Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Damn you, Marvel.Follow

#1 Mar 06 2010 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
So I've got this itch to read either Captain America or Iron Man, and I sit down and start on their first respective self titled books, only to realize that if I want the full story I have to read "Tales of Suspense" first. Damn you, Stan Lee.

So while I, um, wait for that, let's say you were a cape during Civil War. Who's side would you be on? Personally, I'd probably have gone with Tony, because while I understand the whole tradition of masks and anonymity aspect of the other side of the argument, they are weapons, and like any other weapon their powers should be registered. I don't agree with the militarization of it, but letting nuclear weapons run around do as they please doesn't really appeal to me, either.
Civil War
Steve Rogers - Captain America:12 (50.0%)
Tony Stark - Iron Man:12 (50.0%)
Total:24

And no, this isn't a subtle attempt to gather opinions on which of the two I should start on first. Really.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2 Mar 06 2010 at 6:55 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I can't stand Captain America, so Tony Stark it is.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#3 Mar 06 2010 at 8:05 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
It depends. Are we playing by real world rules? If so, then Tony Stark for sure. Captain America may be fast and strong, but out of a hundred mercenary snipers hired one of them is bound to get lucky. If we're playing by comic book rules, then I choose neither because we'll all fall into the oblivion that is retconning regardless of side.

#4 Mar 06 2010 at 8:08 PM Rating: Decent
Keeper of the Shroud
*****
13,632 posts
I'm not nearly nerdy enough to be able to vote on this particular subject.
#5 Mar 06 2010 at 8:36 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,162 posts
I would be with Cap. I wouldn't want the government to tell me who the bad guys are.
#6 Mar 07 2010 at 5:58 AM Rating: Good
**
629 posts
When in doubt - go with Cap.

#7 Mar 07 2010 at 6:45 AM Rating: Decent
himdraug wrote:
When in doubt - go with Cap.



Amen to that!

As for the self titled books, just know that the first ones were written a heck of a long time ago, I recently started with the Essential Avengers and I have to say that those first 100+ episodes were pretty darn bad, sexist and violent. (and no, not against their enemies, they fought more along themselves as far as I can tell)
#8 Mar 07 2010 at 10:50 AM Rating: Good
***
1,235 posts
I have heard much about the "Civil War" storyline. Is it something that will be (or already has been) compiled into a single "graphic novel" format book?
#9 Mar 07 2010 at 11:48 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I have heard much about the "Civil War" storyline. Is it something that will be (or already has been) compiled into a single "graphic novel" format book?


Yup.

And FYI- Iron Man just got retconned. He literally lost his mind & downloaded a version of his mind that he put on a hard drive pre civil war.

So he doesn't remember any of it, nor Secret Invasion.

I picked Cap as he had Nick Fury on his side. And Nick Fury is a bad ************.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#10 Mar 08 2010 at 7:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lolgaxe wrote:
So while I, um, wait for that, let's say you were a cape during Civil War. Who's side would you be on? Personally, I'd probably have gone with Tony, because while I understand the whole tradition of masks and anonymity aspect of the other side of the argument, they are weapons, and like any other weapon their powers should be registered. I don't agree with the militarization of it, but letting nuclear weapons run around do as they please doesn't really appeal to me, either.

I assume you mean which side I'd be on politically and not which side I think would win in a giant bar brawl.

From my very basic understanding of this plotline (I'm not a comics person by any means), I'd go with the Capt. Many super powers are usable as weapons but they are an innate part of who the person is, either by birth or accident. Registering people based on the circumstances of their birth seems a bit more facist than I'm ready to be comfortable with.

If someone wants to actually create a weapon, as Stark did, then sure let him register it. If someone breaks the law and is convicted of the crime, then sure let their powers be registered just as they would for some "villain". But registering people for merely being born with it is like registering all men because they were born with a ***** and might become rapists.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Mar 08 2010 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Jophiel wrote:
But registering people for merely being born with it is like registering all men because they were born with a ***** and might become rapists.

Except that in the Marvel universe some men are born with particularly big penises and could rape the entire world by themselves should they desire.

