Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Xmen Origins.Follow

#1 Apr 01 2009 at 1:35 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Have you seen it?

Just curious.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#2 Apr 01 2009 at 2:48 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Posted: Apr 1st 2009 5:35pm |
April fools stops at Midday, don't you know ANYTHING?
____________________________
[wowsig]2213854[/wowsig]
Jarkeld Hammerhiem Lvl 36 Paladin/Lvl 30 Armourer
Lestril Hammerhiem Lvl 40 Monk/Lvl 28 Provisioner Blackburrow server
Iaedian Tailchaser lvl 60 Fury/36 Jeweler. Proud member of <Bane> Crushbone server

Your mind is like a Parachute, it only works if it's open.
#3 Apr 01 2009 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Baron von tarv wrote:
Quote:
Posted: Apr 1st 2009 5:35pm |
April fools stops at Midday, don't you know ANYTHING?


No, It's not an April fools joke. I was serious.

The youtube video is just a laugh about the acts required to have seen the movie.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#4 Apr 01 2009 at 8:02 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,945 posts
Ok, now I have watched all sorts of Lazytown videos.... thanks...!
____________________________
In Memory of Kyrin (Grianne, Bahamut) 1972-2009 RIP
It's better to be hated for what you are then to be liked for what you are not.

Signature Image
Lisette - 80 Blood Elf Mage - Exodar
Veteran of Dead of Winter
Tailor: 450 Engineer: 450 Cooking: 450 Fishing: 450 First Aid: 450
Mounts: 63 Pets: 63






#5 Apr 01 2009 at 9:39 PM Rating: Good
Do you want to see it?

link


-EDIT Watching Now
lol @ some of the "rough cut" special effects

-edit 2
It's not as good as X-Men 1 or 2, but better than 3.

Edited, Apr 2nd 2009 5:09am by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#6 Apr 02 2009 at 3:11 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
I thought it'd be a Spongebob movie, being April Fools, but I downloaded it anyway ...

Watching it now, I'm only interested in the movie for Deadpool. I'll edit once I'm done to pass judgment.

Edit 1: So far, he's smarmy. Not too bad, really.

Edit 2 Movie not so bad, quite enjoyable. More so if you don't really follow the comics. If you do follow the comics, and are a fan of Deadpool (such as myself) ...

FUCK YOU, SNIKTDUDE, THE MERC WITHOUT A MOUTH! FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU! Smiley: mad

Edited, Apr 2nd 2009 8:37am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#7 Apr 02 2009 at 3:49 AM Rating: Good
Ryan Reynolds makes a great Deadpool.

Too bad they only had him for a weeks worth of shooting, cause when he shows back up "he's" not quite as cool.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#8 Apr 02 2009 at 4:37 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
Yeah, the first scenes with him he's a good Wade Wilson. It's that Weapon XI Sniktdude crap that's evil. Smiley: mad

Silent Deadpool = Fail.

The eye lazers, BAMFing and arm swords didn't help ... but I'm sure Comic Deadpool would love the arm swords ... I can picture it, too. He'd keep making Wolvy jokes while using them. "Lookit me, I snikt!"

But don't get me wrong, I did kind of like the movie. I've seen worse.

Edited, Apr 2nd 2009 9:08am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#9 Apr 03 2009 at 9:01 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Do you want to see it?

link


-EDIT Watching Now
lol @ some of the "rough cut" special effects

-edit 2
It's not as good as X-Men 1 or 2, but better than 3.

Edited, Apr 2nd 2009 5:09am by Omegavegeta


That's not really saying much though, just about any movie released at that time was better than X-Men 3. Heck, I even enjoyed that Shield movie with David Hasselhof more than X-Men 3.
____________________________


#10 Apr 03 2009 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
Under A Thumb...
*****
10,008 posts
Zieveraar wrote:
Heck, I even enjoyed that Shield movie with David Hasselhof more than X-Men 3.


You mean Nick Fury: Agent Of Shield?
____________________________
Quote:
I would imagine that if you could understand Morse code, a tap dancer would drive you crazy.
Lebowski Fest | Church of the Latter-Day Dude | Nick And Dooie!
#11 Apr 03 2009 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:
Heck, I even enjoyed that Shield movie with David Hasselhof more than X-Men 3.


You mean Nick Fury: Agent Of Shield?


Oh most definitely that movie! I have to admit, I've got a thing for Hasselhof, sure most of the things for television he does are pretty bad but still, he's no.1 in Germany!

To be completely honest, not many movies are worse than X-Men 3 though, so Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD can easily be described as better.
____________________________


#12 Apr 04 2009 at 12:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
That's not really saying much though, just about any movie released at that time was better than X-Men 3.


Hugh Jackman is still a great Wolverine. Liev Schriber's good throughout most of it, but was considerably un-Sabretoothy at the end. The kid who played Gambit was actually pretty good, but I had a few gripes about him.

Now, this is more a gripe about some Comic movies in general as of late (with the sole exception The Dark Knight.) If you saw Watchmen, the prison fight scene especially had some really over the top action. Now, you're supposed to buy into these being people, well trained, but with NO superpowers, in costumes fighting crime. Yet, they are doing things that break the "wall of humanity" (Things a human being cannot do): kicking people across rooms, jumping super high...etc.

Gambit's "power" (in comics) is to charge things and make them explode on impact. His favorite projectile is a deck of cards, which if you've ever tried to throw is actually really hard to do. But it is possible to do without again "breaking the wall of humanity".

In the movie, he can "magically" levitate them & throw them around. He can jump incredible distances, jump from incredible heights, & he can even run up walls. His "movie" powers are not really explained.

Deadpool is a mutant (I guess?) at the beginning of the flick who's power seems to revolve around being really good with swords. This is not explained & by the time you see him again, there's no reason to bother (I'm trying not spoil too much).

I don't know what The Blob was supposed to have for powers besides super strength.

The plot touches on the Origin story, his Team 7 days (W/William Stryker in charge), & of course Weapon X. There are extended cameos by Cyclops & the White Queen (who is now Silverfox's sister). Toad & Xavier make short appearances as well.

I'd give it a C+, a litle above average, or a B if somehow Ryan Reynolds turns his 10minutes of Deadpool into a spin off movie.

And he not only @#%^ed Scarlett Johansson, he married her.

I'm inclined to believe the man can do anything.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#13 Apr 04 2009 at 12:48 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
In the movie, he can "magically" levitate them & throw them around.
I think that was more due to the rough unfinished nature of the special effects. In the comics, Gambit is always seen doing various card tricks, like juggling them. A quick flip, catch, and toss wouldn't be entirely out of the question here.

... Unless the finished product leaves it as levitating cards.

Edited, Apr 4th 2009 4:49am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#14 Apr 04 2009 at 3:55 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
I don't know what The Blob was supposed to have for powers besides super strength.


I thought that was it. He's just really fat because he likes to eat.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#15 Apr 04 2009 at 7:01 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
Allow me to geek out for a second, but I don't remember comic Blob as being super strong. His mutant ability revolved around him being an Unmovable Object, and his fat was somewhat elastic so he could keep from getting slashed and blown up without being hurt.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#16 Apr 04 2009 at 8:08 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
In the movie, he can "magically" levitate them & throw them around.
I think that was more due to the rough unfinished nature of the special effects. In the comics, Gambit is always seen doing various card tricks, like juggling them. A quick flip, catch, and toss wouldn't be entirely out of the question here.

... Unless the finished product leaves it as levitating cards.

Edited, Apr 4th 2009 4:49am by lolgaxe


Ya, that's one of the downsides of the uncut, roughness.

My brother saw it and thought Agent Zero was firing bullets out of his clips without guns. I had to explain to him that the guns he threw up into the air were supposed to come back down on the new clips, but the 3-D graphics weren't finished.


As far as Gambit jumping high and "running on walls", that could just be an extension of his existing powers. "High Jumping" could be just an explosive boost.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#17 Apr 05 2009 at 12:04 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
A quick flip, catch, and toss wouldn't be entirely out of the question here.


He doesn't flip em' though. He levitates like, half the deck in a semi-circle and shoots them out of the middle of the semi-circle one at a time while the rest continue to float there.

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#18 Apr 05 2009 at 6:03 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
665 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Allow me to geek out for a second, but I don't remember comic Blob as being super strong. His mutant ability revolved around him being an Unmovable Object, and his fat was somewhat elastic so he could keep from getting slashed and blown up without being hurt.
Blob has the ability to control all of his body mass comprised of fat, skin etc. In fact he can take all of the accumulated weight and focus it in one place, giving him the semblance of strength when it would be better described as a malleable inertia.

If I recall (I've not read comics heavily in some time) I saw in passing that Blob somehow lost his powers, at least for a time. The picture that depicted a depowered blob looked a lot like a person after they had a stomach staple done and lost a lot of weight. His skin was falling from his body because he had no control over it anymore, gravity took over where he no longer could and he looked like a mass of flesh.
____________________________
WAR 6/18/06
Suppanomimi: 6/20/06 Rajas Ring: 8/20/06
NIN [Current Main] TP|WS
PLD TP|WS /// SAM TP
#19 Apr 05 2009 at 8:22 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
A quick flip, catch, and toss wouldn't be entirely out of the question here.


He doesn't flip em' though. He levitates like, half the deck in a semi-circle and shoots them out of the middle of the semi-circle one at a time while the rest continue to float there.



From what I saw, it spun the deck of cards in a large loop and shot them forward. Similar to Matchbox cars going through the loop-d-loop thing. And when he was dealing the deck was floating, and the cards were being shot out.

But of course, this is all from an unfinished CG rendering, so we have no idea what the actual end product looks like. It could be that the actors arms are going to be digitally altered to be handling the cards quickly and skillfully.


Bottom line:
Stop nit picking at the CG, when they CG isn't even finished! Wait for the final product, then complain.


Bauran wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Allow me to geek out for a second, but I don't remember comic Blob as being super strong. His mutant ability revolved around him being an Unmovable Object, and his fat was somewhat elastic so he could keep from getting slashed and blown up without being hurt.
Blob has the ability to control all of his body mass comprised of fat, skin etc. In fact he can take all of the accumulated weight and focus it in one place, giving him the semblance of strength when it would be better described as a malleable inertia.

If I recall (I've not read comics heavily in some time) I saw in passing that Blob somehow lost his powers, at least for a time. The picture that depicted a depowered blob looked a lot like a person after they had a stomach staple done and lost a lot of weight. His skin was falling from his body because he had no control over it anymore, gravity took over where he no longer could and he looked like a mass of flesh.


There is a whole story line where millions of mutants lose their abilities due to the Scarlet Witch. The Blob was one of them.

Edited, Apr 5th 2009 12:24pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#20 Apr 05 2009 at 11:24 PM Rating: Good
TirithRR wrote:

From what I saw, it spun the deck of cards in a large loop and shot them forward. Similar to Matchbox cars going through the loop-d-loop thing. And when he was dealing the deck was floating, and the cards were being shot out.

But of course, this is all from an unfinished CG rendering, so we have no idea what the actual end product looks like. It could be that the actors arms are going to be digitally altered to be handling the cards quickly and skillfully.



I watched that scene again today. I think that was a finish product unless I saw a different version. He loops the card around in a semi circle, and in slow motion the cards face values (Ace of Spades which he's holding, Queen of Clubs, 3 of Clubs) have an electric pink/purple aura around them, then he extends his arm out, and the cards follow the simi-circle and follow the path of his outstretched arm shooting out at Wolverine. The reason why I believe that is a finished CGI scene is because a lot of the CGI stuff that was actually rendered in the movie was used for the trailer. That scene with gambit was in the latest trailer if I remember correctly.

Edited, Apr 6th 2009 12:28am by ImmortalAlchemist
____________________________


Return1 argued with Mellowy and wrote:

Seriously, you won't be @#%^ing happy until SE releases a full sized Bahamut avatar you can @#%^ing ride and use to kill players that annoy you, one shot AV/PW/Shinryuu, and burn the FFXI nations to the @#%^ing ground for fun. All while actually restoring mp used instead of costing any.

