·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Transgender rights
Transgender rightsFollow
Is this thread about Mindel's ****** yet?
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
lolgaxe wrote:
Joph likes big butts and cannot lie.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Almalieque wrote:
The measurement of a man's manhood by the number of women he sleeps with is widespread. You, my friend are a tool to accept such definition. Furthermore, it is also widespread to define a person's sex by their genitalia. So, I guess you really don't have a problem with that either. So, what again is your problem?
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 8:04pm by Rachel9
Rachel9 wrote:
So what word do you use for men who have not had sex (with a woman) before? Boy, i guess?
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 8:04pm by Rachel9
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 8:04pm by Rachel9
"Almalieque".
Rachel wrote:
I guess? But i've never encountered anyone who used the word "man" to refer only to people who have slept with at least x women. Certainly it's not uncommon for people to consider a man who has never had sex worthless, or something, but when someone just says the word "man", no one thinks they are only talking about someone who has slept with x number of women before. Maybe it's a regional thing though. So what word do you use for men who have not had sex (with a woman) before? Boy, i guess?
So, it's settled. You have no issue with defining a sex by their genitalia, because it's widespread.
Almalieque wrote:
I suck at...
Best choice of words in a thread mostly about wieners? I think we have a winner!
Torrence wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I suck at...
Best choice of words in a thread mostly about wieners? I think we have a winner!
Not sure why you would include "at".....
A swing and a miss....
Eske Esquire wrote:
Rachel9 wrote:
So what word do you use for men who have not had sex (with a woman) before? Boy, i guess?
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 8:04pm by Rachel9
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 8:04pm by Rachel9
"Almalieque".
******* /thread
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Almalieque wrote:
Rachel wrote:
I guess? But i've never encountered anyone who used the word "man" to refer only to people who have slept with at least x women. Certainly it's not uncommon for people to consider a man who has never had sex worthless, or something, but when someone just says the word "man", no one thinks they are only talking about someone who has slept with x number of women before. Maybe it's a regional thing though. So what word do you use for men who have not had sex (with a woman) before? Boy, i guess?
So, it's settled. You have no issue with defining a sex by their genitalia, because it's widespread.
Rachel9 wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Rachel wrote:
I guess? But i've never encountered anyone who used the word "man" to refer only to people who have slept with at least x women. Certainly it's not uncommon for people to consider a man who has never had sex worthless, or something, but when someone just says the word "man", no one thinks they are only talking about someone who has slept with x number of women before. Maybe it's a regional thing though. So what word do you use for men who have not had sex (with a woman) before? Boy, i guess?
So, it's settled. You have no issue with defining a sex by their genitalia, because it's widespread.
So WTF have you been arguing the contrary this whole time or would you like to expound on your problem?
Quote:
Transgender rights
Almalieque The Most Awesome wrote:
So WTF have you been arguing the contrary this whole time or would you like to expound on your problem?
It sounds like you're upset because transgenders are being treated as their biological sex and not some random gender/sex that they want to be. However, you have stated that you support widespread definitions. In this situation, it is widespread to label a transgender as their biological sex and not what they want to be. So, I ask again, what's your beef? What rights?
Quote:
some random gender/sex that they want to be.
Unfortunately i don't know how to explain it to someone who doesn't already understand, so i'm not sure where we can go from here.
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 10:18pm by Rachel9
Rachel9 wrote:
Quote:
some random gender/sex that they want to be.
Unfortunately i don't know how to explain it to someone who doesn't already understand, so i'm not sure where we can go from here.
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 10:18pm by Rachel9
If you can't explain something to someone who doesn't already know what the thing is, you are a very bad explainer.
Just as Planned.
Timelordwho wrote:
Rachel9 wrote:
Quote:
some random gender/sex that they want to be.
Unfortunately i don't know how to explain it to someone who doesn't already understand, so i'm not sure where we can go from here.
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 10:18pm by Rachel9
If you can't explain something to someone who doesn't already know what the thing is, you are a very bad explainer.
It's Alma. It doesn't matter how good she is.
Timelordwho wrote:
Rachel9 wrote:
Quote:
some random gender/sex that they want to be.
Unfortunately i don't know how to explain it to someone who doesn't already understand, so i'm not sure where we can go from here.
If you can't explain something to someone who doesn't already know what the thing is, you are a very bad explainer.
If you can't explain something to someone who doesn't already know what the thing is, you are a very bad explainer.
I don't understand.
I don't understand.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
So I have to know what something is already before I can have it explained to me?
Nadenu wrote:
So I have to know what something is already before I can have it explained to me?
I have a 100% success rate at explaining concepts to people who already understand them completely!
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
What the **** is wrong with Arizona?
Link
Link
The article wrote:
An Arizona state legislator wants to make it illegal for transgendered people to go to the bathroom. More accurately, the bill proposed by state Representative John Kavanagh would make it illegal to use public restrooms, dressing rooms, or locker rooms designated with the sex different from that on your birth certificate (which is inaccurate for most transgender people), an offense punishable by six months in jail. The bill’s vote was delayed yesterday after the committee meeting was disrupted by transgender activists and protestors, though Kavanagh said the delay was due to a “paperwork error.â€
According to the AP, Kavanagh is worried that anti-discrimination protections for transgender people being passed around the country will “serve as a cover for pedophiles who want to expose themselves to children of the opposite gender.†And his proposed law will supposedly protect businesses from the economic threats posed by transgender rights, such as the cost of installing unisex bathrooms and lawsuits from people pretending to be transgender just to sue local restaurants.
“This law simply restores the law of society: Men are men and women are women,†he reportedly said. “For a handful of people to make everyone else uncomfortable just makes no sense.â€
Assuming they actually feel uncomfortable. A transgender teen profiled by The New Yorker recently admitted there was “some awkwardness†about which bathroom he’d use after transitioning from female to male in ninth grade, “but when [he] started using the boys' rest rooms nobody said anything, and that was that.†If a bunch of high schoolers can handle it, surely the good patrons of Arizona's public restrooms can too.
According to the AP, Kavanagh is worried that anti-discrimination protections for transgender people being passed around the country will “serve as a cover for pedophiles who want to expose themselves to children of the opposite gender.†And his proposed law will supposedly protect businesses from the economic threats posed by transgender rights, such as the cost of installing unisex bathrooms and lawsuits from people pretending to be transgender just to sue local restaurants.
“This law simply restores the law of society: Men are men and women are women,†he reportedly said. “For a handful of people to make everyone else uncomfortable just makes no sense.â€
Assuming they actually feel uncomfortable. A transgender teen profiled by The New Yorker recently admitted there was “some awkwardness†about which bathroom he’d use after transitioning from female to male in ninth grade, “but when [he] started using the boys' rest rooms nobody said anything, and that was that.†If a bunch of high schoolers can handle it, surely the good patrons of Arizona's public restrooms can too.
Belkira wrote:
What the @#%^ is wrong with Arizona?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Belkira wrote:
What the @#%^ is wrong with Arizona?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
What the @#%^ is wrong with Arizona?
They probably have dictionaries over there.
They probably have dictionaries over there.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Rachel9 wrote:
Quote:
some random gender/sex that they want to be.
Unfortunately i don't know how to explain it to someone who doesn't already understand, so i'm not sure where we can go from here.
Edited, Mar 21st 2013 10:18pm by Rachel9
Nice attempt, but no cigar. I do know the difference, hence my intentional usage of the words. I used a "/" because what a person wants to be is irrelevant to the point of changing it. According to your logic, as long as it's wide spread, then it's an official definition. So, why does it matter if I'm referring to sex and/or gender. Does your "widespread" rule only apply to one and not the other? If not, then it's irrelevant.
It sounds like you're upset because transgenders are being treated as their biological sex and not some random gender/sex that they want to be. However, you have stated that you support widespread definitions. In this situation, it is widespread to label a transgender as their biological sex and not what they want to be. So, I ask again, what's your beef? What rights?
Quote:
Nice attempt, but no cigar. I do know the difference, hence my intentional usage of the words. I used a "/" because what a person wants to be is irrelevant to the point of changing it.
Recent Visitors: 354
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (354)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Transgender rights
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC