1. If any gun used for "assaulting people" should be labeled an "assault weapon", then why bother with the label? Hint: the label is used to scare people.
Yep, that would be true, completely irrelevant since that's not what I suggested, but true.
2. Any gun that fires any number of shots can be used for killing people. Similarly, any gun capable of being used to hunt can be used to kill people.
Yep, how many people can you kill with 3 round shotgun vs say an AR-15 in 10 minutes? When you buy an AR-15 you're not buying it to hunt with, you're buying it because it's a lethal human killing weapon with a badass looking profile.
3. The purpose of the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting anyway.
You have no idea how much I don't give a @#$% about your 2nd amendment. It's one of the most retarded excuses for retarded behaviour I've ever seen.
The purpose of the 2nd amendment was to allow militias to maintain firearms in defence of their communities in the event that government got out of control and started oppressing the people. 1. Which militia are you a part of? 2. Do you seriously think a bunch of hicks with guns have even the slightest of chances against the US military? 3. Is it even a concern in modern times? How oppressed do you really think you're going to be living in the US? People can read now, guns are no longer necessary to maintain your freedom, get over it.