Jophiel wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Koalas kill more people in Australia each year than Great White Sharks.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The hills, they are lava...
The hills, they are lava...Follow
Well, duh. There's no fucking way a koala could kill a great white shark.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
There are also no sharks IN Austrailia, either.
Nadenu wrote:
There are also no sharks IN Austrailia, either.
Well yea....the Koalas took care of that.
quote phail...
Edited, Jan 11th 2013 2:56am by klausneck
Jophiel wrote:
Pack your own lunch and bring nothing but Pixie Stix and Pop Rocks and get your liberty on.
someproteinguy wrote:
Bait it into shallow water and let the tide do its thing?
That might not work either.
Nadenu wrote:
There are also no sharks IN Austrailia, either.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Just show them James Nachtwey photos. Beautiful photos for sure but also guaranteed nightmare material. No whitewashing, prettifying, undermining or devaluing there. Just lots of haunting photos of people who are all dead now.
Did you intend to provide this link instead?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Just show them James Nachtwey photos. Beautiful photos for sure but also guaranteed nightmare material. No whitewashing, prettifying, undermining or devaluing there. Just lots of haunting photos of people who are all dead now.
Did you intend to provide this link instead?
I dunno about you, but those two links lead to the same results.
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
In my browser, the first link goes to google images for "james nac", and has a bunch of random stuff that isn't at all haunting or about folks who've died.
As in, the first one goes here
Edited, Jan 15th 2013 4:36pm by gbaji
As in, the first one goes here
Edited, Jan 15th 2013 4:36pm by gbaji
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
In my browser the "James Nac" instantly redirects to Nachtwey and the two links end up showing identical results.
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
ITT: gbaji uses Netscape Navigator.
BonYogi wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Bait it into shallow water and let the tide do its thing?
That might not work either.
Wow. I haven't been wondering what happened to Corin Nemec...
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
TirithRR wrote:
In my browser the "James Nac" instantly redirects to Nachtwey and the two links end up showing identical results.
So if you go to www.google.com, then click on "images", and type "James Nac" into the field, you don't get a bunch of pictures having nothing to do with James Nachtwey? That's really strange. And unlikely, given that a search on "Nac" will result in all sorts of things that match that string other than just Nachtwey. The reason the link is broken is because one of the strings is "James Nac" instead of "James Nachtwey". So depending on which browser you use (or platform, not sure), it'll use that search string instead of the full one that was intended.
Edited, Jan 15th 2013 8:25pm by gbaji
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
If I personally go to Google and type in Nac it doesn't redirect. I do see the Nac vs Nachtwey in the two links, I'm not Bijou.
I assumed that the other pieces of the Google links in question contain some sort of Google related data. In fact, if you look at the first link, the string "James Nachtwey" is contained twice later in the link.
I just tested it out and if you type in "James Nac" but then use Google's auto-correcting/guessing list to do the actual search by choosing "James Nachtwey", you end up with a link that the first string is "James Nac" but it directs you to "James Nachtwey"
This link that I just created.
So what ever browser you are using is ******** up Google. But I've tested it in IE 9 and Firefox 18, the two I have on my computer right now and they both work as intended and redirect to James Nachtwey. So maybe you never actually clicked the link and just saw "James Nac" as the first string in the Google link and just assumed it was wrong and had to post the correction?
Edited, Jan 16th 2013 6:23am by TirithRR
I assumed that the other pieces of the Google links in question contain some sort of Google related data. In fact, if you look at the first link, the string "James Nachtwey" is contained twice later in the link.
I just tested it out and if you type in "James Nac" but then use Google's auto-correcting/guessing list to do the actual search by choosing "James Nachtwey", you end up with a link that the first string is "James Nac" but it directs you to "James Nachtwey"
This link that I just created.
So what ever browser you are using is ******** up Google. But I've tested it in IE 9 and Firefox 18, the two I have on my computer right now and they both work as intended and redirect to James Nachtwey. So maybe you never actually clicked the link and just saw "James Nac" as the first string in the Google link and just assumed it was wrong and had to post the correction?
Edited, Jan 16th 2013 6:23am by TirithRR
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
gbaji's not allowed to update from IE6.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
TirithRR wrote:
So maybe you never actually clicked the link and just saw "James Nac" as the first string in the Google link and just assumed it was wrong and had to post the correction?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Debalic wrote:
gbaji's not allowed to update from IE6.
This is the best forums debate ever. Five stars.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I was listening to some guy on the radio last night going on about how Google browser reinforces our biases.
If this is true then gbaji's links probably went too far right and fell off the internet.
Edited, Jan 16th 2013 9:23pm by Elinda
If this is true then gbaji's links probably went too far right and fell off the internet.
Edited, Jan 16th 2013 9:23pm by Elinda
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
TirithRR wrote:
I assumed that the other pieces of the Google links in question contain some sort of Google related data. In fact, if you look at the first link, the string "James Nachtwey" is contained twice later in the link.
Yup. I suspect it's a difference between what is actually typed into the google image search bar, and what google suggests as a search string.
Quote:
I just tested it out and if you type in "James Nac" but then use Google's auto-correcting/guessing list to do the actual search by choosing "James Nachtwey", you end up with a link that the first string is "James Nac" but it directs you to "James Nachtwey"
Interesting. Let me test this.
First, I'll type "James Nac" into the search bar, and the click the top suggested choice "james nachtwey": Link 1
Second, I'll type "James Nachtwey" into the google search: Link 2
Finally, I'll type "James Nac" into the google search, and hit enter instead of clicking any suggestion: Link 3
Quote:
So what ever browser you are using is ******** up Google.
I suspect It's other browsers putting additional information in there. My links correctly resolve for me (and are much shorter strings than yours).
Quote:
But I've tested it in IE 9 and Firefox 18, the two I have on my computer right now and they both work as intended and redirect to James Nachtwey.
I'm using Firefox 3.6.17.
Quote:
So maybe you never actually clicked the link and just saw "James Nac" as the first string in the Google link and just assumed it was wrong and had to post the correction?
No. I clicked on the link and was puzzled that the pictures I was seeing weren't from James Nachtwey. When I clicked the original link, I arrived at the same page as the one in Link 3 above. I didn't look at the url string until after I discovered that something was wrong.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
TirithRR wrote:
`I just tested it out and if you type in "James Nac" but then use Google's auto-correcting/guessing list to do the actual search by choosing "James Nachtwey", you end up with a link that the first string is "James Nac" but it directs you to "James Nachtwey"
This link that I just created.
This link that I just created.
Oh, btw. That link you created takes me here.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Elinda wrote:
I was listening to some guy on the radio last night going on about how Google browser reinforces our biases.
Twas my understanding. Unless you block their behind-the-scenes stuff somehow, they use your past browsing choices to flavor your search results.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Kindle is really annoying when I've finished a run of one genre, and feel like moving on to something completely different.
OMG I'M OVER THE GAY BONDAGE SHAPESHIFTER THREESOMES ALREADY.
OMG I'M OVER THE GAY BONDAGE SHAPESHIFTER THREESOMES ALREADY.
Recent Visitors: 404
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (404)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The hills, they are lava...
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC