (motw is, as we all know, touted as "the best buff in the game") and as a healer/melee class (healer first). part of the appeal of a druid is that, more so than with a priest, they can take care of themselves if aggroed, but not that they can draw and hold aggro constantly, or even take on multiple mobs as a tank and then hold that hate while they're being healed. moonfire is always appreciated, and when outside an instance, as is your roots. most druids will tell you that you enjoy only a short window in which you can tank anywhere near efficiently as a pally or war.

"Druids are supposed to be the more powerful hybrid healing class but in reality most of their extra healing powers require them to focus on the healing which eliminates them as being healers in combat, and makes them a tank by default."

i disagree. regrowth and healing touch are, raw and un-modded, really powerful heals. if you take regrowths insta heal and its heal over time, then you wind up with a really serious healing spell.

"ressurect the whole team if they all die in a dungeon, thus giving them a second chance"

here's where the druid v. shaman argument is weak: shamans are a mix between palladins (like with ancestral spirit rezzing and all) and something rather like druids. they aren't druids, and they aren't the "horde palladin." so no, a druid can only rez one person at a go, but that's because the alliance already has a palladin to be a tank/rezzer, if needed, and the horde has the shaman.


"Shaman are a much more ranged combat class, but in general shaman are not a melee class, nor a tank class. Shaman are as known, a jack-of-all trades. They can do a bit of everything and the reason people call them 'over-powered' is because they CAN do everything. But the thing is, shaman dont do one specific thing really well. They just do everything okay. They aren't amazing tanks, they aren't the best healers, they don't pull well, and they have very limited buff options."

except that a shamn does more melee dps at high levels than a druid, b/c the druid is staying clear of their forms (which do less dps). and shaman have better armore at high levels than the caster druid (mail v. leather). this last part sounds almost like you could replace shaman with druid and get what everybody is saying about druids (and in my experience druids are just what these people say they are: mediocre at everything). granted, druids have a better buff than shaman, and have some nice pulls like moonfire and faerie fire. but even then, that's barely an edge on the shaman.

generally people draw with a shaman because the shammy has a really nice getaway trick by lvl 20: earth totems + spirit wolf. people loose against a shammy, especially a tauren shammy, because imh experience, a shammy is generally doing greater dps than a druid and other casters or caster hybrids... they do damage comparable to, but not the same as, a pally... a lot of people were still underestimating the shaman by the end of ob. also... another reason people loose frequently to a shaman is cause the wolf form is not only fast, but consistantly fast (unlike dash, or flee or whatever) so that the shammy can hunt you down.

i actually think the two classes are pretty even until lvl 40, though.


EDIT: clarit, contradicted myself cause in the frenzy of typing, i mis-edited.

Edited, Mon Nov 22 19:13:22 2004 by sheapearce
#25 Nov 22 2004 at 8:18 PM Rating: Default
for now, over all shaman > druid...

but don't forget that this is mmorpg and :D all the class will be balanced sooner or later...

look at war :D it was great vs casters with pummle :D but that is gone :D

and war used to be able to charge in battle :D and it was sooo good!!!!! :D

but now it's all changed for good :D

if you like druid play that class :D don't worry about it's dps, skill or what not... play it for your enjoyment

have fun with it :D

#26 Nov 22 2004 at 8:21 PM Rating: Default
Quit posting the same crap. A SHAMAN is much better at EVERYTHING in this game than any Druid any day. LMAO who said a Druid is a tank? I play on PvP server and they are ALWAYS the first to fall. I ran solo to lvl 32 and by no means did I get a chance to play the highend game yet, but I can tell you I know a few peeps who have that were Shaman and were very rarely beat BY ANYONE. A Shaman is a very powerfull class handsdown. I think we will probly get the shaft soon when all the kids start getting OWNT in release by Shamans in PvP. And to the poster who said in the highend game that totems are useless? wtf are u an Alliance member or have you ever played this game? Totems are the bloodline of a Shaman and any member in his party at ANY lvl would be thrilled to have them on the ground during battle you can betcha ballz on that one. Shamans can Tank, they can heal,they can nuke, they can dot,they can buff(totems) they can pull agro, they do have high dps when geared right. Just ask the 37 pally I ran into =P. Anyways choose what your gonna have fun with but know that if you do play a Shaman on a PvP server your head will have a huge pricetag on it at any battle. You will be targeted first every time I know I was.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 349 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (349)