Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

"Natural Born Citizen"Follow

#27 Aug 21 2013 at 5:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
See? Told ya Gbaji would have the Birther arguments down.
Those aren't birther arguments Joph.

Sure, you just happened to have US citizenship law memorized because it made you more fun at parties. But, hey, if saying Democrats/Republicans! makes you feel better about your fringe conspiracy allies, knock yourself out Smiley: laugh

____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Aug 21 2013 at 6:36 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
34,982 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
That's what the law says.
Constitutionally the law states that the mother needs to be a US citizen and she needs to live in the US long enough. Kind of the reason why Obama, Cruz, and McCain are all eligible for presidency.


As I said, I don't know about Cruz, but Obama's mother had not lived in the US long enough. Which is why where he was born actually mattered. If his mother had been a year older when he was born, no one would have cared about what his birth certificate said.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#29 Aug 21 2013 at 6:40 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
34,982 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
See? Told ya Gbaji would have the Birther arguments down.
Those aren't birther arguments Joph.

Sure, you just happened to have US citizenship law memorized because it made you more fun at parties.


I've never made a single birther argument. I've never argued that Obama was born anywhere other than Hawaii as he claimed. What I have argued is against ignorant people who don't understand the law. So if I had to memorize US citizenship law, it's only because of the incredibly long list of people who repeatedly managed to "forget" what the law says every time the subject came up and I had to remind them.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Aug 21 2013 at 6:41 PM Rating: Good
******
49,821 posts
gbaji wrote:
As I said, I don't know about Cruz, but Obama's mother had not lived in the US long enough.
So is Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Washington, Hawaii (which was a state when she and her family moved there) or California not part of the US?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#31 Aug 21 2013 at 6:49 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
3,403 posts
gbaji wrote:
that child would have little connection/loyalty to the US because it's never lived there and it's mother never lived there as an adult and thus has limited ability to pass on the culture, ideas, etc to the child.


Oh, now Gbaji is claiming Americans have culture. What are we, FRENCH? Smiley: lol
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#32 Aug 21 2013 at 6:57 PM Rating: Good
******
49,821 posts
The law gbaji is trying to imply is about abroad births, by the way. It requires required* the citizen parent to have lived in the US for ten years prior to the child's birth, and five of those needed to be after being 14. But seeing as how Hawaii does happen to be, and was at the time of birth, a US state and in fact not abroad, this is pure unadulterated birther conspiracy he either won't admit to or just go silent on.

* It was changed in 1986 to only require five years, and only two of which after 14.

Edited, Aug 21st 2013 9:01pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#33 Aug 21 2013 at 7:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,399 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Americans have culture



Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#34 Aug 21 2013 at 8:09 PM Rating: Good
****
6,758 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Does a clone count as a naturally born citizen? if so, can sheep run for president?


Yep, but they have to live to age 35, which is a little challenging for sheep.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#35 Aug 21 2013 at 9:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,913 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
As I said, I don't know about Cruz, but Obama's mother had not lived in the US long enough.
So is Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Washington, Hawaii (which was a state when she and her family moved there) or California not part of the US?


Nope, we Washingtonians seceeded and forgot to tell the rest of you. All Hail Washingtonia!

Also we hijacked the pacific fleet nuclear subs. Sleep well tonight!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#36 Aug 21 2013 at 9:07 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,338 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Also we hijacked the pacific fleet nuclear subs. Sleep well tonight!
All our empty missile silos here make us feel naked now.Smiley: frown
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Last week, I saw a guy with an eyepatch and a gold monocle and pointed him out to Flea as one of the most awesome things I've seen, ever. If I had an eyepatch and a gold monocle, I'd always dress up as Mr. Peanut but with a hook hand and a parrot.
#37 Aug 21 2013 at 9:09 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,084 posts
this is pure unadulterated birther conspiracy he either won't admit to or just go silent on.

No, just seems like an arcane law that would have actually applied had Obama been born in Kenya. Nothing particularly conspiracish about it. What he won't admit to is finding the insane nutbag idea that Obama was born in Kenya (and that it was covered up meticulously in all ways SINCE HIS BIRTH because someone was aware that this arcane law would preclude him from becoming the first black president 45 years later) anything but laughable, That's flat earth crazy. Gbaji found the idea terribly interesting and intriguing, made multiple posts about it, insisted it would be resolved by SCOTUS years ago, and even linked a tape in Swahili that was translated apparently without anyone who spoke Swahili listening to it. I remember the last part pretty clearly because I was laughing at the translation as I was listening to it. It was along the lines of "I love my mother" being translated as "All Father's MUST DIE!"

