Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
see, this is what your whole post boils down too. The rest is just verbal diarrhea and emotional **** on your part, which is unnecessary, and is why I don't take you seriously
So do you agree with what I said though? The rest of my posts exist because people keep insisting that I'm wrong, forcing me to write over and over and over again all the different arguments and examples and rationals supporting what I'm saying. If you agree with my statement that people don't spend money rationally, so we should not approach funding for things like food stamps as though they do, then we're good, right?
I don't agree with you.
Ok. Why? See. you keep saying "I disagree with you", and I keep waiting for the argument behind your position. I'm still waiting.
And if you didn't present everything as though you were the final arbiter of truth, I wouldn't have used that phrase.
If you don't agree with me, then present an argument in opposition to what I'm saying. Simply repeating "you're wrong" and "you're not the final arbiter of truth" over and over isn't an argument.
I have never once seen you concede a point, no matter how many facts have been thrown your way.
Facts are not arguments though. I'm waiting for an argument.
I am not even sure why I am bothering to type this.
Because you believe something, are sure you're correct, but see me saying something which does not match your belief. Nothing wrong with that at all. Ironically though, you attack my position by claiming it has the very weaknesses your own does (projection). Apply your own accusations to your own position. You have not presented any facts to support your position. You have not attempted an argument using those facts. You have simply declared yourself correct and me wrong over and over. Yet you keep insisting that I don't present facts, or data, or argument. You insist that I'm just arbitrarily declaring my position "true" and all others false.
Look in the mirror sometime. Better yet, try to meet the same standards you demand of me.