Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Final Stretch Election ThreadFollow

#327 Nov 06 2012 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
At this time, to judge by the scant results filtering in, Obama is leading handily. However, that is to be expected since all the Republicans are still at work...

Totem
#328 Nov 06 2012 at 9:15 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
At this time, to judge by the scant results filtering in, Obama is leading handily. However, that is to be expected since all the Republicans are still at work...

At work counting votes is the better punchline. Don't forget to cast your vote. That Fienstein race is a squeaker.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#329 Nov 06 2012 at 9:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Am so ready for Christmas commercials.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#330 Nov 06 2012 at 10:08 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Totem wrote:
At this time, to judge by the scant results filtering in, Obama is leading handily. However, that is to be expected since all the Republicans are still at work...

Totem

What's with all the bad second-hand humoUr?

slacker..
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#331 Nov 06 2012 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
He's reduced to stealing jokes from Dennis Miller. Show a little sympathy.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#332 Nov 06 2012 at 10:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
538 dropped from 92% Obama to 90.9% Obama.

Mitt-mentum!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#333 Nov 06 2012 at 11:35 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Jophiel wrote:
538 dropped from 92% Obama to 90.9% Obama.

Mitt-mentum!
Probably because of Newt Gingrich's prediction that Romney will take over 300 EV's for sure.
#334 Nov 06 2012 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Totem wrote:
At this time, to judge by the scant results filtering in, Obama is leading handily. However, that is to be expected since all the Republicans are still at work...

Totem
What are you talking about? Romney's key demographic is retired.
#335 Nov 06 2012 at 11:45 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
It's work just getting out of bed at that point.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#336 Nov 06 2012 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Totem wrote:
At this time, to judge by the scant results filtering in, Obama is leading handily. However, that is to be expected since all the Republicans are still at work...

Totem
What are you talking about? Romney's key demographic is retired.


In the realm of old white politicians, Romney is one of the whipper-snappers.

Did anyone win this thing yet?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#337 Nov 06 2012 at 12:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Gotta sit on the front porch with the garden hose making sure those ill-mannered youngins don't trample the flower beds on their way to school.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#338 Nov 06 2012 at 12:49 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Obama crushing it in early OH exits. Kerry did too, of course....
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#339 Nov 06 2012 at 12:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yeah, I haven't looked seriously at an exit poll since 2004.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#340 Nov 06 2012 at 3:10 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Not sure if it's true, but was told that Romney owned the business that makes the voting machines. I thought that was pretty funny...Smiley: lol Some people might have Christmas earlier.
#341 Nov 06 2012 at 3:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Almalieque wrote:
Not sure if it's true, but was told that Romney owned the business that makes the voting machines. I thought that was pretty funny...Smiley: lol Some people might have Christmas earlier.


mmmmHHHMMMmmmm..... Smiley: dubious

It's bad calibration and one reason I dislike the electronic only thing but no, I don't believe it was HAXX!! unless they were dumb enough to hack is in a way blindingly obvious to the voter.

Edited, Nov 6th 2012 3:15pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#342 Nov 06 2012 at 3:22 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Not sure if it's true, but was told that Romney owned the business that makes the voting machines. I thought that was pretty funny...Smiley: lol Some people might have Christmas earlier.


mmmmHHHMMMmmmm..... Smiley: dubious

It's bad calibration and one reason I dislike the electronic only thing but no, I don't believe it was HAXX!! unless they were dumb enough to hack is in a way blindingly obvious to the voter.

Edited, Nov 6th 2012 3:15pm by Jophiel


I was wondering why Romney's name appeared first on the ballot there. Was going to post the question, then decided to not be a lazy *** and googled it myself. In case anyone's curious:

http://www.13wmaz.com/news/article/201348/52/Why-Does-Romneys-Name-Appear-First-on-the-Ballot

And, the ulterior reason that I was curious about it:

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/nameplac.htm

Edited, Nov 6th 2012 4:23pm by Eske
#343 Nov 06 2012 at 3:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In Ohio they rotate the list from precinct to precinct. Obama comes before Romney but, if you rotate it one tick upward, the list starts with Romney, lists all the third party yahoos and ends with Obama.

That's just an artifact of the way they try to keep it fair though.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#344 Nov 06 2012 at 3:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Yeah it's "randomized" in most places.

Honestly though if you simply check the name that's at the top of the ballot without reading it, I'm not sure you should actually be voting without some assistance.
#345 Nov 06 2012 at 3:36 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
That's just an artifact of the way they try to keep it fair though.


If they really wanted to make it fair, then the candidates names would be arranged on a bottom-left - to - top-right diagonal, thereby balancing our tendencies to read left-to-right and top-to-bottom.


____________❒ Mitt Romney

❒ Barack Obama



Smiley: schooled

PS: Of course, studies would need to be done to determine the exact angle. I think 45° still favors the top guy. 30° seems more balanced, to me. But length of name is also a variable that needs to be accounted for. There's an algorithm for all this, somehow. And yes, I'm aware that I'm taking this a bit too seriously.

Edited, Nov 6th 2012 4:40pm by Eske
#346 Nov 06 2012 at 3:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
I voted for Zombieland because it was on top... Smiley: um

Anyway we randomize, the Green Party chick was on top here.

Usually if it gets to the point where I'd be using something arbitrary there other far better criteria. My favorites include: not voting for someone who has a similar name to someone you hate, voting for the woman, or going for the shorter name. Also kudos to people who have names I can pronounce, and sometimes alternating top and bottom is cool too. Really depends on the mood.

Edited, Nov 6th 2012 1:51pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#347Almalieque, Posted: Nov 06 2012 at 3:54 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) They should be placed under two different "cups" with an extra cup that has a "You lose" message. After being rotated around for about 15 seconds, you are able to choose a cup. Whatever you choose, is your vote. Test your sight!
#348 Nov 06 2012 at 3:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Click 'vote' when the blinking light flashes for your candidate and win $100!

Smiley: nod
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#349 Nov 06 2012 at 4:26 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
And, the ulterior reason that I was curious about it:

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/nameplac.htm


Not really relevant for president though. I'm sure the research most applies to that handful of positions you vote for every time that you have no clue who the hell anyone is anyway. So if you're running for a judicial spot or school board slot, it might make a difference.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#350 Nov 06 2012 at 4:33 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I would list a bunch of positions that you have to agree or disagree with along side a given weight. After you finish, your responses will be paired to those positions of the candidates. There's your vote.
#351 Nov 06 2012 at 4:42 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
gbaji wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
And, the ulterior reason that I was curious about it:

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/nameplac.htm


Not really relevant for president though. I'm sure the research most applies to that handful of positions you vote for every time that you have no clue who the hell anyone is anyway. So if you're running for a judicial spot or school board slot, it might make a difference.


I'm not really willing to say one way or the other if I think it would be relevant. I honestly have no clue how many people walk into a polling booth undecided.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 365 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (365)