Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Alice in WonderlandFollow

#1 Mar 06 2010 at 2:30 PM Rating: Good
****
4,759 posts
So yesterday I went to see Alice in Wonderland, and quite liked it despite its massive departure from the original novel by Lewis Caroll. I was wondering if any of you had seen it, and what your initial impressions were?
____________________________
[quote]Capitalism Ho, ******************************************************************************** in /K/ where /K/lik is the new spam.[/url][/b]
Try out Eve free for a few weeks :D
#2 Mar 06 2010 at 4:13 PM Rating: Good
I plan to go see it tonight.

From what I understand it is a telling of when Alice goes back to visit.
So I'll get back to ya on if I liked it or not.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#3 Mar 06 2010 at 4:24 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Yeah. It's her second time there. I've enjoyed all the trailers a lot. So here's hoping. I plan to see it over Spring Break.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#4 Mar 06 2010 at 5:12 PM Rating: Good
****
4,759 posts
Sandinmygum wrote:
I plan to go see it tonight.

From what I understand it is a telling of when Alice goes back to visit.
So I'll get back to ya on if I liked it or not.


Yes it's actually an adaptation of Carroll's second novel of the series, Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, I did question why they called it Alice in Wonderland when that was the first book.
____________________________
[quote]Capitalism Ho, ******************************************************************************** in /K/ where /K/lik is the new spam.[/url][/b]
Try out Eve free for a few weeks :D
#5 Mar 06 2010 at 5:34 PM Rating: Good
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
Sandinmygum wrote:
I plan to go see it tonight.

From what I understand it is a telling of when Alice goes back to visit.
So I'll get back to ya on if I liked it or not.


Yes it's actually an adaptation of Carroll's second novel of the series, Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, I did question why they called it Alice in Wonderland when that was the first book.


Because Alice In Wonderland: Through the Looking-glass, and what Alice/She found There would be one long *** title lol.

Leaving here soon. My Mother, who never goes to the movies, has decided to join me. I hope she likes it, as she has really been into the trailers as they are shown on TV.
I think the last time I went to the movies with my Mother..I was like 5 and we went to go see the 1st Live Action TMNT movie.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#6 Mar 06 2010 at 5:34 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
I did question why they called it Alice in Wonderland when that was the first book.


I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people wouldn't know about the other books :)
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#7 Mar 06 2010 at 5:36 PM Rating: Good
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
I did question why they called it Alice in Wonderland when that was the first book.


I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people wouldn't know about the other books :)


This is true too.

There was a SyFy movie on a few months back that was a odd telling of the 2nd book. It was... odd.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#8 Mar 06 2010 at 5:55 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Honestly, until this post I didn't realize there was ever a second book.

And they have a good point, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There is way too long for a title. But Through the Looking Glass loses the audience that hasn't read the book (because my interest was first piqued by the idea of Burton doing an AiWL remake). What Alice Found There is closer, but still not close enough to keep that audience.

Just calling it Alice in Wonderland ensures the audience interest and it really isn't a huge sacrifice.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#9 Mar 06 2010 at 10:43 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,729 posts
I just saw this. It was entertaining, but not that great a movie. It felt like not much actually happened or meant anything. It looked really good though and had a really nice feel to it.

Overall I'd say it's worth seeing, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.
____________________________
75 Rabbit/75 Sheep/75 Coeurl/75 Eft/75 Raptor/75 Hippogryph/75 Puk
75 Scorpion/75 Wamoura/75 Pixie/75 Peiste/64 Sabotender
51 Bird/41 Mandragora/40 Bee/37 Crawler/37 Bat

Items no one cares about: O
Missions no one cares about: O
Crafts no one cares about: O
#10 Mar 07 2010 at 12:00 AM Rating: Good
Karlina wrote:
I just saw this. It was entertaining, but not that great a movie. It felt like not much actually happened or meant anything. It looked really good though and had a really nice feel to it.

Overall I'd say it's worth seeing, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.


You didn't leave with the mind set "I should walk my own path, and not that of what others would have me"?

