Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A you trying to make me a feminist?Follow

#627 Oct 21 2014 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Jophiel wrote:
As mentioned way back upthread, the crescendo of stupid probably peaked with some idiot lecturing me on how I need to fight "gamers" by no longer considering a game's entertainment value as its primary worth but rather develop new criteria such as how socially relevant, edifying and healing the game was. Smiley: rolleyes
I think they're calling that "FullMcIntosh" now.

Edit: I haven't seen the video yet, but someone is saying Monica Lewinski is now talking about GG on CNN. Smiley: laugh


Edited, Oct 21st 2014 12:23pm by Poldaran
#628 Oct 21 2014 at 12:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
A thick skin is a good idea if you're going to have an online presence, but at some point internet asshattery does trickle into real life.
I don't disagree. I just disagree that it's a gendered issue, regardless of how many Time opinion articles someone wants to link, especially ones that include that 1 in 5 "statistic".
Even if the harassment is equal it'd likely still be a gendered issue. Men tend to be azholes to each other almost casually, but that behavior usually stops at gender boundaries. I mean we're supposed to butt heads with each other and the winner gets to mate with the women right? They're not supposed to be butting heads too.

When those boundaries go down stepping on toes is almost inevitable. I mean, try to portray a woman in a video game these days without having your work put under a fine toothed comb. Likewise try to be a woman entering this "man's world" without stepping on toes. Regardless of whether or not there's more of it society is going to react more strongly to the female harassment. People are just programmed to do so. TBH I think some of the extra harassment of women stems from the difficulty of bringing women into the fold. It does complicate things in the transition phase.

Edited, Oct 21st 2014 11:28am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#629 Oct 21 2014 at 12:51 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I, on the other hand, just got a hate message for being a gay feminist from a gamergate prick on my personal blog. SOOOO, I'm gonna go with gamergaters are misogynistic douchebags. Smiley: lol

Some less than others, sure. But frankly, if you can't see the GLARING link between the two, I don't think it would be possible to explain. It's like when gbaji says **** that would make conservatives roll their eyes.

And if you're choosing to align yourself with the movement, even if you only care about the journalistic aspect as it exists in ungendered space, you're still choosing to align yourself with a grossly misogynistic movement being led by an openly misogynistic ****. So you don't get excused.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#630 Oct 21 2014 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
idiggory wrote:
And if you're choosing to align yourself with the movement, even if you only care about the journalistic aspect as it exists in ungendered space, you're still choosing to align yourself with a grossly misogynistic movement being led by an openly misogynistic ****. So you don't get excused.
I love how people keep trying to say Gamergate has a leader. It's like you've all gone FullMcIntosh.
#631 Oct 21 2014 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I can still be a misogynistic douchebag without playing video games though, right?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#632 Oct 21 2014 at 1:04 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
idiggory wrote:
I, on the other hand, just got a hate message for being a *** feminist from a gamergate prick on my personal blog. SOOOO, I'm gonna go with gamergaters are misogynistic douchebags. Smiley: lol
You accused me of being a misogynist a page or so ago. SOOOOO, that means you're a misogynistic douchebag?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#633 Oct 21 2014 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
I love how people keep trying to say Gamergate has a leader. It's like you've all gone FullMcIntosh.


Fine, the guy who sparked all the fedora-wearing basement dwellers into a mob.

Quote:
SOOOOO, that means you're a misogynistic douchebag?


Misogynistic, maybe. Douchebag, probably.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#634 Oct 21 2014 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
Quote:
Anyone that refers to Depression Quest as a game is certainly worth questioning.


It is, isn't it? I've never played it, but from a cursory look at the mechanics it sounds like a management sim only with a depressed dude rather than a theme park or a zoo. Are you sure it isn't just a /bad/ game?

Now, if we were talking about Dear Esther, I'd see your point.
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#635 Oct 21 2014 at 1:18 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Elinda wrote:
I could discuss the obvious yet completely overlooked total absence of heroic crotch bulges.
From a strictly business stand point, I don't think there is enough of a market for an MMO with big breasted women with huge crotch bulges.


It would probably sell millions of copies.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#636 Oct 21 2014 at 1:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I know, with absolute certainty, that there is no point in talking to someone who views "feminist" as a pejorative term.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#637 Oct 21 2014 at 1:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kavekkk wrote:
It is, isn't it? I've never played it, but from a cursory look at the mechanics it sounds like a management sim only with a depressed dude rather than a theme park or a zoo. Are you sure it isn't just a /bad/ game?

It's more of a Choose Your Own Adventure with an internal point keeping mechanic. I'm not going to argue over the definition of "game" and will just say it's a very poor game.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#638 Oct 21 2014 at 1:37 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I love how people keep trying to say Gamergate has a leader. It's like you've all gone FullMcIntosh.


Your founder remains your leader until he is replaced.

Since he quit his job to gamergate full-time, I'm not going to hold my breath.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#639 Oct 21 2014 at 1:48 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Kavekkk wrote:
It is, isn't it? I've never played it, but from a cursory look at the mechanics it sounds like a management sim only with a depressed dude rather than a theme park or a zoo. Are you sure it isn't just a /bad/ game?
It's more of a Choose Your Own Adventure with an internal point keeping mechanic. I'm not going to argue over the definition of "game" and will just say it's a very poor game.
It's basically a geocities page made by an excitable thirteen year old.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#640 Oct 21 2014 at 1:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Re-reading the "Gamers Are Dead" column that seemed to be the spark for that whole can o' gas, it's not hard to see where people would be offended:
Quote:
I often say I’m a video game culture writer, but lately I don’t know exactly what that means. ‘Game culture’ as we know it is kind of embarrassing -- it’s not even culture. It’s buying things, spackling over memes and in-jokes repeatedly, and it’s getting mad on the internet.

It’s young men queuing with plush mushroom hats and backpacks and jutting promo poster rolls. Queuing passionately for hours, at events around the world, to see the things that marketers want them to see. To find out whether they should buy things or not. They don’t know how to dress or behave. Television cameras pan across these listless queues, and often catch the expressions of people who don’t quite know why they themselves are standing there.

‘Games culture’ is a petri dish of people who know so little about how human social interaction and professional life works that they can concoct online ‘wars’ about social justice or ‘game journalism ethics,’ straight-faced, and cause genuine human consequences. Because of video games.

Really? That's what you think 'games culture' is? A bunch of socially retarded misfits who can't dress themselves raging on the internet and spending money? Not the benign banter between gamers on the internet or MMORPG guilds that last for years and inspire real-life meetings or modding communities or indie game jams or fan art communities or long discussions about the ending of Bioshock Infinite or Spec Ops: The Line or the umpteen charity drives or the enormous Let's Play community or any of the rest of it? Just a bunch of feeble-minded corporate sheep who don't understand "social interaction", that's gaming culture. Why, she can't even understand why she's a part of it.

God, I can't imagine why anyone would have been offended by that glowing appraisal of how inclusive and diverse the gaming community is Smiley: laugh

Edited, Oct 21st 2014 3:34pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#641 Oct 21 2014 at 2:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Says the person posting in a "no holds barred" forum on the internet called the asylum, who frequently updates us on video game sales, and talks about backlogs of unplayed games.

Don't pretend you're not one of us.

Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#642 Oct 21 2014 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If I was a gamer, they wouldn't be unplayed!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#643 Oct 21 2014 at 2:14 PM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
That's not what kicked it off, though, is it? 'It' is why the article writer is mad, as we can see from the last paragraph.

I don't agree with the article as a fair representation of people who identify as gamers, but why anyone should particularly care what its author thinks does puzzle me somewhat. If only I had this ability to antagonise people.
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#644 Oct 21 2014 at 2:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I was referring directly to OV's claim:
Quote:
The whole "death of gamers" articles was about how "gamers" have become diversified and the definition of a "gamer" is now more varied than the stereotypical South Park WOW guy.

Unfortunately, the stereotypical South Park WOW guys saw that as a threat to them

The "Gamers are Dead" article that sparked a day's worth of like-minded columns wasn't anything like that and it's easy to see why it (and the subsequent columns) threw gas on the fire and brought a lot more "neutral" gamers into it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#645 Oct 21 2014 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
The "Gamers are Dead" article that sparked a day's worth of like-minded columns wasn't anything like that and it's easy to see why it (and the subsequent columns) threw gas on the fire and brought a lot more "neutral" gamers into it.


Here's the article you quoted above.

Here's more content from said article:

You don’t want to ‘be divisive?’ Who’s being divided, except for people who are okay with an infantilized cultural desert of ****** behavior and people who aren’t? What is there to ‘debate’?

Right, let’s say it’s a vocal minority that’s not representative of most people. Most people, from indies to industry leaders, are mortified, furious, disheartened at the direction industry conversation has taken in the past few weeks. It’s not like there are reputable outlets publishing rational articles in favor of the trolls’ ‘side’. Don’t give press to the harassers. Don’t blame an entire industry for a few bad apples.

Yet disclaiming liability is clearly no help. Game websites with huge community hubs whose fans are often associated with blunt Twitter hate mobs sort of shrug, they say things like ‘we delete the really bad stuff, what else can we do’ and ‘those people don’t represent our community’ -- but actually, those people do represent your community. That’s what your community is known for, whether you like it or not.

When you decline to create or to curate a culture in your spaces, you’re responsible for what spawns in the vacuum. That’s what’s been happening to games...

Yet in 2014, the industry has changed. We still think angry young men are the primary demographic for commercial video games -- yet average software revenues from the commercial space have contracted massively year on year, with only a few sterling brands enjoying predictable success.

It’s clear that most of the people who drove those revenues in the past have grown up -- either out of games, or into more fertile spaces, where small and diverse titles can flourish, where communities can quickly spring up around creativity, self-expression and mutual support, rather than consumerism. There are new audiences and new creators alike there. Traditional “gaming” is sloughing off, culturally and economically, like the carapace of a bug.

This is hard for people who’ve drank the kool aid about how their identity depends on the aging cultural signposts of a rapidly-evolving, increasingly broad and complex medium. It’s hard for them to hear they don’t own anything, anymore, that they aren’t the world’s most special-est consumer demographic, that they have to share.

These straw man ‘game journalism ethics’ conversations people have been having are largely the domain of a prior age, when all we did was negotiate ad deals and review scores and scraped to be called ‘reporters’, because we had the same powerlessness complex as our audience had. Now part of a writer’s job in a creative, human medium is to help curate a creative community and an inclusive culture -- and a lack of commitment to that just looks out-of-step, like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion.

Developers and writers alike want games about more things, and games by more people. We want -- and we are getting, and will keep getting -- tragicomedy, vignette, musicals, dream worlds, family tales, ethnographies, abstract art. We will get this, because we’re creating culture now. We are refusing to let anyone feel prohibited from participating.

“Gamer” isn’t just a dated demographic label that most people increasingly prefer not to use. Gamers are over. That’s why they’re so mad.

These obtuse ************* these wailing hyper-consumers, these childish internet-arguers -- they are not my audience. They don’t have to be yours. There is no ‘side’ to be on, there is no ‘debate’ to be had.

There is what’s past and there is what’s now. There is the role you choose to play in what’s ahead.


It shouldn't have thrown "gas on the fire". "Gamers" are more diverse & that is no more a threat to traditional gamers than gay marriage is to "traditional" marriage aficionados.

Edited, Oct 21st 2014 7:25pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#646 Oct 21 2014 at 5:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Right. Great job of cutting and pasting an entire column, terrible job at showing it was anything but insulting.
Quote:
When you decline to create or to curate a culture in your spaces, you’re responsible for what spawns in the vacuum
[...]
We want -- and we are getting, and will keep getting -- tragicomedy, vignette, musicals, dream worlds, family tales, ethnographies, abstract art. We will get this, because we’re creating culture now.


Again: You people in gaming culture are a bunch of mentally retarded, socially dysfunctional corporate shills who can't function in the real world or hold real jobs. It's up to us to insert a culture where you have none because, when I look at you, all I see is mouth-breathing morons with Pikachu backpacks waiting to buy the next game if you don't choke to death on your own drool first.

Yeah, real inclusive and uplifting stuff.

Edited, Oct 21st 2014 6:36pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#647 Oct 21 2014 at 5:30 PM Rating: Decent
If I was a gamergate troll I would have probably nerd raged.

I'm not though, so I didn't.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#648 Oct 21 2014 at 5:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Omegavegeta wrote:
If I was a gamergate troll I would have probably nerd raged.

That's nice.

If I thought the column was defensible I probably would have defended it. It's not though, so I didn't.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#649 Oct 21 2014 at 7:36 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Elinda wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Or maybe an essay about how dwarfs are stereotyped and objectified in fantasy role-playing games. I can find lots of example.
Gnomes are worse, poor little things not my fault they're shaped like a football...

Write a piece ranking the tits on different types of elves across the MMORPG spectrum.
Sounds like free TERA advertising to me. How much are they paying you huh?

I could discuss the obvious yet completely overlooked total absence of heroic crotch bulges.


Looking at crotches makes you a gay homosexual in a gamer's eye.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#650 Oct 21 2014 at 8:57 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Again: You people in gaming culture are a bunch of mentally retarded, socially dysfunctional corporate shills who can't function in the real world or hold real jobs. It's up to us to insert a culture where you have none because, when I look at you, all I see is mouth-breathing morons with Pikachu backpacks waiting to buy the next game if you don't choke to death on your own drool first.

Yeah, real inclusive and uplifting stuff.


I thought it was, actually, unless you happen to be part of the vocal minority that's not representative of most people that plays video games.

Believe it or not, I'm a gamer. I'll be 33 next year and I had a Nintendo at 5 & built my first PC at 16. Not one of the stereotypical "gamer" terms used in that particular article to describe gamers or gamer culture bothered me at all. Some of them even apply to me. Sure, it was a bit mean but given that its a response to gamergate that isn't exactly surprising.

The problem is, I don't want to be considered a gamer anymore. Not because I don't play video games (Currently loving Alien Isolation & counting the days until Civ: Beyond Earth) but because the trolls like the asshole that started gamergate have made it a derogatory term.

A term I'm ashamed to be associated with because of a very vocal minority that can't take a joke, criticism, or foams at the mouth when a feminist points out the obvious about the copious amounts of cleavage in many games.

Honestly, given the current environment on the internet I'm surprised the person that wrote this article about Boob Armor killing or injuring the wearer hasn't gotten a death threat yet. Its Gawker media related AND ruins fanboys fantasies all over the internet at the same time.

Come on Poldaran, you should try and get that ******* lawyer from California to beat the author up for an anti-bullying charity. THAT'LL TEACH THEM!

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#651 Oct 21 2014 at 9:17 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Why should any group of people feel bad to be part of that group just because a small number of that group happen to be ********? Hell, if everyone did that then there would be no group you could feel good to be part of.

The only reason gamer is a derogatory term, in your opinion, would be because a group of people published a dozen articles using it as such.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 3509 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (3509)