Spoonless wrote:
Couldn't you argue that it's accurate, but not precise? Or am I confusing the two terms?
You would be correct.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Hand gun vs Chemical Weapon
Hand gun vs Chemical WeaponFollow
You would be correct.
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
rdmcandie wrote:
Spoonless wrote:
Couldn't you argue that it's accurate, but not precise? Or am I confusing the two terms?
You would be correct.
It's both less accurate and less precise, which is why you target things several orders or magnitude larger.
Just as Planned.
lolgaxe wrote:
This is my favorite thread where people with, at best, casual knowledge of weapons argue with each other with such intense fervor.
Next it will be sex.
bu dum bum.
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
gbaji wrote:
Um... No. I said that chemical weapons are the payload of choice for people who do not have accurate delivery systems *because* they do not need to be very accurate to be effective. Dude. Seriously?
So you agree that weapons of mass destruction or accurate?
Isn't that comparison the same with a knife vs a gun?
LolGaxe wrote:
This is my favorite thread where people with, at best, casual knowledge of weapons argue with each other with such intense fervor.
I do believe I said "Go ask a Field Artilleryman" several times. I'm not the one making up false accuracy stats.. I am a proud Signaleer
Edited, Dec 13th 2012 11:23pm by Almalieque
Claiming that a WMD is accurate because it totally kills the indiscriminate boatload of people that you intended it to is like claiming that McDonald's is an exclusive restaurant because they only let in the people they want to let in.
Eske Esquire wrote:
Claiming that a WMD is accurate because it totally kills the indiscriminate boatload of people that you intended it to is like claiming that McDonald's is an exclusive restaurant because they only let in the people they want to let in.
What?
I said that WMD is accurate because it fits the definition of accuracy. NO one has provided an actual definition that contradicts the accuracy of WMD only opinions on why they don't think it is.
Since when is hitting your target head on "not accurate"?
"If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck but it needs batteries, you probably have the wrong abstraction."
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
So...if i fire a.45 cal bullet with a poison gas payload into a room and kill everybody in it, was my shot accurate?
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Friar Bijou wrote:
So...if i fire a.45 cal bullet with a poison gas payload into a room and kill everybody in it, was my shot accurate?
No, since with your eyesight you would miss the room entirely.
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
So...if i fire a.45 cal bullet with a poison gas payload into a room and kill everybody in it, was my shot accurate?
No, since with your eyesight you would miss the room entirely.
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Friar Bijou wrote:
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
So...if i fire a.45 cal bullet with a poison gas payload into a room and kill everybody in it, was my shot accurate?
No, since with your eyesight you would miss the room entirely.
No, you need to hand the gun over to someone who can actually hit their target.
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100
"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
Shaowstrike the Shady wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
So...if i fire a.45 cal bullet with a poison gas payload into a room and kill everybody in it, was my shot accurate?
No, since with your eyesight you would miss the room entirely.
No, you need to hand the gun over to someone who can actually hit their target.
Give it to a Field Artilleryman. I hear they're pretty accurate.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Nexa wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
This is my favorite thread where people with, at best, casual knowledge of weapons argue with each other with such intense fervor.
Next it will be sex.
bu dum bum.
Are you saying you like it in da butt?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Almalieque wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Um... No. I said that chemical weapons are the payload of choice for people who do not have accurate delivery systems *because* they do not need to be very accurate to be effective. Dude. Seriously?
So you agree that weapons of mass destruction or accurate?
Do you seriously have the reading comprehension of a garden snail or something?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Almalieque wrote:
I do believe I said "Go ask a Field Artilleryman" several times. I'm not the one making up false accuracy stats.. I am a proud Signaleer
Hey guess what, I just called Doug, who is in fact a "Field Artilleryman", and he said you are full of ****, ****, and mandick wrapped in barbed wire and cleaning solvent. He got somewhat more emotional that I expected.
He still has aids.
Just as Planned.
Isn't that comparison the same with a knife vs a gun?
gbaji wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Um... No. I said that chemical weapons are the payload of choice for people who do not have accurate delivery systems *because* they do not need to be very accurate to be effective. Dude. Seriously?
