Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

TWA Flight 800Follow

#1 Jun 19 2013 at 5:45 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
New Conspiracy Documentary to air on Epix.

I kind of remember it all, but I was in 6th grade back in 1996, only 12 years old. My cable company recently added Epix to the standard HBO/Starz packages. I might actually watch it just to see what they have to say.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#2 Jun 19 2013 at 6:54 PM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Eh, it's probably nothing.
#3 Jun 19 2013 at 7:06 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Eh, it's probably nothing Aliens.

____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#4 Jun 19 2013 at 7:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
A man portable SAM, and most air to air missiles target heat sources. Specifically engine heat. A 747 gives off a tremendous amount of heat from it's engines, and at the time of that explosion, most commercial aircraft did not mount any form of missile countermeasure. A heat seaking missile would always hit a (relativly) slow moving airliner in one of the engines. The newer 2nd, third or fourth generation seaker heads which incorporate camera, laser and radar guidance are also programmed to aim for the engines, since that is invariably located close to the fuel cells and will usually explode with catestrophic force even in the event of a miss generated by pilot evasion. Electronic homeing anti-radar missiles would have hit the radar array in the nose or the cockpit avionics.

The cause of the aircraft crash was catestrophic structural failure resulting from an explosion in the central wing spar fuel tank. The surrounding metal clearly shows a traumatic force internal to that fuel cell, which radiated outward ripping metal open and out much like you would peel a bananna. The engines were all recovered remarkably intact and were not damaged by a primary explosion.

There is no way in hell that a missile hit that center tank with all the other jucy, more lucrative targets on the aircraft to choose from. Internal cargo hold bomb? maybe, but Boeing would have fought the blame if there was even a hint of it not being that faulty light. The fact that the fuel vapor ignition by faulty light tests boeing conducted after the fact resulted in ignition and detonation with a blast pattern almost identical to the recovered wreckage, and the fact that they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars per aircraft replacing those components out of their own pocket tells me that this is completely bogus. Also, it wasn't a ******* cessna that was flown into the pentagon either. Argh!!!!!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#5 Jun 19 2013 at 9:18 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Same thing.
#6 Jun 20 2013 at 2:56 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
So who can make a thrilling story out of a faulty light?
#7 Jun 20 2013 at 7:30 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
M. Night Shamalamadingdong.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#8 Jun 20 2013 at 8:22 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
I'd watch that! I never get tired of his twists. I think his worst one was the air one, although I can see what he tried to do.
#9 Jun 20 2013 at 9:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
The cause of the aircraft crash was catestrophic structural failure resulting from an explosion in the central wing spar fuel tank. The surrounding metal clearly shows a traumatic force internal to that fuel cell, which radiated outward ripping metal open and out much like you would peel a bananna. The engines were all recovered remarkably intact and were not damaged by a primary explosion.
Alien technology used to teleport the missile into the fuel tank.

Smiley: tinfoilhat
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#10 Jun 20 2013 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
There is no way in hell that a missile hit that center tank with all the other jucy, more lucrative targets on the aircraft to choose from. Internal cargo hold bomb? maybe, but Boeing would have fought the blame if there was even a hint of it not being that faulty light. The fact that the fuel vapor ignition by faulty light tests boeing conducted after the fact resulted in ignition and detonation with a blast pattern almost identical to the recovered wreckage, and the fact that they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars per aircraft replacing those components out of their own pocket tells me that this is completely bogus

Sure, THE MAN told you all that. Of course they're going to create a plausible cover story, not everyone has ingested enough fluoride for the neurotransmitters to take hold.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11 Jun 20 2013 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
The cause of the aircraft crash was catestrophic structural failure resulting from an explosion in the central wing spar fuel tank. The surrounding metal clearly shows a traumatic force internal to that fuel cell, which radiated outward ripping metal open and out much like you would peel a bananna. The engines were all recovered remarkably intact and were not damaged by a primary explosion.
Alien technology used to teleport the missile into the fuel tank.

Smiley: tinfoilhat


Little did we know that a Gouald was on that flight.

____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#12 Jun 25 2013 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
There is no way in hell that a missile hit that center tank with all the other jucy, more lucrative targets on the aircraft to choose from. Internal cargo hold bomb? maybe, but Boeing would have fought the blame if there was even a hint of it not being that faulty light. The fact that the fuel vapor ignition by faulty light tests boeing conducted after the fact resulted in ignition and detonation with a blast pattern almost identical to the recovered wreckage, and the fact that they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars per aircraft replacing those components out of their own pocket tells me that this is completely bogus

Sure, THE MAN told you all that. Of course they're going to create a plausible cover story, not everyone has ingested enough fluoride for the neurotransmitters to take hold.


And for those who have, there's always tin foil! Smiley: schooled
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 263 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (263)