Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Startling Late Breaking News...Live from AllakhazamFollow

#52 May 07 2004 at 5:57 PM Rating: Default
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
Dude Im not arguing with you..... I said I deserve it. Nor did I say ANYWHERE that you were accusing anyone unjustly. I'm sure you think you are justified.



And no this thread was not intended to bait you. It was here to show the absurdity of comparing us to terrorists. However I do find it amusing that you are arrogant enough to think everything is directed at you. I also think its funny you came in with such animosity towards me.

Edited, Fri May 7 18:52:36 2004 by spawned


This is the last time I'm going to explain this. I posted a definition of what terrorism technically is, and what exactly it was that you (not you personally, but the plural you, referring to the people who bombed Ace's karma in an attempt to control him) were doing. It is the same *type* of action done for the same general purpose. But it is not terrorism in the sense of blowing up cars and buses. And that's my point; to attempt terrorism on such a small, pathetic level as karma bombing is sad, and I honestly think that the people involved need help. They obviously take this forum too seriously.
#53 May 07 2004 at 5:59 PM Rating: Default
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
This thread was dead until you picked it up. Which I have to assume means you went looking for a fight.


Oh please. You started this thread after CrimsonMagician asked someone to come up with a way to "get back at" the main forum, who apparently you all share a common disdain for.
#54 May 07 2004 at 6:00 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,674 posts
Asako wrote:
Stuff about the definition of Terrorism.


And how, Asako, does this legitimately rationalize your behavior of nuking this whole thread out of spite, down to practically every last post, despite how most of them weren't even about you, or the "terrorism" word scenario, or anything of that sort?
#55 May 07 2004 at 6:01 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
And I dont want to explain to you (because we can all see you are simply blinded by hate) that Lady was trying to rectify a problem.....Should she have done it? It's not my place to say. Her intent was not malicious, or terrorist in nature. Grow up. Move on. And get some councelling for this anger problem.
#56 May 07 2004 at 6:02 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
It was a joke. Obviously we can see who now is the stalker. That was written in a journal where you never post. Please just go away. Nobody cared about this thread except for the people joking around. It fell low and was going to go away just like spawned said. Oh, and behold the Olsen twins.

Edited, Fri May 7 19:02:50 2004 by CrimsonMagician
#57 May 07 2004 at 6:02 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
Asako wrote:
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
This thread was dead until you picked it up. Which I have to assume means you went looking for a fight.


Oh please. You started this thread after CrimsonMagician asked someone to come up with a way to "get back at" the main forum, who apparently you all share a common disdain for.


today this thread was dead.... you bumped it from page 2......
#58 May 07 2004 at 6:05 PM Rating: Default
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
And I dont want to explain to you (because we can all see you are simply blinded by hate) that Lady was trying to rectify a problem.....Should she have done it? It's not my place to say. Her intent was not malicious, or terrorist in nature. Grow up. Move on. And get some councelling for this anger problem.

Terrorists are not malicious in nature. Most tend to believe that their actions are completely justified by the actions of the group/ideology that they oppose. And tell me, what shows more blinding hate? Rebuking someone for doing something wrong (which is what I did), or starting a thread simply to regurgitate an argument that had long since ended? I responded to this thread when I found it, the same day that the last post had been posted. You started this thread based on another thread that hasn't been posted in since Thursday. You extended the life of this ridiculous hostility, not me.
#59 May 07 2004 at 6:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
you guys are not getting the whole concept of the OOt forum thing real well today... Oh well, we'll jsut move it when post moving is done.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#60 May 07 2004 at 6:07 PM Rating: Default
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
Asako wrote:
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
This thread was dead until you picked it up. Which I have to assume means you went looking for a fight.


Oh please. You started this thread after CrimsonMagician asked someone to come up with a way to "get back at" the main forum, who apparently you all share a common disdain for.


today this thread was dead.... you bumped it from page 2......


Page 2 isn't dead. And it was hardly down the list of page 2, at that. You brought back a topic from page 3, which is considerably more dead.
#61 May 07 2004 at 6:07 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
I put up this thread to be funny.... and if you care to peep in the journal we all write in... you'll see I didnt care about my Karma to begin with.
#62 May 07 2004 at 6:08 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
Thanks Kao..... sorry about the trouble Smiley: grinSmiley: grinSmiley: grin

Edited, Fri May 7 19:08:49 2004 by spawned
#63 May 07 2004 at 6:09 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Hmm. That avatar really fits for dread lord. As soon as I saw it I was...dreading...something.
#64 May 07 2004 at 6:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
Asako wrote:


Page 2 isn't dead. And it was hardly down the list of page 2, at that. You brought back a topic from page 3, which is considerably more dead.



I started this thread the same time that was goin on...... It didnt get "brought back"
#65 May 07 2004 at 6:10 PM Rating: Default
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
I put up this thread to be funny.... and if you care to peep in the journal we all write in... you'll see I didnt care about my Karma to begin with.

I never said you cared about karma...though the fact that mine has dropped a good 5 points simply from, you know, being on this forum, tells me that you and your gang seem to care more than you say you do. Can't say I'm surprised...there are a good dozen of you at least, and one of me. I'm curious to see how long it'll take you to "bomb" me back to 1 or something in your little petty revenge.
#66 May 07 2004 at 6:11 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
Check with the admins I havent touched your karma......
#67 May 07 2004 at 6:12 PM Rating: Decent
Dread Lord Kaolian wrote:
you guys are not getting the whole concept of the OOt forum thing real well today... Oh well, we'll jsut move it when post moving is done.