#21 Apr 06 2009 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
PM Me When You're Sober
Avatar
*****
15,784 posts
Gambit can do what he wants with the cards because what he charges the cards with is Kinetic energy, which, at least in my mind, can force motion and almost be like a really sh*tty make-shift telekinesis.
#22 Apr 06 2009 at 11:28 PM Rating: Good
Actually, Kinetic energy is the "extra" energy an object has while in motion. Hence the "boom" on impact aspect of him throwing cards.

How he can use that to do things like "phase" his staff in order to clime up walls & detonate an explosion that destroys an entire block with his staff (without actually destroying the staff itself) eludes me in the context of his "comic" book abilities.

But this is the movie version, so it can always be explained away with a simple "his powers work slightly different".

The helicoptering of his staff when jumping off that building was cheesy as @#%^ though.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#23 Apr 07 2009 at 3:37 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
Well, the cane could have been a conduit and his Asplosion power could of just "ended" on the street itself before blowing up. Sure, it's a stretch, but let's face it: It's Marvel. It doesn't need to be feasible, just look cool.

Now, I went back and rewatched the Gambit scene again, and the part we're discussing looks like he pulls the cards up in a loop, then swings his arm down to throw them. That's about the best I can figure it out to be.

I guess they had to take some creative chances for it. I mean, comics are still frames, so they can draw Gambit's cards any which way they want, and how often has it been shown him throwing a whole deck at a time? A little harder to mix CG and live action for something like that, I'm sure. I didn't think it looked that bad, pretty in-character for him.

That helicopter thing, though ... yeah, f'n retarded. He's an agile thief, okay we get that much. But that was waaaaaaaay off.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#24 Apr 07 2009 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Actually, Kinetic energy is the "extra" energy an object has while in motion. Hence the "boom" on impact aspect of him throwing cards.

How he can use that to do things like "phase" his staff in order to clime up walls & detonate an explosion that destroys an entire block with his staff (without actually destroying the staff itself) eludes me in the context of his "comic" book abilities.

But this is the movie version, so it can always be explained away with a simple "his powers work slightly different".

The helicoptering of his staff when jumping off that building was cheesy as @#%^ though.


I barely noticed that helicoptering myself though, and I believe he used a staff in the comics too at times. Although his cards were always his favourite, I wonder what happened to him in the comics, haven't read them in quite a while and not all that many recent ones are to be found on the marvel site.


I was a bit disappointed myself in the movie, it's all just too much for one movie and the final fight against weapon XI is just too fast.

And Deadpool was much more interesting before the change.


Omegavegeta wrote:
Hugh Jackman is still a great Wolverine. Liev Schriber's good throughout most of it, but was considerably un-Sabretoothy at the end. The kid who played Gambit was actually pretty good, but I had a few gripes about him.


Actually, it's not really that unlike something that did happen in some comic too. Although it's probably for the best that they didn't go into the whole "paralel evolution out of canines or cats", I do feel they did the whole eternal feud between the two fairly well. Lack of time to deepen it out more though, it works a heck of a lot better in the comics, way more reasons in there for that feud.

I liked Schriber's performance, compared to X-Men 1, that's not very hard, they really didn't do Sabretooth justice then.

Omegavegeta wrote:
In the movie, he can "magically" levitate them & throw them around. He can jump incredible distances, jump from incredible heights, & he can even run up walls. His "movie" powers are not really explained.


Not exactly, he just throws them in an arch really fast, using the energy he puts in them to propell them towards Wolverine. All just really, really fast so it looks like they are hovering. Irrelevant really,


Quote:
There is a whole story line where millions of mutants lose their abilities due to the Scarlet Witch. The Blob was one of them.



And then there's the story line where Sinister manages to switch off everyone's mutated DNA element, making every single one human.

I'm trying to think of when that happened before, but other than the mutant dampening field Magneto used in his fortress, I can't really think of anytime, although I seem to recall it did.

Omegavegeta wrote:
The plot touches on the Origin story, his Team 7 days (W/William Stryker in charge), & of course Weapon X. There are extended cameos by Cyclops & the White Queen (who is now Silverfox's sister). Toad & Xavier make short appearances as well.


Wasn't that Paige Guthrie instead of the White Queen? Although Emma can change her skin to diamond and Paige had to shed skin to change so I suppose it would be the White Queen, would be fitting to see the pair of them together too.
____________________________


#25 Apr 08 2009 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
30 posts
Never seen any of the X men movies... how many are there. I hate how they did a hulk movie a few years back... and then made another hulk movie... but it wasnt a sequel, just another remake or something like that. Didn't they do that with the punisher too?
____________________________
By deliberately changing the internal image of reality, people can change the world.
-Willis Harman

- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Monolithe
#26 Apr 08 2009 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
10,868 posts
Gambit can start and stop the kinetic reaction in anything he touches, so like mentioned above he was using the staff to extend his reach. He just spread the charge down the staff into the object then after the object was ready to explode he just pulled the staff back and stopped the reaction in it.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#27 Apr 11 2009 at 4:53 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,246 posts
I hate when Hollywood takes artistic lisence like this. Poor Deadpool. Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#28 Apr 11 2009 at 8:13 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Nilatai the Intelligent wrote:
I hate when Hollywood takes artistic lisence like this. Poor Deadpool. Smiley: disappointed


So... the actor that played him at the end wasn't Ryan Reynolds. Is that why they had to @#%^ him up so much?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#29 Apr 11 2009 at 10:26 PM Rating: Good
Ryan Reynolds only had a couple weeks to film. Now, in the final version, there's either more Deadpool OR the "extra" stuff that was rumored to film was simply the actual stuff the Ryan Reynolds could commit too.

And they filmed that stuff in Vancouver, the rest in Australia.

I'm 99% sure OmegaDeadpool is NOT Ryan Reynolds though.

Edited, Apr 12th 2009 2:27am by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#30 Apr 12 2009 at 5:14 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Ryan Reynolds only had a couple weeks to film. Now, in the final version, there's either more Deadpool OR the "extra" stuff that was rumored to film was simply the actual stuff the Ryan Reynolds could commit too.

And they filmed that stuff in Vancouver, the rest in Australia.

I'm 99% sure OmegaDeadpool is NOT Ryan Reynolds though.

Edited, Apr 12th 2009 2:27am by Omegavegeta


Looked it up on imdb.com and it looks like "Weapon XI" was played by Scott Adkins.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0012078/

I don't recognize him from anything... he kinda looks like Seth Green...
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#31 Apr 12 2009 at 7:57 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
Even if Ryan Reynolds did play Deadpool Sniktpeel Weapon XI, the fact they sewed his mouth shut still wouldn't have made the character salvageable. At least there's the solo rumor, hopefully it is in the same vein as they completely ignored the "teenbro" Hulk in favor of the more recent version.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#32 Apr 12 2009 at 4:10 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,042 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Even if Ryan Reynolds did play Deadpool Sniktpeel Weapon XI, the fact they sewed his mouth shut still wouldn't have made the character salvageable. At least there's the solo rumor, hopefully it is in the same vein as they completely ignored the "teenbro" Hulk in favor of the more recent version.


But what if this whole thing is merely a huge April Fools day joke? Was it a coincidence that the "leaked workprint" got leaked right at April 1st?

Then on May 1st it comes out and the ending battle is completely different!
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#33 Apr 12 2009 at 4:45 PM Rating: Decent
Internet Footsie Lawyer
*****
12,845 posts
Blob also had invulnerability. He was depowered and became a skinny man with saggy skin.

Quote:
He has superhuman strength, endurance, and great resiliency to physical injury due to a further mutation. The Blob's elastic, blubbery skin has proven to be difficult to penetrate by gunfire, missiles, and even Wolverine's claws; though with sufficient force and a favorable angle, the claws can lacerate his flesh
He can also alter his personal mono-directional gravity field beneath himself to make himself virtually immovable as long as he is in contact with the ground, although an incredible force can uproot him, along with a chunk of whatever he is standing on. The only beings on record to have been able to move the Blob against his wishes are the Hulk[11] Juggernaut and Strong Guy (powered-up near his limit by absorbing kinetic energy),[29] although Colossus has managed to lift Dukes by digging underground and raising the piece of earth Dukes stands on, stating this as an exception to his immovability.[15] Despite his morbidly obese appearance, the Blob's speed and agility is that of a fairly athletic male of normal stature, a fact which frequently catches his opponents by surprise.


Im excited to see this movie
____________________________
>.> heheheheh I am DF's sockpuppet.
rachelravage.us (somewhat NWS website)
http://www.guytalon.com/linger15.html My freeze Fetish DVD, on sale now! (WORK SAFE!)
http://venasevildolls.blogspot.com/ NWS
Niobia will establish a charity for orphaned mooses. (meese?) - Kao
ElneClare wrote:
So grow up folks and don't post anything you don't want your child to read. Doesn't matter if they are in diapers or adults, if it can upset them or you then it shouldn't be posted.
#34 Apr 13 2009 at 1:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
TirithRR wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Even if Ryan Reynolds did play Deadpool Sniktpeel Weapon XI, the fact they sewed his mouth shut still wouldn't have made the character salvageable. At least there's the solo rumor, hopefully it is in the same vein as they completely ignored the "teenbro" Hulk in favor of the more recent version.


But what if this whole thing is merely a huge April Fools day joke? Was it a coincidence that the "leaked workprint" got leaked right at April 1st?

Then on May 1st it comes out and the ending battle is completely different!


Now that would be a very elaborate april fools, I fear that it isn't the case.

It would be quite fun though.
____________________________


#35 Apr 13 2009 at 3:26 AM Rating: Good
******
41,361 posts
TirithRR wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Even if Ryan Reynolds did play Deadpool Sniktpeel Weapon XI, the fact they sewed his mouth shut still wouldn't have made the character salvageable. At least there's the solo rumor, hopefully it is in the same vein as they completely ignored the "teenbro" Hulk in favor of the more recent version.
But what if this whole thing is merely a huge April Fools day joke? Was it a coincidence that the "leaked workprint" got leaked right at April 1st?

Then on May 1st it comes out and the ending battle is completely different!
That would be, by far, the single greatest April Fools Joke/Hoax since H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds.

Edited, Apr 13th 2009 7:27am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#36 May 04 2009 at 5:40 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
4,100 posts
*Spoiler Warning*
Which is a big "duh" considering the content thus far in this post...

Saw this on Saturday. I was terribly disappointed in how they did Deadpool, considering the actual story of Wade Wilson. I expected there to be at least some authenticity to his story due to the rumors of a solo spinoff. Aside from him inheriting Wolverine's mutant regeneration/healing through the Weapon X program, everything else was just pushed together for this film. There was no "Weapon XI" and/or super combination of mutant powers like that with Deadpool (in fact he didn't even get the abilities until much later). The program was to imbue Wolverines mutant ability to other mutant/mercs and the rejects of the program (ie. Deadpool, Slayback, Sluggo, Wildchild, Ajax, etc.) were sent to a seperate facility to test and find out why.

The real disappointment is that Deadpool has such a dark, rich backstory that would have made an absolutely awesome movie (if handled right and rated R), and it would have been great to see the relationship/turmoil between himself and Death post-Weapon X program in the reject facility, and the actualy "Dead Pool" events.

Instead they just turned him into fodder for Wolvy to kill in the movie. Yippee...

Jackman was definately born to play Wolverine, though. And Liev Schreiber was a terrific Sabertooth. Agent Zero was, blah. Gambit...well...I think even people that simply saw the trailer know that he was terribly cast, so you don't even need to see the movie to know his representation sucked.

Ah well, hopefully Origins: Magneto will be better. Plenty to look forward to this summer with the new Transformers movie, G.I. Joe, and future Marvel movies on the later horizon.

Edited, May 4th 2009 9:42am by Ryneguy
____________________________
Common sense is not so common -Voltaire
Wyne Aeros - Hyperion Server
ARRFishing.com

#37 May 04 2009 at 6:50 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,394 posts
The movie was silly and was worth nothing plot-wise. However, it kept me mildly entertained most of the time so it was worth the $4.50 I spent to see it. Smiley: smile
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/1744740/
#38 May 04 2009 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
**
950 posts
Vataro, Eater of Souls wrote:
The movie was silly and was worth nothing plot-wise. However, it kept me mildly entertained most of the time so it was worth the $4.50 I spent to see it. Smiley: smile
I liked it for what it was, a corny action flick, as I'm sure most people who didn't read the comics see it. It was not, however, worth my $10.50. I haven't gone to the movies in a while and almost sh*t a brick when the ticket girl said how much it was.
____________________________
Rolento of Lakshmi:
75DRG 75BLM 74NIN 71BST

#39 May 04 2009 at 2:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
I just saw it in the theater, it's still a decent movie imo but flawed especially with how Deadpool's character is treated. There aren't all that many differences with the leaked version, some special effects naturally and those do add to the movie's enjoyment quite a bit.
____________________________


#40 May 24 2009 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
I enjoyed it till I realised that the man known here as Deadpool was turned from a very fanciable studmuffin into a freaky monster. Such a waste.

I'll forget the film in a short while but it was a worth a giggle.

Edited, May 24th 2009 6:44pm by GwynapNud
____________________________
I care because I'm a Tory
#41 May 26 2009 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
I can't stand deadpool, mostly because he was part of the destruction of a series I loved, the new mutants. Some idiot suit thought that the new mutants needed to be edgier, so they got rob liefield to butcher the art and introduce totally unneccesary characters who have long since died (yay feral, domino and shatterstar.) And he introduced cable and deadpool in that book, before it turned into x-force.

That soured me on him and marvel altogether. Seriously, sometime read new mutants 16-20 or so, they have a classic collection of it, and you see a very awesome character-driven series about young mutants growing up illustrated almost impressionistically by bill siencwitz. Then go read NM 100 and the early x-force books with lame-ass stryfe, everyone having two swords, snarling, and looking like a bad image comic.

So its personal to me.
____________________________
Retired.
#42 May 26 2009 at 10:50 PM Rating: Good
To be fair, Liefield butchered it before there was an Image Comics.

(& Domino is still "alive")

& Deadpool, starring Ryan Reynolds, has been announced.

Edited, May 27th 2009 2:50am by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#43 May 27 2009 at 1:45 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
The Neispace of Doom wrote:
I can't stand deadpool, mostly because he was part of the destruction of a series I loved, the new mutants. Some idiot suit thought that the new mutants needed to be edgier, so they got rob liefield to butcher the art and introduce totally unneccesary characters who have long since died (yay feral, domino and shatterstar.) And he introduced cable and deadpool in that book, before it turned into x-force.

That soured me on him and marvel altogether. Seriously, sometime read new mutants 16-20 or so, they have a classic collection of it, and you see a very awesome character-driven series about young mutants growing up illustrated almost impressionistically by bill siencwitz. Then go read NM 100 and the early x-force books with lame-ass stryfe, everyone having two swords, snarling, and looking like a bad image comic.

So its personal to me.


I thought I saw Feral in a recent comic somewhere? (I could be confusing with an older one though, I'm still working my way through a whole load of comics on the Marvel digital online site)


I never cared all that much for Cable, the whole "Executioner's Song" storyline was great though, never saw much of the New Mutants, apart from the very first comics.
____________________________


#44 May 27 2009 at 2:20 AM Rating: Good
Feral got killed, I think, in a recent arc of Wolverine.

It was either Sabretooth ot Wild Child, I forget.

Then Wolverine cut Sabretooth's head off.

Screenshot

It was neat.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#45 May 27 2009 at 10:01 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
******
27,067 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Deadpool, starring Ryan Reynolds, has been announced.


I'm not sure what deity I have to thank for this, but I'ma thank someone.
____________________________
Someone on another forum wrote:
Wow, you've got an awesome writing style.! I really dig the narrator's back story, humor, sarcasm, and the plethora of pop culture references. Altogether a refreshingly different RotR journal (not that I don't like the more traditional ones, mind you).

#46 May 28 2009 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,915 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Feral got killed, I think, in a recent arc of Wolverine.

It was either Sabretooth ot Wild Child, I forget.

Then Wolverine cut Sabretooth's head off.

Screenshot

It was neat.


Oh yeah, true. One of the last Wolverine stories I bought.

____________________________


Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 36 All times are in CDT
Jophiel, lolgaxe, Poldaran, Shaowstrike, Anonymous Guests (32)