Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama's 75%Follow

#27 Nov 16 2012 at 12:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I want my fifty bucks but Varus is a typical broke-*** conservative pussy who talks big but won't pay up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Nov 16 2012 at 12:26 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I want my fifty bucks but fact is Varus is a typical broke-*** conservative pussy who talks big but won't pay up.
FTFY. It's not true unless you explicitly declare it a fact first.

Edited, Nov 16th 2012 1:26pm by Spoonless
#29 Nov 16 2012 at 12:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Fact is democrats want high unemployment and more illegal immigrants and more people on food stamps.

No no, we want to legalize all immigrants and register them to vote. It's the American way. Here's your bowl of soup and your voter registration card. Vote Tammany.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#30 Nov 16 2012 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Fact is
you're so lovably inept.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#31 Nov 16 2012 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,010 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:

Fact is democrats want high unemployment and more illegal immigrants and more people on food stamps.


For me it had more to do with what I didn't want. I didn't want women being forced to have their rapists' babies because it was God's will and we should have been able to shut that whole thing down anyway if we didn't want to get pregnant. I didn't want the country to stop progressing towards equal protection under the law for the LGBT community. I didn't want to see illegal immigrants hunted down in the streets after they fled their own countries in terror seeking asylum and a better life here.

Honestly Crazy, your name says it all. If republicans weren't so ******* ******* CRAZY, they would have a shot at the white house and maybe fixing the fiscal mess we are in.
#32 Nov 16 2012 at 12:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

CLEARLY THEY STOLE THE ELECTION BY BUYING OFF THE POOR!!


You can see why it's a more appealing narrative than "Our 1985 ideas were repudiated yet again and the electorate is moving on" right?


Yeah obama increasing people on food stamps by 50% had nothing to do with his victory.


Fact is democrats want high unemployment and more illegal immigrants and more people on food stamps.



Point #4.


Toe the party line already.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#33 Nov 16 2012 at 4:34 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:


Yeah obama increasing people on food stamps by 50% had nothing to do with his victory.


The states give out the food stamps.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#34 Nov 16 2012 at 5:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

But seriously, with all the money the Republicans have they can go buy their own poor people.


What they should do is import them from Serbia or something. White, hate Muslims, blame everyone else for their failures, it's a perfect synergy, really. Unfortunately, immigration is evil.



No, I think white immigration is still okay.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Nov 16 2012 at 6:05 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,134 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
So because of someones poor life choices you would hold me at gunpoint because you think I have to much and their children are hungry. You liberals say I should keep out of you bedroom but when the results of what goes on in that bedroom is directly related to how much property I can keep how can I be expected to keep quiet, how can any moral person?


Uhm, don't conservatives want to control the bedroom in the form of less/no abortions, which would lead to a compounding of poor life choices, which would lead to your taxes being used to feed more poor people, which would mean that you have absolutely no ******* idea what you are talking about.

But, hey, you keep on keeping on, let your freak flag fly, dumb ***.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#36 Nov 16 2012 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
Come on, don't let facts get in the way of a good crazy party.
#37 Nov 16 2012 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
Meth, not even once.
#38 Nov 16 2012 at 8:20 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
catwho wrote:
Many of the people on food stamps are called "working poor" - they have jobs, but @#%^ers like the CEO of Papa Johns deliberately keep them underpaid and under full time, so they don't make enough money to pay rent and feed themselves.

At 40 hours at minimum wage, if you have children, you qualify for food stamps.



So because of someones poor life choices you would hold me at gunpoint because you think I have to much and their children are hungry. You liberals say I should keep out of you bedroom but when the results of what goes on in that bedroom is directly related to how much property I can keep how can I be expected to keep quiet, how can any moral person?

What's a poor life choice? Working in a restaurant? Food services has a very low pay rate, especially with servers and taxed tips and the like. So anyone who ends up working in the service industry is just a lower-class citizen. They're *feeding* people, yet the art of making money for its own sake brings you benefits like lower tax rates? Capitalism itself depends on ******** over everyone else just to make another buck. That doesn't exactly strike me as humane.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#39 Nov 17 2012 at 12:35 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,393 posts
Debalic wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
catwho wrote:
Many of the people on food stamps are called "working poor" - they have jobs, but @#%^ers like the CEO of Papa Johns deliberately keep them underpaid and under full time, so they don't make enough money to pay rent and feed themselves.

At 40 hours at minimum wage, if you have children, you qualify for food stamps.



So because of someones poor life choices you would hold me at gunpoint because you think I have to much and their children are hungry. You liberals say I should keep out of you bedroom but when the results of what goes on in that bedroom is directly related to how much property I can keep how can I be expected to keep quiet, how can any moral person?

What's a poor life choice? Working in a restaurant? Food services has a very low pay rate, especially with servers and taxed tips and the like. So anyone who ends up working in the service industry is just a lower-class citizen. They're *feeding* people, yet the art of making money for its own sake brings you benefits like lower tax rates? Capitalism itself depends on ******** over everyone else just to make another buck. That doesn't exactly strike me as humane.


This. Unless you become a high class chef(which some of those who are in that fiel don't really want to do), or manage to open a wildly successful restaurant, you don't get rich in the food service industry. Does that mean that the person with a passion for cooking has made some poor life choices?

____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#40 Nov 17 2012 at 3:11 AM Rating: Good
**
589 posts
Or just get boned by were their born and tourism is the state's largest industry.
#42 Nov 17 2012 at 3:59 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,134 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
All you radical liberals blubbering doesn't change the fact that the number of people on food stamps doubled under obama.


Three things...

What if I am blubbering, and NOT a RADICAL liberal, but just a run of the mill liberal (as a hypothetical, get your panties untwisted)

What if the number of people on food stamps had more to do with the economic problems started before Obama was elected for his first term (again, just as a hypothetical, slow your roll)

What if you held your breath until everyone on this board was satisfied that you had ceased to "exist" (go ahead and try this one, I am interested)
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#43 Nov 17 2012 at 5:43 AM Rating: Good
***
1,877 posts
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:

What if you held your breath until everyone on this board was satisfied that you had ceased to "exist" (go ahead and try this one, I am interested)


Unfortunately once he passes out his body will start breathing again automatically.
#44 Nov 17 2012 at 8:04 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,393 posts
Quote:
All you radical liberals blubbering doesn't change the fact that the number of people on food stamps doubled under obama


Food stamps are at the State Level. Also, they didn't double, I;m not going to go into the math this time, but the math doesn't support the case for doubling, though I will allow that there has been a sizable increase. However, as it was quite clearly a result of a economic downturn that wasn't caused by Obama(and predated him by some time, the root of which lies as far back as the Reagan, Bush Sr. and Clinton administrations), the blame cannot fall on him.

Quote:
Obama knew he'd have to do this to win reelection.


Well now that's just preposterous. You're actually saying that The President, somehow took matters that were out of his control(in control of the States themselves), into his own hands, and made sure more people would be on food stamps? Christ, next thing you know, you'll be harping on about HAARP, and Chemtrails, and other completely ******* ludicrous *********

Quote:
Incidentally this is also why 8% 7.9% employment has become the new norm.


7.9% really isn't that bad(. And, in comparison, during the Great Depression, the unemployment rate was at 25% at its highest, it hit 7.9% when Truman was in the White House, 9.0% under Ford, 10.8% under Reagan(and remained that way for almost 2 years with minimal fluctuation), etc. Also, the unemployment rate was steadily increasing since May 2005, which can definitely not be blamed on Obama, and has been steadily declining since October 2009. Your argument is moot at this point but I'll continue, mostly for my own amusement.

Quote:
This was done on purpose to swell the ranks of the people that vote democrat. It's a simple fact that leeches primarily vote Democrat.


Your statement is completely impossible within the realm of what's actually within the power of the Head Of State. Also, by your logic, the Unemployment rate should still be in the double digits, as the unemployed tend to become "leeches", who you say mostly vote Democrat.

Quote:
The reason the gop isn't winning national elections is quite simple to understand and far more difficult to solve. The Democrats have created so many dependant citizens the numbers just aren't in our favor.


Actually, they are, the GOP just keeps fielding people who aren't viable as real leaders. What happened anyway? I mean, George H. W. Bush was/is a good man, and was a good leader, even if he doesn't get much credit for some very, very good moves on his part. Reagan, though I disagree with his economic ideas, was a strong, likeable man with great conviction and worthy of great respect(IMO), Nixon, while crooked, was willing to do what needed to be done to get **** done. Eisenhower was intelligent, rational, analytical, and very much loved by the people due to his part in WW2. If the GOP wants to win, they need to put forward someone who wont be sidetracked by things that are not, in any rational world, difficult issues. I mean, you talk about small government, but you want the government to be involved in everything that it shouldn't be involved in. Gay marriage? It's irrational to keep the fight against it going when it has absolutely zero effect on the things people claim to be against it for, re: their own religion, as if religious bias has any place in a modern government. Abortion? Same thing. Etc. Etc. Etc. Field someone who'll tackle the issues that actually matter, not just to the American public, but to the entire ******* planet(because, lets be honest, we all depend on you guys not going under anytime soon) in the long run, which is to say, the next 10? 20? 100 years? The religious right are by no means a majority, stop pandering to them, and you'll stand a chance.

/rant off

Anyway,

Quote:
In a couple years when the economy has collapsed because of obamacare the gop will clean up in the mid terms just like we did 2 years ago.


The economy is improving, albeit very slowly, and not necessarily at the same rate in all areas of it. Just sayin'. Look at the numbers, numbers don't lie.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#46 Nov 17 2012 at 3:02 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
The economy is not improving.

And the infidels are not entering Baghdad.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#47 Nov 17 2012 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
So when unemployment is 10% in four years and the number of people on food stamps doubles from today? What will be your excuse then?


I'll consider your guy?
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#48 Nov 17 2012 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
crazylegz1975 wrote:
So when unemployment is 10% in four years and the number of people on food stamps doubles from today? What will be your excuse then?

Skewed polls!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49 Nov 17 2012 at 4:15 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:

And obama is responsible for the current economy.


Saved so in four years when the economy is looking better I can point out how much of a liberal supporting commie you really are. That is, of course, assuming you don't say something so brain dead retarded that you get banned.
#50 Nov 17 2012 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Criminy wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:

And obama is responsible for the current economy.


Saved so in four years when the economy is looking better I can point out how much of a liberal supporting commie you really are. That is, of course, assuming you don't say something so brain dead retarded that you get banned.

Meh, he'll just come back again a few weeks later anyways.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#51 Nov 17 2012 at 11:52 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,393 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
The economy is not improving.

And obama is responsible for the current economy.

And despite your denials obama knows that Democrats benefit from increasing the number dependent on govn and is doing what he can to ensure that doesn't change.

So when unemployment is 10% in four years and the number of people on food stamps doubles from today? What will be your excuse then?


So you're asserting that Obama travelled through time, gave reagan his economic ideas, told bush sr. To attack iraq(although I'll make a note here that I actually feel that Desert Storm was both justified and right) hence convincing his son that that needed to be done again later, convinced clinton to do some major deregulation of banks and wall street, then went and told W. To not only remember to attack Iraq, but also to pay for it with deficit spending. Then, he went and told bankers and the big wigs on wall street that the best way to do business was to basically play with imaginary money and bet against their other financial commitments(or whatever), and then he came back, and beatt he sh*t out of every governor and state senator/congressman(however that works) until they agreed to increase the food stamps. So now he's just waiting, biding his time until the time machine has recharged, and then he'll go and cause the great depression...and...

Wait, where was I going with this?

...

Right! Now I remember, I was going to say that you have no grasp on either reality or what's actually possible within it...again...

Edited, Nov 18th 2012 12:59am by Driftwood
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 190 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (190)