Edited, Aug 21st 2013 11:11pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#38 Aug 22 2013 at 12:02 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,518 posts
gbaji wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
That's what the law says.
Constitutionally the law states that the mother needs to be a US citizen and she needs to live in the US long enough. Kind of the reason why Obama, Cruz, and McCain are all eligible for presidency.


As I said, I don't know about Cruz, but Obama's mother had not lived in the US long enough. Which is why where he was born actually mattered. If his mother had been a year older when he was born, no one would have cared about what his birth certificate said.

18 isn't long enough? Was that not the age of adulthood back in '61?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#39 Aug 22 2013 at 1:21 AM Rating: Good
Sage
**
670 posts
Debalic wrote:
gbaji wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
gbaji wrote:
That's what the law says.
Constitutionally the law states that the mother needs to be a US citizen and she needs to live in the US long enough. Kind of the reason why Obama, Cruz, and McCain are all eligible for presidency.


As I said, I don't know about Cruz, but Obama's mother had not lived in the US long enough. Which is why where he was born actually mattered. If his mother had been a year older when he was born, no one would have cared about what his birth certificate said.

18 isn't long enough? Was that not the age of adulthood back in '61?

Nah, because back when it was written, they were only considered 10-11 years old. This is because the baby has black blood, and therefore the 3/5's personage takes effect. The mother would have to be 30 in this particular case.
#40 Aug 22 2013 at 7:41 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
gbaji wrote:
If his mother had been a year older when he was born, no one would have cared about what his birth certificate said.

Oh, here I thought people were concerned that he wasn't a us citizen, didn't represent the us, didn't think like an american, was anti-us, was a dirty foreign muslim etc etc.

But here it's only a problem with his mothers age when he was born. So, why again is it an issue?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#41 Aug 22 2013 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
And how, exactly, would his birth certificate have been relevant?
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#42 Aug 22 2013 at 8:24 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,821 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
No, just seems like an arcane law that would have actually applied had Obama been born in Kenya.
Of course trying to apply the abroad laws on in-country births is a conspiracy theory attempt. It's just not a particularly good one that requires, par for the course, that the audience it's being fed to being unable or unwilling to look up the information for themselves. You know? Like our free thinking, logic loving, sensible friend here.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#43 Aug 26 2013 at 3:15 AM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
34,982 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
this is pure unadulterated birther conspiracy he either won't admit to or just go silent on.

No, just seems like an arcane law that would have actually applied had Obama been born in Kenya. Nothing particularly conspiracish about it.


Yet, even after the law in question is detailed we *still* have folks saying silly things like "isn't 18 old enough?". Not according to the law, it's not.


Quote:
What he won't admit to is finding the insane nutbag idea that Obama was born in Kenya (and that it was covered up meticulously in all ways SINCE HIS BIRTH because someone was aware that this arcane law would preclude him from becoming the first black president 45 years later) anything but laughable, That's flat earth crazy.


Except no cover up was necessary. Being born in Kenya would not prevent him from being a citizen. It would only mean he wasn't a natural born citizen, which, as I've explained numerous times only matters if someone's trying to become president of the US. All the places he lived, jobs he had, including in the state legislature in Illinois, and then the US senate, did not require that he be a natural born citizen. Thus, there would have never been any reason to check if he'd actually been born in Kenya and his mom later filled out he paperwork to get a birth certificate for him in Hawaii, or if he was born in Hawaii.

In precisely the same way no one checked the birth certificate of our previous governor in California to see if he was born outside the US. Because... wait for it... it doesn't matter. Unless one is running for President of the US. Which Obama was.


My problem with this issue was never based on a belief that Obama was in fact born outside the US, but the fact that we apparently have absolutely no process by which a determination of that criteria to be president can be made. In Obama's case we can all look at people who believe that he was born in Kenya and laugh at them, but those are questions of merit (is there sufficient evidence that he was not born in the US?). But because of all those judges who dismissed the cases on standing instead of merit we now have judicial precedent which says that no US citizen can challenge that requirement of a president when his name in on the ballot. And no US citizen can challenge that requirement if that person wins the election. And no US citizen can challenge that requirement once the electoral college has voted. And no US citizen can challenge that requirement even after that person takes office.