Why not move it yesterday? It was clearly off-topic for a FFXI forum.

Edited, Fri May 7 19:11:54 2004 by Asako
#68 May 07 2004 at 6:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,674 posts
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
Check with the admins I havent touched your karma......


I touched a few of them with "Decent" ... not all, but a few. I'll admit it. Reason being that he went and attacked just about every last post he saw when he responded to this thread for the first time, regardless of what was in the post.

Honestly, if someone is going to do that, simply because someone so much as posted in a thread, it's a good thing their rating is so low that they can't do it anymore.

Not like he'll respond to me, though. He seems pretty fixated on responding only to you.

Incidentally, I'm not a part of any "group of friends" or "gang" on this forum. Just someone trying to have fun, and who gets frustrated when people go and blindly attack a whole thread, blasting innocent people in the process, too.

Edited, Fri May 7 19:18:04 2004 by ResidentLune
#69 May 07 2004 at 6:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Asako, if you really want to get your karma back up to rate level, don't run around complaining about the people that rate you down. that will just make more people rate you down for complaining about karma. It's annoying, yes, and perhaps not fair, but your best option would really be to lay low for a while, then wait for your karma to move back up above 3.0.

From what I can see so far, you are not being karma camped, you are being single hit by alot of different people. Time for a change in strategy...
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#70 May 07 2004 at 6:18 PM Rating: Default
ResidentLune wrote:
spawned, Eater of Souls wrote:
Check with the admins I havent touched your karma......


I touched a few of them. I'll admit it. Reason being that he went and attacked just about every last post he saw when he responded to this thread for the first time, regardless of what was in the post.

Honestly, if someone is going to do that, simply because someone so much as posted in a thread, it's a good thing their rating is so low that they can't do it anymore.

Not like he'll respond to me, though. He seems pretty fixated on responding only to you.

Incidentally, I'm not a part of any "group of friends" or "gang" on this forum. Just someone trying to have fun, and who gets frustrated when people go and blindly attack a whole thread, blasting innocent people in the process, too.


You make assumptions about my actions, take your own actions against me in response, and then claim that you get "frustrated when people go and blindly attack"? With morals like your's, you could have a bright future in government. You claimed to dislike Lady's actions in downrating someone to what she thought they were "worthy" of, and then you do the same thing?

edit: I can see you've decided to cover yourself by claiming to have only rated my "decent". Nice to see that lying and duplicity can be added to hypocrisy in your case.

Edited, Fri May 7 19:19:48 2004 by Asako
#71 May 07 2004 at 6:19 PM Rating: Default
Dread Lord Kaolian wrote:
Asako, if you really want to get your karma back up to rate level, don't run around complaining about the people that rate you down. that will just make more people rate you down for complaining about karma. It's annoying, yes, and perhaps not fair, but your best option would really be to lay low for a while, then wait for your karma to move back up above 3.0.

From what I can see so far, you are not being karma camped, you are being single hit by alot of different people. Time for a change in strategy...


Right. A group of people who you know are friends, and allow to run this forum like it's their private fief, because they are friends of your's.
#72 May 07 2004 at 6:19 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
He downrated you because you're acting like an immature ***. Not because he thought your were "worthy".
#73 May 07 2004 at 6:20 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,458 posts
LOL Kao Have I EVER posted ANYTHING to you before?
#74 May 07 2004 at 6:20 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,674 posts
Asako wrote:
You make assumptions about my actions, take your own actions against me in response, and then claim that you get "frustrated when people go and blindly attack"? With morals like your's, you could have a bright future in government. You claimed to dislike Lady's actions in downrating someone to what she thought they were "worthy" of, and then you do the same thing?


Here's the difference. You more or less have eluded to being the one who did it to this thread in the first place.

As well, unlike the other scenario, this is a matter of your behavior -- which has been irrational and rude -- not like the other thread where it was a matter of rating someone solely on their post count to try and keep them in a certain rating bracket.

I'm sure someone such as yourself can see the difference between the two scenarios.
#75 May 07 2004 at 6:22 PM Rating: Default
ResidentLune wrote:
Asako wrote:
You make assumptions about my actions, take your own actions against me in response, and then claim that you get "frustrated when people go and blindly attack"? With morals like your's, you could have a bright future in government. You claimed to dislike Lady's actions in downrating someone to what she thought they were "worthy" of, and then you do the same thing?


Here's the difference. You more or less have eluded to being the one who did it to this thread in the first place.

As well, unlike the other scenario, this is a matter of your behavior -- which has been irrational and rude -- not like the other thread where it was a matter of rating someone solely on their post count to try and keep them in a certain rating bracket.

I'm sure someone such as yourself can see the difference between the two scenarios.


The word is "alluded", and I did no such thing. I rated posts that I felt were part of an attempt at "flamebaiting" in a forum where that sort of posting has no place.
#76 May 07 2004 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Quote:
I rated posts that I felt were part of an attempt at "flamebaiting" in a forum where that sort of posting has no place.


Ahh so you did downrate. Good thing you can keep your stories straight and correct people's spelling.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 323 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (323)