Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Fired for Being Too AttractiveFollow

#27 Dec 26 2012 at 3:48 PM Rating: Excellent
**
297 posts
[quote]I wouldn't agree you can just decide not to be attracted to people. I think the answer is to be committed to monogamy regardless, be honest with your partner, and don't act like an ************

This. I am a huge flirt but have told my girlfriend who I flirt with and know where to draw the line. When it starts on the eye candy becoming touchy or making comments about hooking up, it ends there.

This guy is an idiot, next girl he thinks is cute it will happen again. Needs to man up, let his balls drop and tell his wife she is hot now let go into the supply room.
#28 Dec 26 2012 at 6:08 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
atriclethingywhatever wrote:
At one point, Knight told Nelson that "if she saw his pants bulging, she would know her clothing was too revealing," the decision read.


Smiley: rolleyes

Also, for a thread about an attractive woman, there's a distinct lack of pictures here. Smiley: disappointed

Edited, Dec 26th 2012 8:13am by someproteinguy


You really aren't missing much. She isn't ugly but she isn't what one would call super hot. Average would be a good summation of her looks.

I am really torn on this. On one hand if she was dressing inappropriately and refused to wear less sexual clothing he could easily fire her for that. On the other he did carry a conversation on with her and let things slide for way to long. Sounds like he let his ***** think for him too much and now it is going to ***** him.
#29 Dec 26 2012 at 7:45 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Criminy wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
atriclethingywhatever wrote:
At one point, Knight told Nelson that "if she saw his pants bulging, she would know her clothing was too revealing," the decision read.


Smiley: rolleyes

Also, for a thread about an attractive woman, there's a distinct lack of pictures here. Smiley: disappointed

Edited, Dec 26th 2012 8:13am by someproteinguy


You really aren't missing much. She isn't ugly but she isn't what one would call super hot. Average would be a good summation of her looks.

She looks good for a woman in her forties.

Also, I assume Guenny is either some kind of robot with a kill switch for her libido that she can hit at will, or BT is some kind of sex god that can hit said kill switch several times a day. In my experience most people won't look at a hot person and not even think that they're hot unless they've repressed themselves in a rather unhealthy way (honestly, the only people* I've heard of who can do that are A) Rape victims who are totally anti-sex in any way, or B) Evangelicals raised in a Purity Culture where even thinking of holding hands condemns you to Hell and after years have numbed all their romantic feelings). YMMV.

*Or asexual. Kinda goes without saying.
#30 Dec 26 2012 at 7:58 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:

She looks good for a woman in her forties.

Also, I assume Guenny is either some kind of robot with a kill switch for her libido that she can hit at will, or BT is some kind of sex god that can hit said kill switch several times a day. In my experience most people won't look at a hot person and not even think that they're hot unless they've repressed themselves in a rather unhealthy way (honestly, the only people* I've heard of who can do that are A) Rape victims who are totally anti-sex in any way, or B) Evangelicals raised in a Purity Culture where even thinking of holding hands condemns you to Hell and after years have numbed all their romantic feelings). YMMV.

*Or asexual. Kinda goes without saying.


Aye she does but that really isn't saying much at all. There are a lot of women that look good in their 40s and a lot that don't. But I suppose that is just nitpicking over semantics.

Also my old man told me something when I started dating in high school. "Once you get married you can admire the flowers in the garden but you are no longer allowed to pick any of them, enjoy it while you can." I feel it is relevant to the situation at hand.
#31 Dec 26 2012 at 8:08 PM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
Criminy wrote:
Also my old man told me something when I started dating in high school. "Once you get married you can admire the flowers in the garden but you are no longer allowed to pick any of them, enjoy it while you can." I feel it is relevant to the situation at hand.


Nothing stopping you from a quick run through though.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#32 Dec 27 2012 at 2:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Criminy wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:

She looks good for a woman in her forties.

Also, I assume Guenny is either some kind of robot with a kill switch for her libido that she can hit at will, or BT is some kind of sex god that can hit said kill switch several times a day. In my experience most people won't look at a hot person and not even think that they're hot unless they've repressed themselves in a rather unhealthy way (honestly, the only people* I've heard of who can do that are A) Rape victims who are totally anti-sex in any way, or B) Evangelicals raised in a Purity Culture where even thinking of holding hands condemns you to Hell and after years have numbed all their romantic feelings). YMMV.*Or asexual. Kinda goes without saying.
Also my old man told me something when I started dating in high school. "Once you get married you can admire the flowers in the garden but you are no longer allowed to pick any of them, enjoy it while you can." I feel it is relevant to the situation at hand.

Or you could decide to be polyamorous or swingers. Smiley: sly
#33 Dec 27 2012 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Or you could decide to be polyamorous or swingers. Smiley: sly

You never miss an opportunity to be smug about your lifestyle do you? Smiley: lol

Smiley: thumbsup
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#34 Dec 27 2012 at 12:32 PM Rating: Good
LOL, I'm not being smug! Most people don't think about these things, so I'm just sharing my knowledge!
#35 Dec 27 2012 at 11:39 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Or you could decide to be polyamorous or swingers. Smiley: sly


Well yeah there is that. Smiley: laugh Not my cup of tea but I can definitely see why someone would enjoy that kind of set up.
#36 Dec 29 2012 at 1:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Most people don't think about these things

I'm fairly confident that the reason most people aren't swingers isn't because they're unfamiliar with the concept.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#37 Dec 29 2012 at 1:32 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Wait wait wait... so I could have sex with my primary partner, and also have sex with other partners?
#38 Dec 29 2012 at 1:34 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Spoonless wrote:
Wait wait wait... so I could have sex with my primary partner, and also have sex with other partners?


Just don't tell the old man on his death bed, no need to make his last moments nothing but regret.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#39 Dec 29 2012 at 1:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Spoonless wrote:
Wait wait wait... so I could have sex with my primary partner, and also have sex with other partners?

Here, take a pamphlet.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#40 Dec 29 2012 at 8:27 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Most people don't think about these things

I'm fairly confident that the reason most people aren't swingers isn't because they're unfamiliar with the concept.

True. But it's not like it's something that is socially acceptable or really talked about much aside from in a joking manner. I didn't really think about it until I stumbled across the idea on a feminist forum on myspace about 6 years ago.
#41 Dec 30 2012 at 2:27 AM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
Protip: Guys talk about it all the time. Your little "Grrl Power" thing is a man's wet dream.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#42 Dec 30 2012 at 5:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Protip: Guys talk about it all the time. Your little "Grrl Power" thing is a man's wet dream.


Some people really hate sharing.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#43 Dec 30 2012 at 8:08 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Protip: Guys talk about it all the time. Your little "Grrl Power" thing is a man's wet dream.


*Insert Demotivational Poster About "Male Lesbian Fantasy" vs "Lesbian Reality" Here*
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#44 Dec 30 2012 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good
Timelordwho wrote:
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Protip: Guys talk about it all the time. Your little "Grrl Power" thing is a man's wet dream.


Some people really hate sharing.

I think that's the crux of the issue right there. Most people don't like to share, especially if they've never thought of the concept of sharing before. When my boyfriend and I first got together around 5 years ago, I suggested the idea to him. He came from a very strict religious background (in fact he was still a virgin when we met), so it wasn't something he was ready to jump into. After we'd been together a year though, he brought it up again and said he was curious and wanted to give it a try. We had a bit of a rocky start, but overall it's been going well for us.
#45 Jan 02 2013 at 3:00 PM Rating: Decent
**
297 posts
Quote:
I think that's the crux of the issue right there. Most people don't like to share, especially if they've never thought of the concept of sharing before. When my boyfriend and I first got together around 5 years ago, I suggested the idea to him. He came from a very strict religious background (in fact he was still a virgin when we met), so it wasn't something he was ready to jump into. After we'd been together a year though, he brought it up again and said he was curious and wanted to give it a try. We had a bit of a rocky start, but overall it's been going well for us.


That is cool it worked for you. I just never got really into the relationship either time I tried. For my friend though has worked great. She has a husband and a bf. The guys are straight, one is questionably bi imo, and they have three sons. Not everyone's thing but it does work.
#46 Jan 02 2013 at 4:40 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Slapping these together for relevance.

someproteinguy wrote:
Samira wrote:
Quote:
It was her actions and admittedly the reactions of the employer that caused the problem.


What actions of hers?

atriclethingywhatever wrote:
At one point, Knight told Nelson that "if she saw his pants bulging, she would know her clothing was too revealing," the decision read.


We can condemn his actions (and his wife certainly did), but she was clearly a participant in mutual flirtation. Sometimes, it's not about looks specifically, but that two people "click". They catch the innuendos from the other, think similar (dirty) thoughts, and feed off each other in this way. It's a fun game initially, but over time this will tend to grow into something beyond just flirtatious comments if the breaks aren't put on at some point. And that usually requires not interacting with the other person so frequently. So while it seems unfair, when this happens between an employer and employee, termination may have been the only way to end this process.

Sucks and all that, but it's one of the reasons why you should maintain a professional demeanor at work. She clearly went well past "attractive employee being hit on by her boss", and became a participant herself. At that point, she lost any high ground she might have had. It's an unprofessional work relationship, and the boss can't fire himself.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#47 Jan 02 2013 at 5:50 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
Slapping these together for relevance.

someproteinguy wrote:
Samira wrote:
Quote:
It was her actions and admittedly the reactions of the employer that caused the problem.


What actions of hers?

atriclethingywhatever wrote:
At one point, Knight told Nelson that "if she saw his pants bulging, she would know her clothing was too revealing," the decision read.


We can condemn his actions (and his wife certainly did), but she was clearly a participant in mutual flirtation.


Protip: Knight was the male. Nelson was the female.

I'm not saying she never flirted or anything, but you're quoting the wrong statement if you're trying to make that point. Of course, mis-reading is par for the course in Gbajiland.
#48 Jan 09 2013 at 2:20 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
Protip: Guys talk about it all the time. Your little "Grrl Power" thing is a man's wet dream.


*Insert Demotivational Poster About "Male Lesbian Fantasy" vs "Lesbian Reality" Here*


Man, I looked for one, but they are all either too inappropriate to post or totally don't actually understand what lesbians are... Sigh.

1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 327 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (327)