Now you could argue that registering superhumans might ultimately prove inadequate in addressing the issue, but suggesting that it is an infringement of the privacy rights of people who could very well destroy a city or two in a single tantrum is fairly ridiculous.
#12 Mar 08 2010 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Allegory wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
But registering people for merely being born with it is like registering all men because they were born with a ***** and might become rapists.

Except that in the Marvel universe some men are born with particularly big penises and could rape the entire world by themselves should they desire.

Now you could argue that registering superhumans might ultimately prove inadequate in addressing the issue, but suggesting that it is an infringement of the privacy rights of people who could very well destroy a city or two in a single tantrum is fairly ridiculous.


You could also make the argument that for large scale destructive systems legitimacy can and will become moot. You better be bringing some pretty large guns to the table if your goal is to rein in something with military strength equivalent to than of a small-mid size nation. That; or competent diplomacy.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#13 Mar 08 2010 at 4:56 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
You could also make the argument that for large scale destructive systems legitimacy can and will become moot. You better be bringing some pretty large guns to the table if your goal is to rein in something with military strength equivalent to than of a small-mid size nation. That; or competent diplomacy.

Allegory wrote:
Now you could argue that registering superhumans might ultimately prove inadequate in addressing the issue,

It's not so nice when it's done to you now is it?!

Edited, Mar 8th 2010 4:57pm by Allegory
#14 Mar 08 2010 at 5:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Allegory wrote:
Now you could argue that registering superhumans might ultimately prove inadequate in addressing the issue, but suggesting that it is an infringement of the privacy rights of people who could very well destroy a city or two in a single tantrum is fairly ridiculous.

Of course it's an infringment. You're trying to say that it's a worthwhile infringement upon their rights but that doesn't make it stop being an infringement.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Mar 08 2010 at 5:49 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Allegory wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
You could also make the argument that for large scale destructive systems legitimacy can and will become moot. You better be bringing some pretty large guns to the table if your goal is to rein in something with military strength equivalent to than of a small-mid size nation. That; or competent diplomacy.

Allegory wrote:
Now you could argue that registering superhumans might ultimately prove inadequate in addressing the issue,

It's not so nice when it's done to you now is it?!

Edited, Mar 8th 2010 4:57pm by Allegory


I'm missing the part where meanness is taking place.

More of a constructive symbiosis.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#16 Mar 08 2010 at 6:05 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Of course it's an infringment. You're trying to say that it's a worthwhile infringement upon their rights but that doesn't make it stop being an infringement.

You're correct, I spoke incorrectly. What I had intended and failed to get at was not that it was a worthwhile infringement, but that it was not longer worthwhile to pretend people had these rights. It's not that these rights are real and extreme circumstances prove an acceptable exemption, but that they never were there in the first place and in a universe significantly different than our own they are not longer useful to imagine.

That is why I think it is fairly ridiculous to make an argument that registering superhumans is an infringement on their rights.
#17 Mar 08 2010 at 6:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I don't know enough about imaginary Marvel world to say -- does the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment not exist in that world? If they do, then the super-powered folks should have a right to privacy which is being infringed upon by a legal onus to register their innate powers regardless of if/how they use them.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#18 Mar 08 2010 at 6:57 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
The whole issue is over a team of good guys going in to stop a bunch of bad guys, who at the time weren't really doing anything other than being on the lamb, for their reality TV show to get ratings, and said bad guy used his power to get away and destroyed a school full of young children.

The 14th Amendment exists, along with the rest. Its basically everything we have, but with explosions. So congress, along with supporters of the change from the super hero community (IE: Tony Stark / Iron Man and others) created a bill to have everyone register and have them train so an incident like that wouldn't happen again.

Edited, Mar 8th 2010 7:57pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#19 Mar 08 2010 at 7:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ok, so then it seems a pretty obvious infringement upon their rights if registration is mandatory. It might be one people think it worth it but it's an infringement nevertheless.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Mar 08 2010 at 7:10 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
You're correct, I spoke incorrectly. What I had intended and failed to get at was not that it was a worthwhile infringement, but that it was not longer worthwhile to pretend people had these rights. It's not that these rights are real and extreme circumstances prove an acceptable exemption, but that they never were there in the first place and in a universe significantly different than our own they are not longer useful to imagine.