Which effectively means that because of a bunch of judges more concerned with protecting a candidate's sealed records from what could fairly be labeled a fishing expedition, we have no method to address this within our laws. Yet, it's actually written into the US constitution. IMO, the desire to make this into a political rather than legal issue did great harm to our system of laws. Sure, it's fun to yukk it up at the birthers, but sometimes even silly claims need to be taken seriously enough to at least use the law properly to oppose them. All it would have taken was one judge to simply order the documents opened, take a look at them, and then rule that the documents proved natural born citizenship, and the whole issue would have been done. That's how it should have been handled. By skirting the law in order to avoid even having to deal with the case, those judges set a horrible precedent.


When McCain's natural born citizenship status was questioned, he used an open procedure to get a finding from the US congress stating that he met the criteria. He did this deliberately and ahead of time to ensure that no such questions would come up. Obama chose to do the exact opposite. That alone speaks volumes IMO.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#44 Aug 26 2013 at 7:12 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,821 posts
gbaji wrote:
Not according to the law, it's not.
It's also illegal to tie a giraffe's neck around a telephone pole in Florida. I mean, if you want to discuss random laws that are inapplicable to the situation you're trying to demonize, I'm all for that.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#45 Aug 26 2013 at 7:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
This reminds me of one of those "Intelligence vs Wisdom" examples from role playing games.

Intelligence allows you to write five paragraphs about how Obama supposedly should have handled the Birther situation (just stay with me on this). Wisdom would tell you that there's no way to write five paragraphs about Obama's birth certificate and how he/they did it all wrong and not sound like a kook.

Edited, Aug 26th 2013 8:38am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Aug 26 2013 at 7:43 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,821 posts
Failing both, he's using vitality and hoping to survive longer than the other guy.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#47 Aug 26 2013 at 9:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,399 posts
gbaji wrote:
But because of all those judges who dismissed the cases on standing instead of merit we now have judicial precedent which says that no US citizen can challenge that requirement of a president when his name in on the ballot without solid evidence.


Funny how that works. If you think someone is breaking the law, you need proof of it. What's the world coming to these days. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#48 Aug 26 2013 at 9:28 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,821 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Funny how that works. If you think someone is breaking the law, you need proof of it. What's the world coming to these days. Smiley: oyvey
No, if you think someone is breaking the law, you punish everyone accordingly. Having to deal with that evidence stuff is just getting the courts involved, which means more government intervention. And we're against big government.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#49 Aug 26 2013 at 9:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,399 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Funny how that works. If you think someone is breaking the law, you need proof of it. What's the world coming to these days. Smiley: oyvey
No, if you think someone is breaking the law, you punish everyone accordingly. Having to deal with that evidence stuff is just getting the courts involved, which means more government intervention. And we're against big government.
Seriously? And I just sold my extra-pointy pitchfork on Ebay too. Smiley: frown
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#50 Aug 26 2013 at 5:09 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
34,982 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
gbaji wrote:
But because of all those judges who dismissed the cases on standing instead of merit we now have judicial precedent which says that no US citizen can challenge that requirement of a president when his name in on the ballot without solid evidence.


Funny how that works. If you think someone is breaking the law, you need proof of it.


You have no clue how standing works in a civil case, do you? If the judge had looked at the evidence and ruled that there wasn't sufficient evidence to show that Obama didn't meet the criteria to be president, then that would be a ruling on "merit", not "standing". Seriously. Go look them up.

When you dismiss a case on standing, you aren't saying "this guy has insufficient evidence to show that his claim is true". You are saying "this guy can't show that he's harmed in any way even if what he's claiming is true". Which means that the same dismissal would be (or should be) applicable regardless of the probability that the claim is true. So if someone ran for president and everyone knew he wasn't a natural born citizen, but for some reason he was popular and a large number of people wanted him to win, the same inability to actually get him removed from the ballot, ineligible for EC votes, unable to be inaugurated, etc would apply.

That's the problem I have with those cases. They were clearly ruling on their assumption that the claims were not true, but dismissed the cases on standing instead (presumably to avoid having to actually go through the motions of proving the claims to be untrue). Which sets a really bad precedent.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#51 Aug 26 2013 at 5:40 PM Rating: Excellent
******
20,020 posts
And funny how there needs to be sufficient evidence of a crime to try it in the first place.

It's kinda why we don't just have murder trials just because someone cried murder. You need sufficient evidence of a crime to launch a criminal investigation. It's this nice side effect of not living in a fascist state where the government just assumes you're breaking the law.

Plus, Obama had a legally issued and valid birth certificate. His "original" birth certificate was legally meaningless. My sister is in the same position - the county that issued her birth certificate reissued all certificates printed during a certain span, and hers was one. I doubt she has the original document, because the original document is legally meaningless.

And my god, is there really so little going on nowadays that we're back to the birther argument?
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 1 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (1)