Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Harry Potter and Last Thread About It (Part 2)Follow

#52 Jul 20 2011 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
5,529 posts
Diglett: This has been making its way around the internet recently.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129

#53 Jul 20 2011 at 5:47 PM Rating: Good
IDrownFish wrote:
Diglett: This has been making its way around the internet recently.


Nagini is female. The snake in the 1st book was male...
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a | Dihydrogen Monoxide (it kills)
#54 Jul 20 2011 at 7:20 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
*****
19,858 posts
Nagini is also a viper. The snake in the first book was a constrictor, which has neither teeth nor venom.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#55 Jul 20 2011 at 7:22 PM Rating: Good
******
43,928 posts
Constrictors have teeth.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#56 Jul 20 2011 at 7:40 PM Rating: Excellent
******
30,643 posts
The source is also a Rick Roll. I don't think this is real. Smiley: lol
#57 Jul 20 2011 at 8:07 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
*****
19,858 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Constrictors have teeth.


Well they have teeth, but not fangs (and the books make it clear that Nagini has two long fangs that can inject venom). Boa Constrictor teeth would leave shallow wounds, at best, and are really only used to hold onto prey while they, y'know, constrict it.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#58 Jul 20 2011 at 9:03 PM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
The source is also a Rick Roll. I don't think this is real. Smiley: lol


Yea i saw that in the Source link, but it is a poorly done one Smiley: tongue
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a | Dihydrogen Monoxide (it kills)
#59 Jul 20 2011 at 10:37 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
5,529 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
The source is also a Rick Roll. I don't think this is real. Smiley: lol


Yeah, that was the point. I don't think it worked too well. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129

#60 Aug 11 2011 at 7:38 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,748 posts
Queen idiggory wrote:
But, to be fair, that section grinds the flow of the book to a halt.


This. It's a film version. You kinda have to accept that everything not required to tell the story is going to potentially get cut. And Bombadil has nothing at all to do with the story. Deliberately.

Quote:
Tolkein admitted that he only included Bombadil because his kids loved him, but wished he had omitted him, because he was too poorly inserted into the story.


He also said that he left the character in because somewhere along the way he realized that every story and every world needed something out of place and unexplained. He'd spent so much time perfectly explaining every single thing and tying it all into a nice little bow, but real worlds aren't like that. So Bombadil stayed in the original books.

But yeah. No point in leaving him in the film. That whole section can be cut and not affect the story one bit.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#61 Aug 12 2011 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,128 posts
Great movie, in my opinion. It's been so long since I read the books that I didn't notice the deviations, but I found the flashback scene where Harry sees Severus' memories to be one of the best in the history of those movies.

The three protagonists have always bugged me. Harry's whining, Hermione's forced excitement and Ron's awkwardness was cute when they were 10 years old, or how old they were in the first, but to carry it on through seven films is just horrible.

And I don't like the makeovers they all got in the third or fourth movie. Hermione's hair turns normal, Ron gets buffed and Harry's hair stop being messy (which it never really was). And then someone outfitted them with designer jeans instead of capes. Smiley: facepalm
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#62 Aug 18 2011 at 6:17 PM Rating: Good
******
43,928 posts
Mazra wrote:
And then someone outfitted them with designer jeans instead of capes. Smiley: facepalm
Someone went further, but they did bring back the cape.
Screenshot
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 35 All times are in CDT
Jophiel, TherealLogros, Anonymous Guests (33)