So you agree that weapons of mass destruction or accurate?
Do you seriously have the reading comprehension of a garden snail or something?
Are you seriously incapable of answering a simple yes or no question or something? You're hiding behind befogging words.A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
Edited, Dec 14th 2012 1:54am by Almalieque
gbaji doesn't do "yes or no" without qualifiers. He hates to be rooted to a single reality.
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Almalieque wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Um... No. I said that chemical weapons are the payload of choice for people who do not have accurate delivery systems *because* they do not need to be very accurate to be effective. Dude. Seriously?
So you agree that weapons of mass destruction or accurate?
Do you seriously have the reading comprehension of a garden snail or something?
Are you seriously incapable of answering a simple yes or no question or something? You're hiding behind befogging words.A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
No, it wont. Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no answer only please.
My statement was quite clear: They (chemical weapons) do not have to be accurate to be effective. This is why they are popular for those who do not have accurate delivery systems. Was any part of that really confusing to you?
Edited, Dec 13th 2012 4:04pm by gbaji
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Friar Bijou wrote:
gbaji doesn't do "yes or no" without qualifiers. He hates to be rooted to a single reality.
I also hate it when people change the very specific and clear words I use and insist that I must either agree or disagree 100% with their modified version of what I said. He changed "chemical weapons" to the much broader "WMDs", then spoke about the payload being accurate instead of the delivery system, then asked me to agree or disagree with that garbage. There are a host of reasons I don't play that game.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
gbaji doesn't do "yes or no" without qualifiers. He hates to be rooted to a single reality.
I also hate it when people change the very specific and clear words I use and insist that I must either agree or disagree 100% with their modified version of what I said. He changed "chemical weapons" to the much broader "WMDs", then spoke about the payload being accurate instead of the delivery system, then asked me to agree or disagree with that garbage. There are a host of reasons I don't play that game.
Of course you play that game. You just cry like a baby unless you're on the other side of it.
gbaji wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
gbaji doesn't do "yes or no" without qualifiers. He hates to be rooted to a single reality.
I also hate it when people change the very specific and clear words I use and insist that I must either agree or disagree 100% with their modified version of what I said. He changed "chemical weapons" to the much broader "WMDs", then spoke about the payload being accurate instead of the delivery system, then asked me to agree or disagree with that garbage. There are a host of reasons I don't play that game.
Idiot.
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
Friar Bijou wrote:
HI. I wasn't talking about this subject, but all subjects you discuss.
I qualify my statements when people attempt to misstate them back to me. There happen to be a number of people who do this quite often. I can only surmise it's because they find it hard to argue against the things I actually say, so they feel a need to misstate what I say so as to make an easier target. Blame them when they do this if it bothers you, but I'm absolutely going to correct them and say "Nope. That's not what I'm saying" when they do. What other choice do I have? Just agree that I said something I didn't say? That seems kinda silly.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Friar Bijou wrote:
HI. I wasn't talking about this subject, but all subjects you discuss.
I qualify my statements when people attempt to misstate them back to me. There happen to be a number of people who do this quite often. I can only surmise it's because they find it hard to argue against the things I actually say, so they feel a need to misstate what I say so as to make an easier target. Blame them when they do this if it bothers you, but I'm absolutely going to correct them and say "Nope. That's not what I'm saying" when they do. What other choice do I have? Just agree that I said something I didn't say? That seems kinda silly.
People restate your argument back to you in the same way that therapists ask couples to restate statements between couples to make sure there is no communication error and you still say they got it wrong. Just like my ex....who was diagnosed bi-polar type 1.....hmmmmmmmm.
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
gbaji wrote:
I can only surmise it's because they find it hard to argue against the things I actually say
Good guess, but wrong
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
Debalic wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Next it will be sex.
bu dum bum.
bu dum bum.
She's saying she likes to sex the uneducated hobos. Like Smash.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 337
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (337)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Hand gun vs Chemical Weapon
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC