Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

ahaFollow

#52 Sep 17 2008 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
like in all EPIC FORUM BATTLEZ, it doesnt matter who wins cause theyre all losers.
#53 Sep 17 2008 at 11:05 PM Rating: Default
Jereth wrote:

Well, then you're a hypocrite too. Guilty by association. If you know we didn't follow the calendar, but you stayed with us anyway then you have ZERO right to come here and complain about us being so horrible for not using it. You're the joke here dude, and anyone with half a brain cell sees that. At least Lionze has the courage to put his face behind his beliefs (right or wrong), which is more than I can say for you.


Now...what if I'm not actually a member of StarsMaker at all? What if I just played you like a cheap violin, making you jump through proverbial hoops in an attempt to figure out who I am in your pathetic little linkshell. What if I riled up enough doubt in your mind to make you question the very members of your linkshell in an attempt to ferret me out. What if that behavior contributed to the consternation amongst your members, thus resulting in a failed dynamis run today?

Yeah, what if?

You're too easy. So easy that any manipulation wasn't that challenging at all...or enjoyable. You're a bore.
#54 Sep 18 2008 at 3:11 AM Rating: Decent
Bummage wrote:
Now...what if I'm not actually a member of StarsMaker at all? What if I just played you like a cheap violin, making you jump through proverbial hoops in an attempt to figure out who I am in your pathetic little linkshell. What if I riled up enough doubt in your mind to make you question the very members of your linkshell in an attempt to ferret me out. What if that behavior contributed to the consternation amongst your members, thus resulting in a failed dynamis run today?


Then you're a liar. Either way you had access to the forums, so you either are or know someone who is/was.

Now, what if you're a moron who has no life? What you'll never face the truth of you playing topsy-turvy when you have no recourse? What if the rest of the world thinks that makes you pathetic?

And don't think for a minute you're the sole reason we had a failed run. Most people in the LS don't care about your existence that much.

Edited, Sep 18th 2008 6:07am by Jereth
#55 Sep 18 2008 at 7:20 AM Rating: Default
Jereth wrote:

Then you're a liar.


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

Either way you had access to the forums, so you either are or know someone who is/was.


Which is it?

Jereth wrote:

Now, what if you're a moron who has no life?


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

What you'll never face the truth of you playing topsy-turvy when you have no recourse?


No offense...well, maybe some...but I wish you'd construct your sentences in a less grammatically clumsy manner. That comment I just quoted doesn't make any sense.

Jereth wrote:

What if the rest of the world thinks that makes you pathetic?


...stick and stones...

Jereth wrote:
And don't think for a minute you're the sole reason we had a failed run.


No, not just me. I'm merely the voice here. There were others that worked just as diligently in bringing your linkshell to a level of cooperation that we wished you to be at.
#56 Sep 18 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
No offense...well, maybe some...but I wish you'd construct your sentences in a less grammatically clumsy manner. That comment I just quoted doesn't make any sense.


1) Ad hominem - ie; you have no point. Ergo, all you can do insult me without attempting to construct a point.

2) I challenge you to point our the grammar errors in that line you quoted outside of missing a comma. If you even realized that one, which I doubt.

3) Look at your own grammar mistakes before insulting others - lest you demonstrate your retardation again.

4) The point is there, you just refuse to grasp it. Playing the turn game on a whim in a frail attempt to save face only makes you look worse. That is the point. I have an idea, why don't you address what I say now before even I lose interest your childish antics.

Bummage wrote:
No, not just me. I'm merely the voice here. There were others that worked just as diligently in bringing your linkshell to a level of cooperation that we wished you to be at.


I think you represent yourself and your own insecure, personal agenda. I have spoke with more people than you in-game. Shocking I know. And yet, none of them are anything like you. You want to stalk, whine, and annoy while most do not.
#57 Sep 19 2008 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
Jereth wrote:


1) Ad hominem - ie; you have no point. Ergo, all you can do insult me without attempting to construct a point.


That isn't what Ad Hominem refers to, lol. It specifically refers to attacking someone's person to divert attention away from the point they have made. Which, ironically, is what you have been doing this entire time in these threads. Instead of responding to a point being made, you start calling names. Ergo, be sure to know your usage of latin before you start throwing out references to it.

Jereth wrote:

2) I challenge you to point our the grammar errors in that line you quoted outside of the grammar error of missing a comma.


ftfy


Jereth wrote:

3)lest you demonstrate your retardation again.


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

4) The point is there, you just refuse to grasp it.


No, it wasn't there. After mentioning you erred by leaving out a comma, I understood what you were attempting to say...albeit not a point in sight.

Jereth wrote:

your childish antics.


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

I think you represent yourself and your own insecure, personal agenda.


You've mentioned my "personal agenda" on more than one occasion, yet fail to state what you think that agenda is? I mean, "personal agenda" is a cutesy little phrase heard on TV and in movies when a melodrama is playing out, but so often people use it where it doesn't apply. Come out of TV-land Mule, get into the real world where people don't necessarily have that oh-so-melodramatic "personal agenda." You sound like a soap opera fan.

Jereth wrote:

I have spoke with more people than you in-game.


And?

Jereth wrote:

Shocking I know.


Is it shocking? You've had conversations in game with people. Why is that shocking? Do you find conversations challenging? Are you stating it was shocking because you typically fear having conversations with people? You make the strangest comments sometimes Mule.

Jereth wrote:

stalk, whine, and annoy


...sticks and stones...

