Ok, I have some more info.
Not transcripts, as I requested. These have been redacted by SE, which I think was not agreed by the ICO. This is my original request to SE:
Quote:
I write to you to request information held about myself, which I am entitled to under Section 7(1) of The Data Protection Act 1998. The information I would like to have is as follows:
- Transcript of the online conversation with a member of your staff, who referred to their self as GM Negpeg, dated 28th July 2009.
- Details of any warnings placed against my account since creation and any decisions made against my account resulting from these.
I did not get the transcript, as they've redacted it. I'm not sure this was agreed by the ICO, so I'll call them Monday. I did get details about my account though, including that I have two warnings for "harassment". Quotes below:
Quote:
28-01-2006 - GM queue received numerous calls about Taiko using grief tactics to not allow other parties to gain experience. GM arrived in zone and observed Taiko monopolizing every mob in the area by casting spells on each so when another group of players attacked and killed a mob it would not award them experience. GM jailed Taiko and was only going to issue a caution, but Taiko was argumentative and refused to accept responsibility and so was given an official warning.
Quote:
09-11-2007 - Taiko was reported for harassment by several people for making a joke about a tragedy. GM reviewed logs and found evidence of the harassment. GM sent player to jail 6. GM informed player of their harassment violation and issued a Warning for Harassment.
Quote:
Date withheld by SE - Taiko was reported for harassment by {REDACTION}. EUGM reviewed logs and found evidence of the harassment. GM sent player to jail 12 and informed of their harassment violation.
There's no transcripts of my discussion as requested. I'll speak to the ICO about these. However, a few points:
- As far as I'm aware, -ga nuking is not illegal. Nor is it when you arrived somewhere and it was empty, then had a group arrive after. That's what the top quote seems to relate to, and there were plenty of mobs around if my memory is correct.
- SE have not provided evidence of harassment for the second quote. If I've harassed someone, it would've had to have gone over a period of time. The way they're wording it makes it sound as if it's one comment, meant as a joke. The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 states:
Quote:
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—.
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and.
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other..
Therefore, if it is just one line that attracted multiple complaints, the legal definition would not amount to harassment. For those in the UK, think along the lines of a Frankie Boyle style joke. It might be controversial, but it's not harassment.
- Why were they able to provide me with dates for the first two, but not for the final one? Something to hide there.
Harassment also is a pretty big accusation to make if not substantiated.