Just because I don't talk like a nineteenth-century millionaire, I'm an under-educated slob? You need to tone down your ego a bit, you condescending, arrogant @#%^.
In answer to your question Matjlav ~ Yes, that is correct you are an under-educated slob.
Lol, if that's what you intended. If not, I still lol'd.
The sheer stupidity of your original complaint endures. In essence:
You use big words and it's hard to reply!
Look, I can generalize your words too:
You're stupid. I'm smarter than you. I'm more educated, rich, and learnèd than thou art. Fear me, commoner, for I am the superior intelligence.
Welcome to my standard. You are not smart enough to talk to me, obviously. Move along. Conversationally incompatible, if you will. I have a vocabulary, and you say stupid things that make it impossible to take you seriously.
Wow, your arrogance never ceases to amaze me. But, something tells me you aren't the clever pundit you pose yourself as, but rather you sit in your room with a Charles ******* book open trying to find some clever little sayings so that you can make yourself sound smart... but, I don't really know.
****, you, in the same paragraph, admitted you didn't understand what I said and were at the same time offended by it.
But please, provoke on. I would love the opportunity to continue to frustrate your reading comprehension.
You certainly didn't in that last post. Step up your game, you're not frustrating your serfs as much as you think you are!