I suppose the good that can come out of this is the SCOTUS will have to set precedent on individual voting issues as being discriminatory or not. It just takes a long time for that to happen. In the meantime, many will be disenfranchised.
Most (if any) challenges won't get to SCOTUS. DOJ will be forced to bring probably hundreds of Section 3 challenges, how that will shake out remains to be seen.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- A SCOTUS Among Us
« Previous 0 Next »
A SCOTUS Among Us
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
« Previous 0 Next »
Recent Visitors: 307
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (307)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- A SCOTUS Among Us
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC