Lord, the groupthink is strong in this one.
I basically said that very same thing.
The thing about intelligence though, it's worthless except in application. If you're so intelligent that you can accomplish nothing and relate to no one, you aren't really that intelligent at all, regardless of what some flawed test might tell you. Being good at a test doesn't mean being good at life. Being good at life, in case you haven't noticed, is a way more useful thing than scoring high on a test. In other worlds, it's nothing to boast about.
No, unfortunately I'm really left to three fundamental conclusions:
1. People don't believe me, which is unfounded, especially because I'm nearly pathologically honest.
2. People honestly don't understand what I'm saying, because their reading comprehension is that impaired or the concepts are too difficult.
3. People really just aren't bothering to read at all, and forming a snap judgment.
I think I'll choose to just chalk this up to general laziness, as it seems that most of you just really aren't bothering to read the thread.
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...
Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.
Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.