I liked it. I really need to find my old books and re-read them. Alice and Oz were fav child stories.
My mother enjoyed it too, and that is cool because she (and my Father) is really hard to please with movies.

Now to wait for the Dreamworks Dragon movie..it looks cool.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#11 Mar 07 2010 at 5:20 AM Rating: Good
****
5,729 posts
Sandinmygum wrote:
You didn't leave with the mind set "I should walk my own path, and not that of what others would have me"?

That's not really what I mean.

I know that there was a decent, if unoriginal story with an ending and a lesson learned and all that, but when the movie ended I couldn't help asking myself, 'was there a point to all that'?

The original books stand on the sheer force of their own nonsensical weirdness while this movie told a generic story with a bunch of Alice references thrown in to make it look good.
____________________________
75 Rabbit/75 Sheep/75 Coeurl/75 Eft/75 Raptor/75 Hippogryph/75 Puk
75 Scorpion/75 Wamoura/75 Pixie/75 Peiste/64 Sabotender
51 Bird/41 Mandragora/40 Bee/37 Crawler/37 Bat

Items no one cares about: O
Missions no one cares about: O
Crafts no one cares about: O
#12 Mar 16 2010 at 5:37 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
I enjoyed it a lot. "Is she the right Alice?" was such a piquant question. As in "Is Alice letting herself be the person she wants to be?"

The costuming and art direction was gorgeous. Alice was a babe, even if rather a flat chested 19.

As a psychological allegory I loved it. Sometimes, just sometimes, at the appropriate time, you just have to take someone's head off. And you have to be strong enough to face the overwhelming big nasties of the world. But it's all about balance.

All the best people are bonkers, even if they are often sad inside themselves.

Indiscriminate cruelty will just get you unloved and surrounded by lying sycophants.

I loved the wafty, peace-loving white queen who paradoxically, while not being able to bear harming the living, thrived on harvesting the dead. And there is that great paradox of Ghandi, Trippitaka, and Dr Who like pacifists. If their enemies will attack them murderously even in the face of their pacifism, then someone (something) else has to step forward and do the dirty work for them.
#13 Mar 16 2010 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Aripyanfar wrote:
Alice was a babe, even if rather a flat chested 19.


Agreed.

Does it make me a bad man if I look at beautiful women and think "They would look even better if they had larger breasts"?



I blame my mother.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#14 Mar 16 2010 at 2:49 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,759 posts
Karlina wrote:
The original books stand on the sheer force of their own nonsensical weirdness while this movie told a generic story with a bunch of Alice references thrown in to make it look good.


What really made the books good was the way everything was referencing something in real life and mirrored how one should act and conduct one's self. The books seem weird at a surface level but you need to delve deeper than that to get any real meaning out of them. The same can be said for the movie. There were so many things especially the "Right Alice" thing that Ari pointed out, that had some ulterior meaning; those were the purpose of the movie as much as they were the purpose of the books. Even though the books used completely different imagery and allusions to reach different moral conclusions

Sandinmygum wrote:
Agreed.

Does it make me a bad man if I look at beautiful women and think "They would look even better if they had larger breasts"?


Yes, indeed she is and yes indeed it does.


Edited, Mar 16th 2010 2:53pm by Manosuke
____________________________
[quote]Capitalism Ho, ******************************************************************************** in /K/ where /K/lik is the new spam.[/url][/b]
Try out Eve free for a few weeks :D
#15 Mar 18 2010 at 9:23 AM Rating: Decent
It wasn't bad, but to be honest it was a bit too much of a family movie. Not really what I expected from Tim Burton. Ofcourse, it's a Disney movie, but why go with that director if not for his ability to perhaps add a bit of weirdness and just a bit more muchness to it.

A bit of a missed opportunity imo.

But visually pleasing, no denying that.
#16 Apr 08 2010 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good
***
1,738 posts
Zieveraar wrote:
It wasn't bad, but to be honest it was a bit too much of a family movie. Not really what I expected from Tim Burton.


There's some pretty dark stuff in that movie. For example, in the Red Queen's first scene, we see her order a starving man executed for eating, and then she makes plans to devour his surviving children. Imagine that the talking animals are replaced with humans and you see them being treated they way they are in the movie; it's pretty horrific.
____________________________
Mazra wrote:
I looked out the window and saw a big fireball in the sky. I'm not going outside until it's gone.
#18 Apr 14 2010 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
Tasera wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:
It wasn't bad, but to be honest it was a bit too much of a family movie. Not really what I expected from Tim Burton.


There's some pretty dark stuff in that movie. For example, in the Red Queen's first scene, we see her order a starving man executed for eating, and then she makes plans to devour his surviving children. Imagine that the talking animals are replaced with humans and you see them being treated they way they are in the movie; it's pretty horrific.


It was all a bit erratic though imo. The Mad Hatter character is the same, deadly serious one moment, joking the next. Intentional I suppose, but I just didn't enjoy him at all.

There are a few dark scenes in it, but as a whole it just was too much of a family movie for me.

Still, much more enjoyable and prettier in 3D than another movie I saw recently.
#19 Apr 24 2010 at 9:19 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
I loved the Mad Hatter. And there were two really serious and tragic aspects to his relationship to Alice in the movie. Firstly he gave strong hints later on of being one sidedly in love with her, and despairing over it always being the wrong timing: either she was too small, or too large for him. They were never the same in the same place and time.

Secondly he was the one character that questioned if he was a figment of her imagination, and he despaired of the oblivion he would be consigned to when she went away and returned to consciousness.
#20 May 28 2010 at 4:32 PM Rating: Default
***
1,882 posts
Karlina wrote:

I know that there was a decent, if unoriginal story with an ending and a lesson learned and all that, but when the movie ended I couldn't help asking myself, 'was there a point to all that'?

The original books stand on the sheer force of their own nonsensical weirdness while this movie told a generic story with a bunch of Alice references thrown in to make it look good.


Exactly. Morals and allegories aside, I am convinced that this movie was made almost exclusively so Johnny Depp could be weird.

Edited, May 28th 2010 4:33pm by Lecan
#21 May 28 2010 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
Lecan wrote:
Karlina wrote:

I know that there was a decent, if unoriginal story with an ending and a lesson learned and all that, but when the movie ended I couldn't help asking myself, 'was there a point to all that'?

The original books stand on the sheer force of their own nonsensical weirdness while this movie told a generic story with a bunch of Alice references thrown in to make it look good.


Exactly. Morals and allegories aside, I am convinced that this movie was made almost exclusively so Johnny Depp could be weird.

Edited, May 28th 2010 4:33pm by Lecan


And so he could Futterwacken off in front of a worldwide audience.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#22 May 28 2010 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,235 posts
Shaowstrike wrote:
Lecan wrote:
Karlina wrote:

I know that there was a decent, if unoriginal story with an ending and a lesson learned and all that, but when the movie ended I couldn't help asking myself, 'was there a point to all that'?

The original books stand on the sheer force of their own nonsensical weirdness while this movie told a generic story with a bunch of Alice references thrown in to make it look good.


Exactly. Morals and allegories aside, I am convinced that this movie was made almost exclusively so Johnny Depp could be weird.

Edited, May 28th 2010 4:33pm by Lecan


And so he could Futterwacken off in front of a worldwide audience.

Yeah... That scene, I just went, "Ooooh... kay..."

Is it sad that I'm posting in a necroed post that's only a month old, and can say that this movie's out on video soon?
#23 May 28 2010 at 5:06 PM Rating: Default
***
1,882 posts
I got bored and wandered back in to this forum, sorry. I tried to stick to the front page at least.
#24 May 29 2010 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
***
1,235 posts
Lecan wrote:
I got bored and wandered back in to this forum, sorry. I tried to stick to the front page at least.

If the thread is a month old, but is still on the front page, does it count as a necro-post?

Don't be sorry. This forum can always use more folks. :)
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 169 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (169)