Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
That thing is broken. I only got 135.
I got about 2/3rds the way through, then my phone started ringing off the hook with various computer problems, and I didn't finish. Guess I shouldn't have done it from work.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- **** your autistic kid, I'm tired of hearing about him.
**** your autistic kid, I'm tired of hearing about him.Follow
I got about 2/3rds the way through, then my phone started ringing off the hook with various computer problems, and I didn't finish. Guess I shouldn't have done it from work.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
I was patching servers, so my brain wasn't really there anyways heh.
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
I took that thing 3 times and my score got progressively worse from 130 down to 110. I'm therefore convinced that attempting to test one's intelligence by their ability to discern patterns in such a way is mind numbing.
Timelordwho wrote:
This isn't a court of law. There is no reason to have an implicit assumption of truth in others statements. Putting the burden of disproving anything said by anyone on everyone except the person making the statement unfairly lowers the valuation of truth in the conversation. You've been fairly persistent in this notion, over the years and I thought it might be wise to reassess your method of evaluating these sorts of constructs. I can't quite tell whether or not this will be fundamentally better for you, but I do think it would be valuable to you.
There's an important distinction in novel writing between the author telling the reader something about a character, and showing/demonstrating to the reader something about a character. Telling instead of showing is usually an Author Fail. In life, telling instead of demonstrating is also suspect. However, often in time constraints, telling is all you have. It takes time to demonstrate who you are. Just because I accept a "Tell" doesn't mean I'm not reserving judgment pending demonstration. I have a LOT of time to fill. My condition is steadily worsening over time. I literally can barely move. It's not an insulin problem, it's a Mitochondrial ATP Krebb's cycle problem where my ATP breaks instead of being recycled, and then that cell is out of commission for four days, or dies. No ATP, no sugar burn for energy. And thinking or emoting hits my energy deficit worse than physical movement. Mental jobs requiring speed and accuracy are just as out as physical jobs. So I have a lot of time on my hands to waste or find a meaningful life to live with, with not enough energy resources, and all my money going on medicals and their consequences. I have SO much time for demonstration. But I'm not going to get a demonstration if I alienate a person in the first two minutes of interaction.
Edited, Mar 26th 2013 3:45am by Aripyanfar
I spent my time playing video games rather than taking online intelligence tests which I'm pretty sure means I'm smarter than all of you.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Debalic wrote:
Meh. 112, I rushed through it with a five year old harassing me. Does the mere existence, or presence of children affect your IQ?
Just add an extra 50 or 60 onto your score for good measure.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
D, F, B, G, A, H, B, E, H, A, C, F, B, D, H, E, F, C, E, D, G, A, B, H, B, A, H, G, E, A, D, E, G, G, C, F, H, F, B
18 minutes including typing the answers here, which probably took longer than solving.
Not a great test from a psychometric standpoint. No idea if answers are randomized or not, but given it's a ******** online test, I'd assume no. Feel free to impress your friends, assuming this sort of thing would impress them.
18 minutes including typing the answers here, which probably took longer than solving.
Not a great test from a psychometric standpoint. No idea if answers are randomized or not, but given it's a ******** online test, I'd assume no. Feel free to impress your friends, assuming this sort of thing would impress them.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Duuuude. I'm not surprised you can, but couldn't you spoiler it so everyone else's subsequent scores aren't suspect?
Self reported datum tends to be suspect regardless.
8 million.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Smasharoo wrote:
Feel free to impress your friends, assuming this sort of thing would impress them.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Allegory wrote:
Self reported datum tends to be suspect regardless.
It topped out at 145 IQ anyway. What use is that? Oh hey, you made scholar. Grats ^-^
Duuuude. I'm not surprised you can, but couldn't you spoiler it so everyone else's subsequent scores aren't suspect?
First of all, allegory's right, self reported data is allays fairly useless. Going by self reported data, lots of people have never *********** or even considered it, and women who are conservative politically ****** every time they have sex.
Secondly, if I can post the answers, and the test has been around with non randomized questions and answers for greater than...say an hour....the answers are somewhere else on the web. I didn't look for them, but I imagine it would be fairly trivial to find them.
There's a reason online tests aren't taken very seriously.
First of all, allegory's right, self reported data is allays fairly useless. Going by self reported data, lots of people have never *********** or even considered it, and women who are conservative politically ****** every time they have sex.
Secondly, if I can post the answers, and the test has been around with non randomized questions and answers for greater than...say an hour....the answers are somewhere else on the web. I didn't look for them, but I imagine it would be fairly trivial to find them.
There's a reason online tests aren't taken very seriously.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
D, F, B, G, A, H, B, E, H, A, C, F, B, D, H, E, F, C, E, D, G, A, B, H, B, A, H, G, E, A, D, E, G, G, C, F, H, F, B
18 minutes including typing the answers here, which probably took longer than solving.
Not a great test from a psychometric standpoint. No idea if answers are randomized or not, but given it's a bullsh*t online test, I'd assume no. Feel free to impress your friends, assuming this sort of thing would impress them.
18 minutes including typing the answers here, which probably took longer than solving.
Not a great test from a psychometric standpoint. No idea if answers are randomized or not, but given it's a bullsh*t online test, I'd assume no. Feel free to impress your friends, assuming this sort of thing would impress them.
Aripyanfar wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Self reported datum tends to be suspect regardless.
It topped out at 145 IQ anyway. What use is that? Oh hey, you made scholar. Grats ^-^
Too bad you guys posted this. It would have been slightly amusing when some posters came back with results above 150.
I took an online IQ test once in high school on the projector while sitting at my desk just as an exhibit to the class. I got 139. I also ****** usually at least 5 but up to 15 times every time I have sex.
I ****** 15 times every time I take an IQ test.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I usually ****** 14 times in the first half of the test, then get bored and quit.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
someproteinguy wrote:
I usually ****** 14 times in the first half of the test, then get bored and quit pull out.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
I usually take a test 15 tests every time I ******.
Come on now, do your best with that one...
Come on now, do your best with that one...
I'm a high achieving orgasmer.
It was hard growing up surrounded by peeps of lower ****** status, but I learned strategies to cope.
Now I'm comfortable with my gift.
It was hard growing up surrounded by peeps of lower ****** status, but I learned strategies to cope.
Now I'm comfortable with my gift.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
I'm a high achieving orgasmer.
It was hard growing up surrounded by peeps of lower ****** status, but I learned strategies to cope.
Now I'm comfortable with my gift.
It was hard growing up surrounded by peeps of lower ****** status, but I learned strategies to cope.
Now I'm comfortable with my gift.
Yeah, you always come in here, lording this supposedly great ****** ability over everyone, but whenever I propose that we test it out firsthand, you're all "Nah, I'd get bored."
BrownDuck wrote:
I usually take a test 15 tests every time I ******.
Come on now, do your best with that one...
Come on now, do your best with that one...
Sweety, if you go for monogamy you won't have to get tested so often.
I'm glad I've found a place where I can experience my orgasmic equals. Suddenly I'm not such a unique snowflake anymore and the world accepts me!
Aripyanfar wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
I usually take a test 15 tests every time I ******.
Come on now, do your best with that one...
Come on now, do your best with that one...
Sweety, if you go for monogamy you won't have to get tested so often.
This thread is finally starting to go places......
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
This thread is finally starting to go places......
That's what happens when you push it down a flight of stairs.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Recent Visitors: 329
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (329)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- **** your autistic kid, I'm tired of hearing about him.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC