Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Reducing CO2 Emissions: It's not about the Money.Follow

#77 Jun 12 2014 at 9:11 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
1. The argument by GW skeptics does not have anything to do with the graph the joke uses. It's a strawman, at best.

Yes, the argument is a straw man, at best. Fuck you suck at language.


Apparently, I touched a nerve or something. Whatever man.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#78 Jun 12 2014 at 9:12 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Apparently, I touched a nerve or something. Whatever man.

Hahaha, yes. YOU STRUCK A NERVE!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#79 Jun 12 2014 at 9:12 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
You're kidding right?
And you're the punchline. Going to stop doing everything and anything in your pitiful power to avoid answering the question, which I might remind you was a complaint you made about everyone else not a few days ago? What evidence in Iran was so important that we're out 27 VA hospitals?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#80 Jun 12 2014 at 9:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
1. The argument by GW skeptics does not have anything to do with the graph the joke uses. It's a strawman, at best.

Yes, the argument is a straw man, at best. Fuck you suck at language.

He's massively more qualified to talk about language than you, Smash.

You're wrong about the graph just as you were wrong the previous umpteen times you've tried the same line of debate, Gbaji. Which is fine and I don't intend to spend a lot of time on it. I only mention it so you don't take my post here and start crying about how I refused to talk about your post because I need to change the subject or whatever.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#81 Jun 13 2014 at 7:35 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
You're wrong about the graph just as you were wrong the previous umpteen times you've tried the same line of debate, Gbaji. Which is fine and I don't intend to spend a lot of time on it. I only mention it so you don't take my post here and start crying about how I refused to talk about your post because I need to change the subject or whatever.


I'm not wrong about the graph. Heck. It's not even a matter of debate. Both of the trend lines drawn are ridiculous. The difference is that I see that about both of them, while you don't. Think about that.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#82 Jun 13 2014 at 10:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
The difference is that I see that about both of them, while you don't. Think about that.

Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#83 Jun 14 2014 at 10:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I'm not wrong about the graph. Heck. It's not even a matter of debate. Both of the trend lines drawn are ridiculous. The difference is that I see that about both of them, while you don't.

This is a compelling argument, but really only when you're completely alone. I imagine before you posted you stood before a mirror smiling wryly saying "What you don't understand though, is that I see both of them!" and then held your hands to your eyes miming binoculars and whispered loudly "both of them!"

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#84 Jun 16 2014 at 7:19 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
This is a compelling argument, but really only when you're completely alone.
He has to convince himself first. Well, first people have to ask the questions he's comfortable with answering and then he has to find an answer he's comfortable with.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 261 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (261)