gbaji wrote:
Slapping these together for relevance.
What actions of hers?
We can condemn his actions (and his wife certainly did), but she was clearly a participant in mutual flirtation.
someproteinguy wrote:
Samira wrote:
Quote:
It was her actions and admittedly the reactions of the employer that caused the problem.
What actions of hers?
atriclethingywhatever wrote:
At one point, Knight told Nelson that "if she saw his pants bulging, she would know her clothing was too revealing," the decision read.
We can condemn his actions (and his wife certainly did), but she was clearly a participant in mutual flirtation.
Protip: Knight was the male. Nelson was the female.
I'm not saying she never flirted or anything, but you're quoting the wrong statement if you're trying to make that point. Of course, mis-reading is par for the course in Gbajiland.