Almalieque wrote:
I guess my response didn't quite make it.
The belief that marijuana would benefit society is absurd, because it isn't the substance but the effect that people seek.
Same with Valium, Prozac, Xanax, Ativan, et al. I guess those don't benefit the people who use them correctly either, do they?
Define smoking marijuana correctly? Isn't the whole point of taking such said drugs is to get in a stupor phase? The closest similarity that is with the aforementioned drugs is to relieve pain, which is not the same thing as being in a stupefied state.
BrownDuck wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
The belief that marijuana would benefit society is absurd, because it isn't the substance but the effect that people seek.
Same with Valium, Prozac, Xanax, Ativan, et al. I guess those don't benefit the people who use them correctly either, do they?
Define smoking marijuana correctly? Isn't the whole point of taking such said drugs is to get in a stupor phase? The closest similarity that is with the aforementioned drugs is to relieve pain, which is not the same thing as being in a stupefied state.
For many years, I carried a one-hitter, or a fake metal half cigarette in a wooden dugout. Periodically throughout a day, I would pack some into the cigarette and take a hit or two from it holding the smoke to be more effective. Just enough of a buzz to slightly alter my mental state; not enough to incapacitate or slow my function enough to impact my work performance (or whatever activity I was pursuing at that time). Many friends I smoked with didn't want to get extremely high. It tends to make you slow and lazy and was boring as shit, imo.