Edited, Sep 19th 2008 12:40pm by Bummage
#58 Sep 19 2008 at 10:25 AM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
That isn't what Ad Hominem refers to, lol. It specifically refers to attacking someone's person to divert attention away from the point they have made. Which, ironically, is what you have been doing this entire time in these threads. Instead of responding to a point being made, you start calling names. Ergo, be sure to know your usage of latin before you start throwing out references to it.


I wasn't defining the phrase for you, that's google's job (which I'm sure you had to use for it). But, that's the tactic you were using and I expounded on it. You having no point does not mean you were attacking me rather than address the point. But whatever, I've already concluded I can say "apple" you'll complain that I must be wrong because I talked about a fruit.

And of course, you need to look up the difference of ie and eg btw. Be sure sure to know your usage of English before you attempt to correct someone.

Bummage wrote:
...sticks and stones...


Yeah, you really do enjoy making me like right. Keep up the fine work.

Bummage wrote:
No, it wasn't there. After mentioning you erred by leaving out a comma, I understood what you were attempting to say...albeit not a point in sight


So you admit you lack the intellectual capacity to decipher a sentence over one comma - nice. And lets not forget your attempts at grammar.

Bummage wrote:
You've mentioned my "personal agenda" on more than one occasion, yet fail to state what you think that agenda is?


I did. I will not repeat myself, it's plainly stated for those who bother to actually read my posts before attempting to comment on them.

Bummage wrote:
And?


You really aren't that quick are you? It means you obviously aren't the only influence and therefore obviously not the sole perpetrator in ruining the run. In fact, you had nothing to do with it despite your self-proclaimed victory. You need a course in reading comprehension if you cannot grasp simple context.

Bummage wrote:
...sticks and stones...


And yet you're still a lying, hypocritical coward. Only a moron would continue to brush it off like you do after being proven otherwise. It makes your entire stance baseless.
#59 Sep 19 2008 at 1:00 PM Rating: Default
Jereth wrote:

I wasn't defining the phrase for you, that's google's job (which I'm sure you had to use for it).


Actually, no...I didn't need to use google for anything. I was actually defining the phrase for you since your use of it was improper. It didn't make sense in the context of your comment.

Jereth wrote:

And of course, you need to look up the difference of ie and eg btw. Be sure sure to know your usage of English before you attempt to correct someone.


ie and eg? Have either of those been used by me? WTF are you talking about?

Jereth wrote:

Yeah, you really do enjoy making me like right. Keep up the fine work.


I enjoy making you like right? That doesn't make sense.

Jereth wrote:

So you admit you lack the intellectual capacity to decipher a sentence over one comma - nice.


No, it shows you cannot construct sentences that are grammatically correct.

Jereth wrote:
And lets not forget your attempts at grammar.


Oh, you are back to that tactic again. Make a claim, but fail to support it. Come on Mule, show examples that support your claim; otherwise, they don't mean anything.

Jereth wrote:

I did. I will not repeat myself, it's plainly stated for those who bother to actually read my posts before attempting to comment on them.


No you didn't, and you can't repeat yourself because you never stated it in the first place. Now you are merely throwing out false accusations with no direction whatsoever, just for the sake of argument.

Jereth wrote:

It means you obviously aren't the only influence and therefore obviously not the sole perpetrator in ruining the run.


Your run wasn't ruined. We prevented you from ruining another linkshell's scheduled run. Get the facts straight.

Jereth wrote:

In fact, you had nothing to do with it despite your self-proclaimed victory.


Riiiiiiight.

Jereth wrote:

You need a course in reading comprehension if you cannot grasp simple context.


I've never grasped simple context. I have, however, grasped the meaning of simple context...as well as the meaning of complicated context.

Damn, there's that pesky grammar again Mule. :D

Jereth wrote:

And yet you're still a lying, hypocritical coward.


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

Only a moron would continue to brush it off like you do after being proven otherwise.


What was proven otherwise? You're back to not making sense again. The only thing that was proven is that your leader is a racist pig, and you and the other members that follow him are just as guilty as he is. You and I can go back and forth for days, weeks, months, years...but no matter how much you try to deflect away from the disgusting behavior of your leader and his little followers, yourself included, the point still stands that he is racist.

Jereth wrote:
It makes your entire stance baseless.


The only stance I have taken in this debate is that the leader and members of StarsMaker are behaving inappropriately with regards to the rest of the community of our server. How is that baseless?

#60 Sep 19 2008 at 3:01 PM Rating: Good
**
383 posts
Icestunna wrote:
like in all EPIC FORUM BATTLEZ, it doesnt matter who wins cause theyre all losers.


See? We try to troll, and everyone ignores us. wtf.
#61 Sep 19 2008 at 10:45 PM Rating: Good
**
436 posts
TurboTom wrote:
See? We try to troll, and everyone ignores us. wtf.


If you're going to troll, troll big like 4chan.

LIke this for example.
#62 Sep 19 2008 at 11:18 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
vassarAK wrote:
TurboTom wrote:
See? We try to troll, and everyone ignores us. wtf.


If you're going to troll, troll big like 4chan.

LIke this for example.


Oh jesus that's awesome.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#63 Sep 20 2008 at 3:50 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprah_Winfrey

On September 19, 2008, Winfrey was duped into reading a message board post from her site on the subject of child rape which was actually a internet meme was posted by a user from the online community of 4chan.org. The meme originates from a YouTube video from the Japanese animation cartoon "Dragonball Z". Over 9000 fans tuned into this episode.[citation needed]


Lol, gotta admit, when 4chan do it, they do it big ^^
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 103 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (103)