-.- now i know why ppl double post ... and i can't even edit caus it's anonymus lol

The Tokopekko Wildgrass can only be grown. You have to purchase the seeds that yield this item from an NPC in Aht Urhgan Whitegate. The Tokopekko Wildgrass is specifically asked for by the Chocobo raising NPC. However the Gausebit Wildgrass is dropped off mobs, but this is not the item requested by the Chocobo raising NPC. So next time you try to make other people look stupid make sure you're not making yourself look stupid first.

Its more than likely that it was because WoW does allow window-switching. It seems to me that it makes the the code less secure.

I'm studying software engineering at the graduate level and I can tell you that isn't true. Here is an everyday example that should help clarify: Many banks let you move real money around using a webpage, that you can view in many different browsers, over which the bank has little or no control. Not only can you alt-tab out of your browser, you could be running just about any plugin under the sun. Banks are pretty concerned with security, but they don't worry about this. Why is that?

The simple anwser is they aren't relying on your browser to behave. They check everything it sends to them and won't follow any instructions it sends them that don't make sense or shouldn't be allowed. They don't send any information to your browser that they don't actually want you to have. The bank is taking responsability for their own behavior and because of that places few burdens on the user's systems or the users themselves.

Now consider the alternative. In this scenario the bank wants to trust your computer, not double-check what your computer sends them. Now they must be very concerned that your computer is worthy of trust, it might be compromised (particularly by you) and they need to ensure that you're only running authorized code that has not been modified on trustworthy hardware. When their trusted client is compromised in some way (as it almost inevitably will be) it can be used to make the bank's computers do bad or crazy things. As soon as they want to trust you, they also need to control you.

FFXI and many other MMOs (including WOW, but at least they let you alt tab and configure the interface yourself) are currently living in the second scenario. Rather than take more responsability themselves, they put more and more effort into controlling client's computers. This creates a perpetual arms-race between users who want to control their own computers (or cheat) and software publishers who need to make ever-more-invasive clients to feel comfortable trusting them, increases the potential for abuse when a client is compromised, and creates an environment where users feel publishers don't trust them (and they don't, because they can't afford to).

Gameplay hacks like warp hacks, flee hacks, and TP viewing are possible only becuase, for whatever reason, SE wants them to be possible. None of the hacks I've read about give users undue control over SE severs so the game server always has the choice to act on a user's insructions, or not; to send them information, or not. If you don't want users to know party member's TP, don't send it to them. If you don't want users to be able to move quickly or instantly from place to place then don't just blindly follow thier instructions when they try to. From a security perspective it really is just that simple. I'll admit this increases the burden on SE's servers, but I higly doubt it would do so to a technically unfiesable level.