That is why I think it is fairly ridiculous to make an argument that registering superhumans is an infringement on their rights.


Whom do they register to? Who makes them register? What is the penalty for non registration? Is that registration valuable enough to risk defection of parties which one would assume are of national interest?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#21 Mar 08 2010 at 8:25 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Is it like registration to the selective service that is mandatory?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#22 Mar 09 2010 at 12:36 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Yeah, I don't know if I could side with someone that locks people up in a secret prison in the Negative Zone. You know, it's interesting that Annihilus invaded the universe because the marvel universe was expanding into his, but it isn't like anyone on Earth 616 had exactly respected the boundaries of his domain.

Talk about shades of gray, Reed Richards is pretty creepy in Civil War.

Edited, Mar 9th 2010 12:37am by Paskil
#23 Mar 09 2010 at 12:40 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
On the subject of Damning Marvel...

One thing that has irked me is the way their stories are so disjointed. As an example from my last post: Annihilation books 1, 2, and 3. Just when the story seems to be working towards at least some sort of temporary resolution, it cuts off. This seems to be the case with all their books. I don't have the time, money, or resources to read through every other series to catch all the plot details and resolution. If you're going to make a separate plot involving crossovers, the entire story should start, run, and end in its entirety in the series. I don't care if you have to release 100 books to finish it, I'm not reading Amazing Spiderman #436 (or whatever) just to catch a few details not included in Civil War.
#24 Mar 09 2010 at 8:12 AM Rating: Good
Joph wrote:
Ok, so then it seems a pretty obvious infringement upon their rights if registration is mandatory. It might be one people think it worth it but it's an infringement nevertheless.


If I recall correctly, registration "is" (in the fictional Marvel World) only mandatory if you want to be a super hero. You had the option to retire if you have powers, or register if you wanted to use them. If you were not registered & used them in a public capacity, you were in violation of the Registration Act & the Tony Stark lead S.H.I.E.L.D (And now currently the Norman Osbourne run H.A.M.M.E.R.) would Party Van you. If you further refused to register, you got sent to prison.

It's kinda like registering a gun. If you use one in public it needs to be registered. If you simply own one & don't use it in public, it's kinda hard for the authorities to arrest you for an unregistered one.

Mutants weren't really factored in as the government had, at the time, tabs on the 198 that were left.

Cap had a real issue with this mostly because, back in his Nomad days, he had a real problem following the orders of some corrupt people. Government run Super Heroes post registration wasn't something he wanted to see abused again. Well, until their battle made a mess & hurt some folks causing Cap to surrender.

Then be "assassinated."

Which didn't actually happen. He was shot & put into suspended animation while being simultaneously unstuck in time, like Desmond on Lost, by the Red Skull who himself was "dead" but in the head of some other dude looking to transfer his consciousness into Cap's body.

Or something.

Oh and Bucky's not dead, he's the New Captain America.

So there's two.

Edited, Mar 9th 2010 1:20pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#25 Mar 09 2010 at 6:17 PM Rating: Good
That "makes sense".
#26 Mar 11 2010 at 12:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Omegavegeta wrote:
Cap had a real issue with this mostly because, back in his Nomad days, he had a real problem following the orders of some corrupt people. Government run Super Heroes post registration wasn't something he wanted to see abused again. Well, until their battle made a mess & hurt some folks causing Cap to surrender.

Then be "assassinated."

Which didn't actually happen. He was shot & put into suspended animation while being simultaneously unstuck in time, like Desmond on Lost, by the Red Skull who himself was "dead" but in the head of some other dude looking to transfer his consciousness into Cap's body.

Or something.

Oh and Bucky's not dead, he's the New Captain America.

So there's two.

I don't read comics although I sometimes enjoy reading threads about them and this is exactly why. I'm amused at the soap opera nature of the whole thing but I couldn't convince myself to actually spend money that that sort of silliness.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 121 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (121)