angrymnk wrote:
I just proved you wrong I win anyway
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Je Suis Charlie
Je Suis CharlieFollow
I'm still waiting on you to answer the original request.
Almalieque wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
I just proved you wrong I win anyway
I already told you: you won. No need to wait for that anymore.
Your soul was made of fists.
Jar the Sam
Jar the Sam
Wait, what? Almalieque won something?
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
Kavekkk wrote:
Wait, what? Almalieque won something?
Smasharoo wrote:
I can't turn water into wine, and neither could old JC. We'd both be douchebags for claiming we could.
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
Smasharoo wrote:
Being ******* crazy and old isn't more credible than being ******* crazy and more recent.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Smasharoo wrote:
Being ******* crazy and old isn't more credible than being ******* crazy and more recent.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
gbaji wrote:
but from my perspective only a small percentage of theists are in the "push their beliefs on you and demonize you if you fail to comply" camp, while very close to 100% of atheists possess this particular personality trait.
You only know an atheist is an atheist if they talk about religion and an atheist that is talking about religion is going to tell you it's a fairy tale. Atheism isn't a choice you make, it's a lack of belief in religious fairy tales. A lot, and I mean a LOT, of people are atheists and don't even know atheism is a thing because it's kind of not a thing at all. A significant percentage of the people you know are probably atheists and you would never know because they have zero reason to talk about it, it's just not important to them, it's like discussing Snow White, or Little Miss Muffet, it's just not relevant to...anything so it doesn't cross their mind.
This means that anyone you know is an atheist probably has voiced an opinion that contradicts religion (which to religious people tends to mean "push their beliefs") in your presence. Your perspective is skewed by lack of a control group.
Atheists tend not to talk about their "beliefs" because "nothing" isn't a belief so how do you know who the atheists are?
Yodabunny wrote:
gbaji wrote:
but from my perspective only a small percentage of theists are in the "push their beliefs on you and demonize you if you fail to comply" camp, while very close to 100% of atheists possess this particular personality trait.
Atheists tend not to talk about their "beliefs" because "nothing" isn't a belief so how do you know who the atheists are?
gbaji has to be trolling. Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Penguins.
Edited, Jan 20th 2015 1:43pm by Smasharoo
Edited, Jan 20th 2015 1:43pm by Smasharoo
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
This means that anyone you know is an atheist probably has voiced an opinion that contradicts religion (which to religious people tends to mean "push their beliefs") in your presence.
I'm not sure what 'beliefs' is supposed to mean in this context. Not pretending that it's equally plausible that we lack a complete understanding of the universe or that, alternately, a magic invisible guy who knows everything decided how it works and told a few people a really long time ago isn't really a matter of "belief." Those aren't equally likely positions that both deserve respect. One is comically wrong and should be openly ridiculed and one is the basis for all of human progress since we gained the ability to think.
Edited, Jan 20th 2015 1:43pm by Smasharoo
I'm not sure what 'beliefs' is supposed to mean in this context. Not pretending that it's equally plausible that we lack a complete understanding of the universe or that, alternately, a magic invisible guy who knows everything decided how it works and told a few people a really long time ago isn't really a matter of "belief." Those aren't equally likely positions that both deserve respect. One is comically wrong and should be openly ridiculed and one is the basis for all of human progress since we gained the ability to think.
Edited, Jan 20th 2015 1:43pm by Smasharoo
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Yoda wrote:
Atheism isn't a choice you make, it's a lack of belief in religious fairy tales
Yoda wrote:
A lot, and I mean a LOT, of people are atheists and don't even know atheism is a thing because it's kind of not a thing at all. A significant percentage of the people you know are probably atheists and you would never know because they have zero reason to talk about it, it's just not important to them, it's like discussing Snow White, or Little Miss Muffet, it's just not relevant to...anything so it doesn't cross their mind.
This means that anyone you know is an atheist probably has voiced an opinion that contradicts religion (which to religious people tends to mean "push their beliefs") in your presence. Your perspective is skewed by lack of a control group.
This means that anyone you know is an atheist probably has voiced an opinion that contradicts religion (which to religious people tends to mean "push their beliefs") in your presence. Your perspective is skewed by lack of a control group.
Yoda wrote:
Atheists tend not to talk about their "beliefs" because "nothing" isn't a belief so how do you know who the atheists are?
Almalieque wrote:
This is your experience. I have people on Facebook that are attempting to be Facebook celebrities (posting several discussion threads a day) and literally spends at least 1/3 of their posts talking about how religion isn't real and how everyone are mental slaves.
Must be nice... all of my facebook feeds are filled with:
"STOP. SHARE THIS IF YOU KNOW JESUS WILL SAVE YOU. I KNOW 99% OF MY FRIENDS WILL NOT, BECAUSE THEY HATE JESUS."
Edited, Jan 20th 2015 7:41pm by TirithRR
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Tell them you only get one Share a day and it was either loving Jesus or hating cancer.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
And really, **** cancer
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Quote:
Everyone has a belief. Your failure to label it as such doesn't discount it. Atheists BELIEVE that the creation of all existence has a logical explanation that does not include people or things that we cannot prove.
No, there is no expectation that we can prove how existence came to be, but rather that it is highly unlikely that the method was that of the theist imagination.
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken. We can determine, however, that it is quite unlikely that it was broken by a dragon.
Just as Planned.
Tirith wrote:
Must be nice... all of my facebook feeds are filled with:
"STOP. SHARE THIS IF YOU KNOW JESUS WILL SAVE YOU. I KNOW 99% OF MY FRIENDS WILL NOT, BECAUSE THEY HATE JESUS."
Neither are nice, but annoying.
TLW wrote:
No, there is no expectation that we can prove how existence came to be, but rather that it is highly unlikely that the method was that of the theist imagination.
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken. We can determine, however, that it is quite unlikely that it was broken by a dragon.
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken. We can determine, however, that it is quite unlikely that it was broken by a dragon.
I share two friends with Jesus.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Timelordwho wrote:
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken.
Also a clue; is the glass on the inside or the outside?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
lolgaxe wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
In the same way that if you see a shattered window, there are many possibilities for how it occurred, but lacking a time machine it would be quite difficult to discern how it was broken.
Yeah, but presumably the dragon hid them and put a baseball there to test your faith.
Just as Planned.
Nonsense, you don't test faith.
Yodabunny wrote:
Nonsense, you don't test faith.
Almalieque wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
Nonsense, you don't test faith.
Huh?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
Huh?
It then becomes a race to the finish to see who is actually right. They all cannot and will not be right. They are motivated on what they believe is right. Only one prevails as being correct and we often hear about that individual and their success. We often don't hear about all of the other scientists who were wrong in their theories or all of the failed attempts (i.e. flawed theory/logic) from the successful scientists.
Recent Visitors: 405
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (405)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Je Suis Charlie
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC