Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
And the thing is, Google also needs to establish their brand name, just like the companies advertising through them. Google has decided it doesn't want its brand associated with smut. I'm not surprised..
Then they need to stop providing search results for smut, or an image page that displays said smut without actually going to the website. Right now Google is known at "the best search engine to find **** with", unless there is another that is better than them.
Um, it's pretty widely known that Google is the worst search engine to find **** with. They've been very actively filtering out smut for a long while now.
They don't remove it entirely (well, the legitimate sites), but you need to be far more specific with your search terms to find it.
I searched "worst search engine to find ****" into both Google and Bing. Google's results were all about managing the hunt for child pornography and how the US rejects the idea of automatic **** filtering.
Bing's results were a whole bunch of **** sites, with a Huffington Post article halfway down the page about how **** is much harder to find with Google's increasingly stringent filtering mechanisms.
edit: don't remember the ??? code, don't particularly care. Edited, Feb 11th 2014 8:20pm by idiggory
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.